There are many dangers in our world, some worse than others. But there is one problem that we can fix. Children going out without adult supervision. If children go out without adult supervision, they can risk their behavior, they can get hurt, and they can join the wrong crowd. First, there is risky behavior. When children go out without adult supervision, they have a higher chance of getting into trouble. Also, it can only take a child nine minutes to adapt bad behavior. A New York study shows that almost all children are more likely to do things they wouldn’t do without adult supervision. Next, the way a child could act in their young years could affect their whole future. If a child has bad behavior, they will have bad behavior as an …show more content…
With adult supervision, children will less likely be getting hurt. Adults can protect children in dangerous situations like kidnapping. Also, a child will likely not know how to react in those situations. If a child gets hurt, they won’t have an adult to help them or bring them to the hospital. A U.S study shows that if a child gets kidnapped, they won’t have the knowledge of what to do. That proves another reason adult supervision is good. Finally, children can join the wrong crowd. With the loss of adult supervision, a child will have the freedom to see and do whatever they want. But that can severely affect that child’s whole future. Sometimes the people they see, are not the best people and can even be a bad influence. A child could see something another child does, but without adult supervision, the child might not know how bad that is. That is the final reason children need adult supervision when going out There are reasons children shouldn’t go out without adult supervision. I used logos by using a fact from NY Times. I also used pathos by saying how it can negatively affect a child’s future. In reason 2, I used pathos by saying how a child can get hurt without adults. I didn’t use any other KELP strategy. I used pathos in paragraph 3 by saying how a child can join the wrong crowd. I used no other kelp strategy. But children may
To leans our children in your environment where they grow up every day is a better decision. One things most difficult for parents is to give independence for own children because we not understand that their need that. In contrast teenagers have to lean their hand that overprotection is one dad decision for Example puttie caballero, even though knight’s twin daughter, symphony and kymberlee age 19 and attending college, knight remain deeply involved in their day to day live. She goes shopping with them. She gives them advice about their relationships.” (Don Aucoin 1). I think help our children is very good but we need to lead what their can do while they grow up also that can became in excessive at
Plato once said, “For good nurture, and education implant good constitutions.” When a child is raised in a safe environment with loving parents who are able to provide them with everything the child needs, what would influence them to bring harm onto others if they are not raised in a harmful or unhealthy environment? On the other hand, children who are raised in an unhealthy home, with verbal, physical, psychological, or sexual abuse from either a parent, sibling, or relative, how are they supposed to know it is not right to do those actions onto others? The way a child is treated from infancy through adolescence influences them for the rest of their life. What they witness, what they are taught, what they hear, what they experience will depict
If children have not developed a good level of self-control they are susceptible to live a life of crime and partake in other socially unacceptable behavior. They are often focused on the immediate pleasure and don’t consider the risks or harm that cou...
We’ve all seen that parent in the grocery store or at the amusement park. Maybe this person is a neighbor, obscure relative, or even a best friend. This child with a colorful backpack on is being walked about by their parental figure. The child may be crying, throwing a temper tantrum, sucking on their fingers, or maybe even being dragged across the linoleum floor. This ordeal tends to be a spectacle. However there will still be parents who go into public places with their children tugging at a leash. Without fail it will cause more than...
Bad parenting also causes many people to do anything they want to. We need parents to be really strict with us to help us knowing our rules and with the world.A lot of people who cause accidents, are people whose parents either rejected them or just let them do whatever, also known also bad parents.Articles state bad parenting is really bad for a kids mental health. Paying attention to your kids, being responsible for them, and not letting them do certain things will help your kids and others later in life and will cause less casualties. You will be thanked later in life and will make this world a splendid place to be
... such as walking in well lit areas, abstaining from areas know as “hot spots”, and letting someone know your whereabouts, are suggested. Also, these individuals should be aware of the risks that come with certain types of activities. In conjunction to awareness, individuals should be involved in family leisure activities so that their idle hands do not become the devils workshop. Parents provide the primary foundation in the children’s socialization; if this process is not effective or neglected the result could be detrimental. It may lead children to transition into adulthood without the fundamental skills that prevent the development of a criminal disposition. Now that routine activities theory has created a clear understanding of the economics of crime, let’s focus our research on which parenting methods could prevent criminality or crime before if ever develops.
