Humans deserve the right to die just as much as they deserve the right to live. No human should have the power to take another human’s right to live; they also shouldn’t have the power to take someone’s right to die. Assisted suicide should be legalized because the right to die is something every human should have. People with terminal illness deserve the right to end there life on their own terms.
Some people believe that assisted suicide is morally and socially wrong. According to the article “Washington Dc Passes Dangerous Bill To Legalize Assisted Suicide. Assisted suicide discriminates old people and black people. Assisted suicide is not a racial movement. It is an act of ending the pain for the people with terminal illness. Black people have the same right to choose assisted suicide as anyone else and the same goes for old people. The only purpose for assisted suicide is to help end the pain of terminal illness. Regardless of the arguments in protest of legalizing assisted suicide, there are far more reasons as to why it should be legalized.
Terminal illness can make someone’s life completely miserable, and assisted suicide would ensure that their lives would not be horrible.
…show more content…
According to the article “The Death Treatment” by Rachel Aviv, there is a girl named Godelieva that has suffered her whole life with depression, She felt as if she was a burden to her children; she also felt as if she lost her will to live. She had met a new doctor which was an expert on the subject of assisted suicide. Godelieva had carried out her assisted suicide on April 19th, 2012. Assisted suicide helps shorten the time a terminally ill patient is miserable, therefore it needs to be a national law. Many states have already legalized assisted suicide and this needs to be a national law. According to the article “ Assisted- Suicide Fight Moves To Colorado” by Dan Frosch Matt larson is a guy that had a brain tumor and had to get it removed; He states that if he is suffering and near death he wants assisted suicide to be an available option. Also he said it would make his life more comfortable. The patients with terminal illnesses go through a great deal of pain and suffering this is why more states should legalize assisted suicide. Although many haven’t legalized assisted suicide, there are many states that have; If assisted suicide was a national law medical insurance companies wouldn’t spend as much money. If patients are allowed to commit assisted suicide, insurance companies will not have to pay out as much money. Insurance companies spend a great amount of money on treatments such as chemotherapy. If a cancer patient no longer wants to live in the condition that they are in and want to choose assisted suicide; it would save money for the insurance companies. Assisted suicide is cheaper than chemotherapy. If a person has Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever they are most likely to die within three weeks of catching the disease. Ebola has terrible symptoms that no person would want to live through, this person would want to choose assisted suicide. Trying to cure Ebola costs a substantial amount of money, therefore assisted suicide would save a tremendous amount of money that these companies are putting out. Not only would the medical insurance companies be saving money, they would also be worry free about the procedure because it has already been established. A process of proper guidelines have already been established for assisted suicide.
According to the article “Aid In Dying Movement Advances” by The New York Times, Two professionals must get together and decide that the patient will most likely die in the next six months. The two professionals also must determine that the patients requests are sound of mind. Doctors must also ensure they are not being terrorized to choose assisted suicide. A request for a lethal dose of painkillers must be asked for again by the patient 15 days after it was originally made in order for the drugs to be given to the patient. (“Aid In Dying Movement Advances”.) While there are official rules guidelines to follow there is also certain steps to follow in order to properly carry out an assisted
suicide. Assisted suicide is not murder the patients complete the process themselves. According to the article “Whose RIght To Die?” By Ezekiel Emanuel “In physician-assisted suicide a doctor supplies a death-causing means, such as barbiturates, but the patient performs the act that brings about death.” The article also states “In voluntary euthanasia the physician performs the death-causing act after determining that the patient indeed wishes to end his or her life. Neither term applies to a patient's refusal to life-support technology, such as a respirator or artificial nutrition, or a patient's request that it be withdrawn; these have had ethical and constitutional sanction for years.” In assisted suicide the patient does all of the work, the doctor only prescribes the drug after a long process to determine if they are eligible for assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is not murder and has its own process therefore it needs to be legalized Assisted suicide should be legal, assisted suicide has rules and guidelines and it also has its own process, people with a terminal illness have the right to choose assisted suicide. Assisted suicide has a great process that cleared every problem that people said was wrong with the law. Assisted suicide is not murder the patient does everything independently. Assisted suicide is not prejudice against old black people. Assisted suicide is wanted by many suffering patients it needs to be legalized.
