Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Scientific impacts on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Almost Human a Book Critique The book Almost Human by Shirley Strum is a combination of the story of her life spent with the Papio Anubis or Baboons and the research she collected over the course of many years about them. Strum’s research became revolutionary in the academic world for anthropologists and scholars alike for her many discoveries into the lives of baboons that were previously unknown or misunderstood. These discoveries were focused on male baboon aggression and social strategies within a group of baboons called the Pumphouse Gang from which the majority of her research was based off of. One of her greatest challenges that she recounts in her book is that of her fight to save and protect the baboons. That is when she takes the opportunity to reach out to her audience and promote the importance of primates and why they are worth protecting. Strum’s journey to better understand baboons in the wild is full of ups and downs and incredible discoveries that would change how people see primates and …show more content…
would open the door way to future research of primates and their importance to the world. Shirley Strum wrote this book in a way that conveyed a story and not just a collection of her research on the baboons she studied. The book unfolds in a way that is easy to understand and the audience is able to stay interested through the humor, drama, and excitement of the daily lives of the Pumphouse Gang. Though not all of her research came from this group alone, her story began with them. She described how much the Pumphouse Gang members taught her about baboons and it was with this group that she made her revolutionary discoveries (Strum, 1987). Over the course of many years Strum collected a plethora of data that disproved the importance of aggression in male baboons, the significance and complexity of social strategy, and the importance of conservation of primates in general. The importance of conserving primates came in the latter half of her book when she wrote of her journey of relocating three baboon troops, including the Pumphouse Gang, out of fear of them all being killed off by farmers (Strum, 1987). Strum’s journey into the world of baboons led to several changes in how scientists and people in general perceived baboons and it was these new concepts that she focused on the most. Throughout her studies Strum discovered that the original idea that a baboon male’s position in his group was not built and kept through aggression. The male baboons whom she observed that helped to debunk this concept were Ray, Bo, and David. When Ray tried to become a new member of the Pumphouse Gang he had to become friends with one of the females of the group before he was accepted into it, instead of aggressively pushing his way into the Pumphouse Gang. Bo and David both competed in the Pumphouse Gang to make friends and gain future mates but only succeeded when they didn’t use aggression. Strum also found that the most successful male baboons in a given group were those that had what she called ‘long-term residency’. These were male baboons that had stayed with a particular group for a really long time and she learned that those with ‘long-term residency’ actually used the least amount of aggression compared to the newest members (Strum, 1987). The discovery that males did not rely on their aggression, and that their size and physical strength were irrelevant in the fight for gaining female friends, or mates, created a change in the academic community. These findings could potentially create a chain effect for people that may begin to question just how much they truly know about primates, especially if something this relevant to the understanding of social behavior in baboons was overlooked or missed so easily. Instead of using aggression to climb the social and hierarchal ladders of their group’s, male baboons had to develop special social strategies in order to be successful in creating friends, mates, and alliances. The baboons Bo and David both chose different strategies to climb the social ladder. Bo being the outsider and newest member of the Pumphouse Gang tried the more aggressive approach, but was unsuccessful and got into a lot of trouble due to this and as a result many of the females wanted nothing to do with him. David was a native born to the Pumphouse Gang and he tried a more diplomatic approach. This eventually worked for him and his kindness toward the females paid off and he gained new friends and future potential mates (Strum, 1987). Even females would use social strategies to get what they wanted; Peggy, a female baboon of the Pumphouse Gang, would use her friendships with the males in her group to gain food or help in disputes (Strum, 1987). Strum’s initial research on social strategies and concepts has led to further and more in-depth research on the subject. In Nga Nguyen’s article on mother-infant care mothers of lower social status were found to be more protective and less encouraging of infant independence out of fear of their child being harmed by others or bullied. Further, baboon mothers were found to be more inclined to encourage their male offspring to explore further away from them than their daughters because of the matriline system that existed in the baboon culture. They knew the males would eventually leave their group and should get used to exploring further away on their own, whereas the females would never leave (Nguyen, 2012). These research studies have been essential in better understanding baboon behavior and perhaps even how humans also may have behaved in the past. Shirley Strum believed that by unlocking the secrets to baboon behaviors would help humans to better understand how we may have behaved during our evolutionary journey all the way to today. She argued that baboons have much to teach society and they must be protected and not allowed to disappear into history books, especially when there is still so much more to learn about them. Strum demonstrates the importance of these primates when she fights extensively to save the Pumphouse Gang and two other baboon groups from being killed off by farmers due to crop raiding by relocating them to Colcheccio and Chololo respectively (Strum, 1987). Through her research Strum attempts to promote conservation of baboons and primates in general with the argument that primate studies are important to learning about human evolution and behavior. However, other scholars have taken different approaches when promoting the need to protect and conserve primates. In Marilyn A. Norconk’s article she expresses how important primates are to conservation of environments by acting as seed dispersers in their natural environment and is thus expressing another reason why primates, such as baboons, need defending (Norconk, 2011). These arguments combined proved how primates are interconnected to so many different parts of the world that can be affected greatly by their loss or disappearance. Strum’s love of baboons was conveyed throughout her entire book and she worked hard to try and bring this love to her audience.