There has been much debate about the parenting style called “Free Range parenting.” It allows children to make decisions with minimal parental interference. There were two different articles I read “Kids’ Solo Playtime Unleashes ‘Free-Range’ Parenting Debate”, written by Jennifer Ludden and published February 18th, 2015 and “Maryland family under investigation for letting their kid’s walk home alone.” I do not agree with either of these two articles and do not agree with this parenting style.
During the adolescent year’s children goes through physical and mental changes which could cause them to act deviant. Family support and good family structure is needed to help an adolescent cope with changes in their behavior. Other family crises such as parents’ divorce, death, and economics factor can trigger a child to act out differently as a mean to seek attention. Juveniles are not as good at decision making as adults, because they are young and does not have much experience in life they could make bad decisions that would make their life difficult. Youngsters do not think of the consequences of their action thus “they face deciding whether to engage in a risky behavior, such as taking drugs, shoplifting, or getting into a fight, in situation involving emotions, stress, peer pressure, and little time for reflection” (national academic press). Adults could think rationally where as children do not develop to think rationally between the ages of ten and seventeen thus children should not be punished as bad as an adult.
Children who are under the influence of parental guidance tend to have better behavior and can distinguish between right and wrong. “Children placed in situations lacking parental guidance are six times as likely than those with parental guidance to have a high level of overall difficulties including, emotional issues, conduct disorders, and peer problems” (McGuire 2014). Children do not have to worry about the weight of responsibility because their parents take on that responsibility for them. Kids brought up in normal, loving environments behave in a more civilized manner and exhibit better etiquette than those who are placed in negative, harsh environments such as...
Overpowering sternness leads may lead to a rebellious child, while passive parenting may lead children to inept for the challenges of adulthood. Parenting requires more than teaching children submissiveness, or building of self-importance. Children learn best from a role model who is admirable. Parenting is a great opportunity to set the course of one’s entire life in the right direction.
Children behave the way they see fit. If a child lives in an unstable home where his/her parents
Authoritarian parents, show very little acceptance, have very high expectations of their children and are extremely controlling. These parents are strict, and use a prohibitive and punishment method. According to a research done by Kimberly Kopko from Cornell University, it “reveals that adolescents of authoritarian parents learn that following parental rules and adherence to strict discipline is valued over independent behavior. As a result, adolescents may become rebellious or dependent” (2). The adolescents who come to be rebellious may showcase hostile behaviors, while those who are passive are likely to stay relying on their parents (2).
A number of studies have been done on the caretaker’s effects on the child and suggests that the effects may have been caused by child’s behavior as much as by the caretaker’s (according to Bell 1979). The child’s aggression level can be affected by the parent’s authoritarian discipline. “Parents differ widely in sensing the needs o...
With more parents working today, one perception is that children are being forced to grow up too quickly, which could be why crime among the youth is growing each day. In the past it was thought that, “If parents raise their children properly, they will be law abiding citizens. In contrast, if a child does not behave appropriately, it must be the parents’ fault” (Nakaya 49), however this may not be the case. While there is not one single cause for juvenile delinquency, Graham believes that bad parenting falls somewhere on the list (1719). So the question arises, is it the child’s fault for the crime he or she committed or should the blame lay upon the parent, who if was present in the child’s life and instilling proper discipline, might prevent the crimes from happening at all. This is a somewhat complex question because in order to place blame or punishment on either the child or the parent several factors must be determined first, such as: what type of home life does the child have? Are the parents reliable role models for their child? Do the parents take every necessary action to ensure that their child knows right from wrong and is aware of consequences that may follow bad behavior? How much time does the child spend unattended and during those times are there options for the child to keep them away from unwanted situations? Does the child have any underlying mental or learning disabilities? What types of relationships does the child have at school? After all these initial factors are investigated and if the parent is shown to be doing everything possible to keep their child from doing wrong but the child still does so, would the blame lie with the child offender or with the parent?
As a parent, I have spent a great deal of time observing the behavior, motivation, and thought processes of my children. As they mature these processes have changed, and it has been fascinating to watch. I have learned a great deal on the limits of self control in the adolescent mind during this time, and I believe that families should be held responsible for crimes committed by their teenagers.