Assisted suicide should be legalized nationwide in the United States, because every human deserves a peaceful death. Assisted suicide is when person that has been told they are terminally ill and won’t survive, they can go to a doctor and get prescribed a medication that results in death. It’s not murder, it’s giving the person a chance to say their good byes and leave this world when they are ready to go. Not making them suffer and go on when they don’t want to.
In her paper entitled "Euthanasia," Phillipa Foot notes that euthanasia should be thought of as "inducing or otherwise opting for death for the sake of the one who is to die" (MI, 8). In Moral Matters, Jan Narveson argues, successfully I think, that given moral grounds for suicide, voluntary euthanasia is morally acceptable (at least, in principle). Daniel Callahan, on the other hand, in his "When Self-Determination Runs Amok," counters that the traditional pro-(active) euthanasia arguments concerning self-determination, the distinction between killing and allowing to die, and the skepticism about harmful consequences for society, are flawed. I do not think Callahan's reasoning establishes that euthanasia is indeed morally wrong and legally impossible, and I will attempt to show that.
Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is a very important issue. It is also important tounderstand the terms and distinction between the varying degrees to which a person can be involved in hastening the death of a terminally ill individual. Euthanasia, a word that is often associated with physician assisted suicide, means the act or practice of killing for reasons of mercy. Assisted suicide takes place when a dying person who wishes to precipitate death, requests help in carrying out the act. In euthanasia, the dying patients may or may not be aware of what is happening to them and may or may not have requested to die. In an assisted suicide, the terminally ill person wants to die and has specifically asked for help. Physician-assisted suicide occurs when the individual assisting in the suicide is a doctor rather than a friend or family member. Because doctors are the people most familiar with their patients’ medical condition and have knowledge of and access to the necessary means to cause certain death, terminally ill patients who have made
Imagine a scenario where you’re in tremendous pain and you want to end the pain before death comes over you. Even if you wanted to make that choice, the government of the United States has already made this choice for you by illegalizing what is called assisted suicide. There are 3 different kinds of suicide involving the assistance of others; assisted suicide, euthanasia and passive euthanasia, and mercy killing, these came to be a hot topic during the 1990s when doctors and nurses started going to jail because of helping their patients kill themselves, not for financial gain but because it was the humane and just thing to do(Ackerman). As a human we are given the right to life as an infant, so shouldn’t by default we be given the right to die? Assisted suicide should be legal for many reasons, because of our freedoms and liberties, to lessen the amount of end of life pain and to save money.
Life is a precious gift. Humans have the ability to decide how their lives are to be lived. In the United States, people can legally control to a limited extent their death. In a living will, a person can request that extraordinary life sustaining measures be withheld in terminal medical condition. However, the abrupt ending of a life via assisted suicide is controversial. Should people be allowed to take their own lives when facing a painful and prolonged ending? I believe that they should have that option.
Terminally ill patients should have the legal option of physician-assisted suicide. Terminally ill patients deserve the right to control their own death. Legalizing assisted suicide would relive families of the burdens of caring for a terminally ill relative. Doctors should not be prosecuted for assisting in the suicide of a terminally ill patient. We as a society must protect life, but we must also recognize the right to a humane death. When a person is near death, in unbearable pain, they have the right to ask a physician to assist in ending their lives.
Only people who have witnessed or experienced a terminal illness know how much it impacts a person’s life and their families. According to the Cancer Facts and Figures, in 2015, there was an estimate of 1,658,370 people who were diagnosed with cancer and 589,430 of those diagnosed with cancer had died (American Cancer Society). Medication evolves every day, yet there is little to do for cancer patients. They can go through various treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, however some patients these treatments are unbearable. In four states, physician assisted suicide is legal, many other states are debating on the issue at hand. States that have not legalized assisted suicide is due to it being considered murder and can result in imprisonment and doctor license revoked. There has been recent debates involving whether or not physician assisted suicide should be legalized because it is considered murder. Legalizing assisted suicide does not only provide an option to terminally ill patients, but gives others an option. Although some argue that physician assisted suicide should not be legalized, proponents argue that physician assisted suicide should allow options for the patients that are not suffering.