She did this by educating her readers’ on the baboon life, by informing them of new discoveries about them, and expressing how the continued study of primates is still very important to help further our understanding of human behavior and human evolution. This book was very informative, properly organized, and kept the reader’s attention without falter. Strum led the way for incredible future findings and discoveries into the world of primates and what they have to offer humanity. The courage she had to go against leading opinions and ideas in the scholarly world helped to pave the way for future anthropologists to do the same and to not just agree with previous findings. To search for their own truths and conclusions, because of this Shirley Strum’s research will continue to reach and inspire the minds of generations to
come. Bibliography Nguyen, Nga, Laurence Gesquiere, Susan C. Alberts, Jeanne Altmann. Sex differences in the mother-neonate relationship in wild baboons: social, experiential and hormonal correlates. Animal Behavior 83 (2012). Norconk, Marilyn A., Sude Boinski, Pierre-Michel Forget. Primates in 21st Century Ecosystems: Does Primate Conservation Promote Ecosystem Conservation? American Journal of Primatology. 73.3-8 (2011). Strum, Shirley C. Almost Human: A Journey into the World of Baboons. New York: Random House, 1987.
: Primates didn’t just appear among Earth, but they evolved. The coevolution has to do with flowers and fruits. Fruits were evolving to get tastier for primates to eat and as primates ate them they spread them around as well. As they ate these new evolved fruits and flowers this invited changes onto their bodies as
Dr. Goodall is a well-known British primatologist who has discovered a substantial amount about primates in her many years of research. She has written numerous books, including one that we will be going into depth about called, “Through a Window.” Her book contains personal experiences, research findings, and even pictures to help the readers visualize her scientific breaking moments from her thirty years with the chimpanzees of Gombe. She states that there is are minor differences, and several similarities between humans and the chimpanzees. We will discuss these differences and similarities through their social behavior, intellectual ability, and emotions. To conclude, examine Goodall’s research to adopt what her findings can tell us about our early ancestors, and whether or not her study coincided to the steps of scientific methodology.
Humanity became fascinated with the idea of evolution with the work of Charles Darwin and the Scientific Revolution. People began hunting for fossils that would prove that man had an ape derived ancestry (Weiner, 1955). After various years of searching, a piece of physical evidence was found in England that was said to confirm the theory of evolution (Weiner, 1955).This confirmation came from Charles Dawson’s discoveries from 1908, that were announced publicly in 1912 (Thackeray, 2011). Dawson was believed to have found the fossil remains of the “missing link” between ape and human evolution, the reconstructed skull of Piltdown man (Augustine, 2006). The material was found in stratigraphical evidence and animal remains that were, at the time, adequate enough to confirm the antiquity of the remains (Weiner, 1955). In 1915, another specimen, Piltdown man II, was found further proving this theory (Augustine, 2006). However, this was merely a hoax proven by fluorine relative dating in 1953; the artifacts and bone fragments discovered turned out to be altered to fit the proposed scenario (Augustine, 2006). The skull found was actually composed of a human braincase that was younger than the complimentary orangutan lower jaw (Falk, 2011). Both sections of the skull had been stained to appear to be from the same person of the same age (Falk, 2011).The perpetrator of this act was never caught and there are many theories proposed for the motive of this hoax (Augustine, 2006). Many people have been taken into consideration for this crime, such as Chardin, Woodward, Hinton, and Dawson (Augustine, 2006). Nevertheless, the evidence that proves that Dawson is guilty of this crime against anthropology is quite substantial compared to the evidence...
This article, titled Common Ground, written by Barbara Smuts, points out the main differences between humans and apes, such as our upright stance, large brains, and capacity for spoken language and abstract reasoning. However, the main point of this article is to emphasize the many similarities that apes share with us. Smuts goes into great detail about how human social and emotional tendencies are very reflective in the family of apes.
...ated poorly and could not stand up for itself, it was likely that they were going to move on to another troop. The similarities between baboons and humans is also uncanny. From the way that they choose the most dominant person in their troop for the males, to the way they choose the highest-ranking female. Also, the way that baboons go about getting a mate is very similar to that of humans. Humans, by nature, try to make themselves as appealing as possible to make themselves more desirable for mates. Like baboons, humans do not limit themselves to only men going out and finding a mate, as women do this as well. All in all, Robert Sapolsky painted a very clear picture of how baboons live, interact, mate with each other, and become dominant figures in his book, A Primate’s Memoir.
