Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Culture and its effect on gender
Culture and its effect on gender
Gender on cultural aspects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Culture and its effect on gender
Sheryl Sandberg gave a TED Talk entitled “Why We Have Too Few Women Leaders” in 2010. Sandberg is the Chief Operating Officer of Facebook and before that she was a vice president for Google’s Global Online Sales and Operations and was chief of staff for the Secretary of the Treasury. In this speech, she uses her current position as a powerful working woman, in combination with a strict logical structure and pathetic examples, to make the argument that women should be more aggressive in professional arenas.
This speech is given in front of a large audience at a TED conference. The full auditorium leaves little room for one-on-one connection to Sandberg, so she must rely on connecting to them only through her speech. Sandberg is talking in December of 2010 to a group of women about the current status of women in business and how she would like to see women act in the future. Her age and the date of the
…show more content…
She identifies with them as “we” and discusses the differences between this world and that of our mothers and grandmothers. By only speaking to one gender in her speech, she possibly isolates the influence she could have on men, but on the other hand, it makes her much more appealing to listen to as a woman. The seats in the auditorium are filled with women, which gives her ethos in this situation because she stands out as successful among other women. The larger context here is the entire internet and anyone interested in watching her speech online, but when she gives her speech, she focuses on her immediate audience, not the broader one. But while she does not consider the internet as her audience, it definitely broadens her audience, particularly to men. Online, men are able to listen to her speech and consider whether or not they agree with her points. On TED.com, the speech is also possibly more available to younger women or women who could not afford to attend a TED conference, but may still be inspired by her
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
Sandberg’s definition of a feminism is gender equality with an existing social system. She has transformed and made a positive impact for females in the workforce; inspiring and motivating them to achieve higher corporate jobs. At the beginning of her article Hook analyzes cause and effect by stating that feminist conjecture about a subject without firm evidence was only considered by academics for a long time and Sandberg is changing that idea. The “visionary feminist goal which is not of women running for the world as is, but women doing our part
The emotional appeals that she makes in the source is her effort to look for the happiness for the women, she has the steely voice in fighting for equality for women, to show her true enthusiasm. The most remarkable examples can be taken from the piece is the phrases “We believe”, “We reject”, “We do not accept” she uses in her paper. They can totally show her intense, her strength, and her enthusiasm. Some of them can be taken out here such as: “We believe that women can achieve such equality only by accepting to the full the challenges and responsibilities they share with all other people in our society, as part of the decision-making mainstream of American political, economic and social life”, “We believe that this nation has a capacity at least as great as other nations, to innovate new social institutions which will enable women to enjoy the true equality of opportunity and responsibility in society, without conflict with their responsibilities as mothers and homemakers”, “We do not accept the traditional assumption that a woman has to choose between marriage and motherhood, on the one hand, and serious participation in industry or the professions on the other”, “Above all, we reject the assumption that these problems are the unique responsibility of each individual woman, rather than a basic social dilemma which society must solve”, “We believe that a true partnership between the sexes demands a different concept of marriage, an equitable sharing of the responsibilities of home and children and of the economic burdens of their support”, and “We believe that proper recognition should be given to the economic and social value of homemaking and
People started to open their ears and their hearts. Her overall purpose is to show that there is a gap between men and women that cannot be overlooked and sidestepped for any longer. Women don't only deserve the right to vote, but they deserve the same rights as men. Applying logos, juxtaposition, and strong use of diction to her speech, she connects to her audience and reveals to them the reasons why what she is saying is crucial to the country.
She uses pathos when she emphasizes the things women do that can relate to each other, she combines two fragments that can mean the opposite form each other but complement in a way "whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concern.” Here she talks about washing clothes in a river and taking a break in the office, actions two different type of people do. Solidarity is the main emotion she is portraying to the public. She touches hearts when she talks about the struggles some women go through to help their families the right way and how she feels for them “I want to speak for those women in my own country, women who are raising children on the minimum wage, women who can’t afford health care or child care, women whose lives are threatened by violence, including violence in their own homes.”