Assisted Suicide, also known as mercy killing, occurs when a physician provides the means (drugs or other agents) by which a person can take his or her own life. This assistance is one of the most debated issues today in society followed by abortion. Physicians are frequently faced with the question of whether or not assisted suicide is ethical or immoral. Although assisted suicide is currently illegal in almost all states in America, it is still often committed. Is assisted suicide ethical? Studies have found that the majority of Americans support assisted suicide. One must weigh both sides of the argument before they can decide.
Physicians Assisted Suicide An Argumentative Essay Physicians Assisted suicide is a topic many people are not fully informed about. Physician assisted suicide, or PAS for short, is when a physician can legally prescribe medicine for a patient to take in order to medically kill themselves. I believe that PAS should be talked more about in order for more people to understand how bad or grave it can be to a family and to our world. PAS falls underneath the umbrella of euthanasia. ?
There are some arguments for assisted suicide and Respect for autonomy is one of them. A competent person should have the right to choose to live or die. Justice is another. Competent terminally ill patients are allowed to hasten their deaths by refusal of medication. Physician assisted suicide may be a compassionate response to unbearable sufferings. Although society has a strong interest in preserving life, that interest lessens when a person is terminally ill and has a strong desire to end life. Lastly, legalization of assisted suicide would promote open discussion. These arguments make it hard to go along with the arguments against assisted suicide.
Physician -assisted suicide has been a conflict in the medical field since pre- Christian eras, and is an issue that has resurfaced in the twentieth century. People today are not aware of what the term physician assisted suicide means, and are opposed to listening to advocates’ perspectives. Individuals need to understand that problems do not go away by not choosing to face them. This paper’s perspective of assisted suicide is that it is an option to respect the dignity of patients, and only those with deathly illness are justified for this method.
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would give a patient an aid in dying. “Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, Medical practioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death” (Lee). “Arguments for and against assisted suicide (sometimes called the “right to die” debate) are complicated by the fact that they come from very many different points of view: medical issues, ethical issues, legal issues, religious issues, and social issues all play a part in shaping people’s opinions on the subject” (Lee). Euthanasia should not be legalized because it is considered murder, it goes against physicians’ Hippocratic Oath, violates the Controlled
Dougherty, Charles J. & Co. “Legalizing Euthanasia Would Harm Society.” Euthanasia- Opposing Viewpoints. Ed.
The authors of “Assisted Suicide: A Right or a Wrong?" say that allowing people to assist in killing and destroying lives, along with devaluing human life, in a society that swears to protect and preserve all life, violates the fundamental moral society has to respect all human life. Once we devalue life, and say a certain quality of life isn’t worth living for a person, where will it stop? If assisted suicide is allowed for the terminally ill, society will start to accept and even presume that those with terminally ill conditions should end their life. The start of this divide assisted suicide can create is exemplified by Ben Mattlin. Mattlin has an incurable disease called spinal muscular atrophy. He was not expected to live into adulthood, yet has survived and now has two children of his own. “I could easily convince anyone that suicide is a rational option for me...and that scares me. Why shouldn’t I have the same barriers protecting me from moments of suicidal fantasies as everyone else has?” (Mattlin). This stresses the danger, as a society, that is posed to those with terminal conditions who want to live. Assisted suicide though seems to almost encourage ill people to end their lives. This is emphasized in the article “Assisted Suicide: A Right or a Wrong?", explaining that if assisted suicide is legalized on the basis of compassion and mercy that society could start assisting “and
Lastly, I support the idea of legalizing euthanasia because the patients own their bodies, and they can do anything with it. Even though the doctor is the one who put the patient to death in a process of euthanasia, the patient is the one who makes the decision to be “killed”, and therefore, euthanasia is a type of physician-assisted suicide, which is not any of other people business.