Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on sherlock holmes character
The hound of the baskervilles critical essay
Sherlock holmes character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on sherlock holmes character
Sherlock Holmes is a truly interesting and captivating character to examine in the context the world around him. Obviously, his intellect sets him apart from the rest of the world, but the way his superior intellect affects his behavior is also fascinating. Time after time he appears to react in a contradictory way to other characters in the book: He avoids emotion at all costs, he doesn’t search for justice, simply to complete the problem and find truth, he doesn’t believe in anything supernatural, and, perhaps most perplexingly, it is in times of isolation that he is the most brilliant. This contradiction to the rest of the characters in the story is what makes Sherlock Holmes such an interesting subject for a novel and Doyle using Sherlock’s …show more content…
Throughout the story, Holmes calls the case “Interesting, though elementary…curious” (Doyle, 1) and a “most interesting problem” (3), but not once, even after the case has been solved does he seem happy that he has caught a killer, or that he has saved lives. He only refers to the case of the Hound of the Baskervilles as a problem. He doesn’t link justice for the dead or keeping people safe with his work, even when recounting his thought process with Watson several months later. He takes all emotion out of solving the mystery and turns it into a type of math problem. He looks only at facts and figures, not at the human motivations behind the act which creates an environment and method exclusive to Sherlock. Because this is such a unique process, and because of Holmes’ brilliance, Sherlock is required to do this alone. His mind works in such a specific way that he doesn’t communicate his entire process to others. After the conclusion of the case, bursting with curiosity, Watson notices, “One of Sherlock Holmes’s defects—if, indeed, one may call it a defect—was that he was exceedingly loath to communicate his full plans to any other person until the instant of their fulfillment,” …show more content…
The rest of the characters in the story seem to warn of isolation, but Sherlock thrives when he is unaccompanied. On the BBC television show, Sherlock occasionally goes to his “Mind Palace” where he can remember the most minute details and solve the unsolvable. When he goes to his mind palace the rest of the characters just wait until Sherlock is has solved it and then he moves on to the next thing on his to-do list, without explaining to the rest of his team what he concluded. At the end of the story Watson even remarks, “he would never permit cases to overlap, and that his clear and logical mind would not be drawn from its present work…” (15). Watson also notices, “Sherlock Holmes had, in a very remarkable degree, the power of detaching his mind at will,” (5). These are rather noteworthy skill because it indicates that even the inside of Sherlock’s mind isolates different subjects, just as he isolates himself in the
In the movie Holmes, in the beginning, was much more prideful and rude to Watson and people in general, but later on, Holmes was a lot nicer and somewhat humble at least compared to the book. This difference made the viewer feel less liking of the character of Holmes and it almost seemed that the director tried to save Holmes’s character by making him nicer at the ending. The difference had a big impact on the feeling of the movie because it felt that he was so stuck up he was rather unapproachable. ...
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle made Sherlock Holmes’s into one of the most famous detective fictional character the world has seen. Sherlock Holmes has all the qualities and more to be the best at what he is,a detective although he is an amateur. I think that Sherlock Holmes is the best fictional character because of all of his unique and outstandingly shocking techniques.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is the creator of the character Sherlock Holmes and John Watson. He was a Scottish writer and physician, he wrote many things in his life. Doyle did not just write detective mysteries he also fantasy and science fiction stories, plays, romances, poetry, non-fiction and historical novels. Even though he wrote many other thing he is mostly well known for writing all of the canon Sherlock stories. Doyle himself had a career in the medical field there he meet many influential people to base his characters from. A letter was found where he wrote to one of his colleagues whose name was Joseph Bell that the most important traits of his character Sherlock was mostly based on him. Bell himself had the career title of forensic
...he met the detective, fell victim to Moriarty’s games. “Moriarty is playing with your mind too. Can’t you see what’s going on!” (Sherlock). During Holmes’ last days before his faked suicide, he pleads with John to see reason through Jim’s manipulations, as does Desdemona with Othello’s accusations. Even Sherlock’s oldest friend Detective Inspector Greg Lestrade was doubting Holmes’ credibility.