Gender dictates various components of American life: political quarrels, typical company employee hierarchies, social norms, the list continues. This year’s presidential election proves this statement to be true; as Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump bump heads against notions of foreign policy and tax reform, American voters have divided themselves into a category of either for or against women’s equality. Trump’s recent rape allegations has portrayed him as sexist, allowing Clinton to make arguments against him and advocate for women’s rights. Besides politics, gender guides child development, teaching children what “roles” both men and women must play in order to be deemed acceptable. This is why the term “CEO”
...women has escalated to an all-time high. Hillary Clinton’s speech “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” targets this growing problem and by portraying a purpose, style and language, and different appeals to the audience effectively.
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
Hillary Clinton’s speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton.
In the American society, we constantly hear people make sure they say that a chief executive officer, a racecar driver, or an astronaut is female when they are so because that is not deemed as stereotypically standard. Sheryl Sandberg is the, dare I say it, female chief operating officer of Facebook while Mark Zuckerberg is the chief executive officer. Notice that the word “female” sounds much more natural in front of an executive position, but you would typically not add male in front of an executive position because it is just implied. The fact that most of America and the world makes this distinction shows that there are too few women leaders. In Sheryl Sandberg’s book “Lean In,” she explains why that is and what can be done to change that by discussing women, work, and the will to lead.
Wilson, Marie C. Closing the Leadership Gap Why Women Can and Must Help Run the World. New York: Viking Adult, 2004. Print
During her early life, Hillary Clinton learned that a huge problem across the globe was gender inequality. Women and men were not equal. Men were making more money than women for the same jobs. She believed she could change this. On September 5, 1995 Hillary Clinton gave a speech at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Clinton uses powerful rhetoric in order to create an air of sympathy for women among her audience. She is hoping to make the world become more aware of the inequalities women face daily while also making them feel ashamed for their previous actions of discriminating women, which would cause them to change their ways. She uses her speech “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights” to create awareness of the discrimination
From the start of the introduction Sandberg indicates her stance, a key factor to a narrative, by saying “It has been more than two decades since I entered the workforce, and so much is still the same. It is time for us to face the fact that our revolution has stalled. The promise of equality is not the same as true equality”(Sandberg, 7). She writes about equality in hopes that one day we will live in an equal world. The only way to achieve this goal is by affecting the identities of today’s women. Some women may be persuaded to change their identities through reason, such as why it’s important for women to “lean in”. Sandberg elaborates her reasoning by saying “I believe that if more women lean in, we can change the power structure of our world and expand opportunities for all”(Sandberg, 171). She is telling her own story as well as others to fully relate to the audience in hope of chan...
Women have become more and more important in the global businesses nowadays, acting as managers and leaders in organizations, including some large-scale transnational corporations, while there is still significant unbalance between male and female leaders in the world nowadays. This essay focuses on women in leadership, as a social issue facing organizations all over the world, by examining the role of ethical SW in responding to the issue under the broader global context. Firstly, the essay identifies one global trend: women in leadership, by referring to literatures and citing some famous female leaders nowadays in the world. In addition, the essay critically explains the role of ethical SW in the broader global society as a response to the
Women leaders have the crucial soft skills of empathy, innovation, facilitation, and active listening (Masaoka, 2006). They also have first-hand life experiences that bring technical skills and experiences from the street level to the workplace (Masoka, 2006). Women often build stronger relationships with clients and outside contacts than their male counterparts. This relationship building skill, provides a key aspect which helps to move businesses forward (Giber et al., 2009). Fortune 500 companies with a high percentage of women significantly outperformed those with fewer women. Companies with the highest representation of women showed higher returns on equity than those with fewer women employees (Giber et al., 2009). Thus, future organizations may have a higher percentage of female leaders than we have experienced in the past. Future leaders must ensure that there is equality among the workforce and that women are accurately represented among the