"Children of the Forest" is a narrative written by Kevin Duffy. This book is a written testament of an anthropologist's everyday dealings with an African tribe by the name of the Mbuti Pygmies. My purpose in this paper is to inform the reader of Kevin Duffy's findings while in the Ituri rainforest. Kevin Duffy is one of the first and only scientists to have ever been in close contact with the Mbuti. If an Mbuti tribesman does not want to be found, they simply won't be. The forest in which the Mbuti reside in are simply too dense and dangerous for humans not familiar with the area to enter.
The evolution of man is constantly in question. While we are reasonably sure that modern humans and primates are both related to the same common ancestor, there is constant debate over what initially caused the two species to split into early hominids and apes. According to some, our longest and most popular theory on the division of man and ape is profoundly wrong. However, those same individuals usually offer an equally controversial theory as a substitute, one that is almost impossible to scientifically test or prove. Both the Savanna Theory and the Aquatic Ape Theory offer solutions to how and why humans evolved into bipedal toolmakers. But with enough questioning, each loses its accountability to rhetorical science.
Every few years, Hollywood releases a new Planet of the Ape movie, which is always a blockbuster hit. Moviegoers flock to see these movies of how apes rise together and how they are actually more intelligent than meets the eye. Most people do not know the premise behind these movies of how smart and closely related apes are to humans. This is because people probably have never taken a physical anthropology class and have not done research on apes –our closet kins. Known for his immense studies in the fields of apes and monkeys, his long term research in the behavior of chimpanzees and mountain gorillas, and his experience in the forests with the apes, the co-director of the Jane Goodall Research Center and writer of our textbook, primatologist
In his lecture, primatologist Robert Sapolsky explains the uniqueness of humans as well as our similarities to other primates. In doing so, he broke it down into six points of interest: aggression, theory of mind, the golden rule, empathy, pleasure in anticipation and gratification postponement, and lastly, culture. Professor Sapolsky approaches each point with interesting fact-based examples thus allowing me to gain insight on humans and other primates. Sapolsky’s knowledge of primates along with his scientific background allows him to make a clear argument that one cannot simply ignore.
Quiatt, D., & Reynolds, V. (1993). Primate behaviour: information, social knowledge, and the evolution of culture. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press].
For the purpose of this paper I visited the Los Angeles Zoo, on October 23, 2015. Luckily I was able to visit all of the animals in the short amount of time I had. I primarily stayed at the Gorilla and Chimp exhibit to understand their behaviors and how they act like us.
Fossey’s early interest in animals and her dream of becoming a veterinarian - led her to San Jose State College. While in college, she changed her important to job-related therapy; Although - her love for animals never died out. At the same time she was becoming more and more interested in Africa. In 1963 , on a 6-week sabbatical in Africa. She ran into DR.Louis Leakey. Who said that he urgently needed some research on the great apes.Fossey agreed to undertake a long-term field study of the mountain gorillas.
Monkey see, monkey do. Apes have always been thought to have an increased level of intelligence. Over the years, researchers have attempted to understand the degree of intelligence these primates possess. However, it is essential to understand the definition of intelligence in order to determine the amount of intelligence primates have. Intelligence is the capability of obtaining knowledge and being able to utilize it in everyday situations. There are many hypotheses that focus on the evolution of intelligence in primates that view a number of factors including brain size and modernism. Primate intelligence has been a topic of interest to many because it will allow us to further understand the close relationship between humans and primates. Additionally, we will be able to understand the difference between human and primate cognition. Some studies suggest that the human and primate brains possess many similarities. This demonstrates why primates tend to respond to stimuli in a manner that is closely related to humans. Researchers have conducted a number of studies in an effort to understand primate cognition.
Jane Goodall has achieved and contributed greatly to the field of anthropology and primatology; she is considered to be one of the world’s most inspiring and dedicated naturalists. Additionally, Goodall has extensively and significantly contributed to society and the animal kingdom. Her work pioneered numerous primate research studies, and has influenced people to look at chimpanzees in a new light, so to speak. As a child, Goodall dreamt of travelling to Africa to observe and learn more about the exotic animals that live there. This dream stems from her fascination of observing wild animals in their natural habitats (The Biography.com Website, 2015). She was a curious young girl and continued to question the natural world around her as she
Shirley's Changes in the Course of Shirley Valentine by Willy Russell "Shirley Valentine" was primarily written as a monologue to express the emotions of a bored middle-aged housewife. The monologue was originally performed by the actress Pauline Collins. The monologue was adapted by Willy Russell and converted into a screenplay. Willy Russell kept most of the original devices such as the voiceovers and the flashbacks to narrate the story. Furthermore he added other character to the screenplay.