In The Great Mouse Detective and Sherlock Holmes everyone goes to Sir Basil or Sherlock Holmes, due to advertisements in the newspapers about how they solved elaborate cases in a quick and mannerly way. In The Great Mouse Detective, Sir Basil doesn’t want to work on the case of finding Olivia’s dad until he comes to the realization that Professor Ratigan may be behind this. In Sherlock Holmes, when the client came to Holmes he didn’t need a particular motive to get him enthused or start working on the case. The Great Mouse Detective and Sherlock Holmes tell similar stories, but in different ways to observe different aspects
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Hound of the Baskervilles is the third of four novels written about his world famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. However, unlike the other books written about Sherlock Holmes, much of The Hound of the Baskervilles is absent of the detective. Instead, the audience is left to work through the mystery of who murdered Mr. Baskerville with Sherlock Holmes’ assistant and friend, as well as the narrator of the novel, Dr. John Watson. There are multiple reasons Doyle may have decided to make Watson the narrator, and to remove Holmes from a large portion of the novel. First, as Holmes is such a dry and clinical person, by making Watson the narrator, Doyle is able to employ more descriptive and entertaining writing. Second,
Portrayed as a work-oriented introvert, this main character isn’t one to devote any time to emotions. “I am afraid Watson, that most of your conclusions are erroneous...I meant, to be frank, that nothing in your fallacies guided towards the truth,” (5) he says harshly as he disproves all of Watson’s theories. This brushing off Watson occurs repeatedly throughout the book. Watson, being the narrator, often explains how he doesn’t take Sherlock’s rudeness lightly. Another example of this is Sherlock’s response to Laura Lyons’ situation with Stapleton. After she explains her love for him, and how he lied to her with Beryl, Sherlock simply says, “I entirely believe you madam...the sending of this letter was suggested to you by Stapleton?” and continues on with the case. (239) Watson, however, shows numerous signs of his capacity to care. Even after just meeting the Barrymores a few weeks before, when Frankland suggested turning Selden into the police Watson says, “My heart sunk for the Barrymores,” implying that he feels compassion for them. (194) He also shows his ability to have emotions when he says, “I was still rather raw over the deception which had been practised upon me, but the warmth of Holmes’s praise drove my anger from my mind.” (206) These emotions of Watson may not be over the top or dramatic, but are standard in our world today, and aren’t familiar to Sherlock. Does this mean that they are opposites in this field? Although Watson may not be as serious about his profession as Sherlock, and Sherlock might not be as compassionate for others, it can be seen that they are both passionate. Sherlock’s life is centered solely around what he does, Watson’s around other people, but the level of dedication they both show is
“People who are in earnest are always interesting, whether you agree with them or not” (The Chronicles). Doyle may be known as the author of Sherlock Holmes, but there are other facets to his life. On account of some strange events that occurred, Doyle was persuaded into thinking that spiritual beings existed. As Doyle’s career advanced he drew the attention of many to himself. He succeeded both by gaining supporters and detractors. He built on his fame by giving lectures. These aspects of his life are connected; his painful childhood led him to a successful medical career where his writing and life partner stepped into the picture. These aspects, when combined, led Doyle to a new world view of spiritualism.
This paper will explore the relationship between Sherlock Holmes and his companion and friend Dr. John Watson. What is the relationship between Holmes and Watson? Are they compatible or are their differences to great for them to overcome. Looking at how they work together will also be a key factor in how well the relationship works between the two of them. Do their own interests and abilities get in the way? Does the time period in which they live factor into the environment of their communication styles?
For Sherlock Holmes, his partner in crime is Dr. John H. Watson. Not only is he a trusted friend, but also he is Holmes’ associate and the first person narrator of the Sherlock tales. The stories of Sherlock Holmes are a collection of short stories and fictional novels created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. These stories are based on a famous and most notorious detective all throughout London, Sherlock Holmes. Along his side, Dr. Watson narrates his and Holmes’ detective cases and reveals Sherlock’s abilities and knowledge of solving cases and fighting deadly crimes. For the duration of the stories, Watson and Holmes share a particular relationship where Holmes verbally dominates Watson, “You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is very clear” (Doyle 241). When he isn’t insulting Dr. Watson he talks about how much he relies on his partner, “I am lost without my Boswell” (Doyle 243).
After concluding the role of Sherlock Holmes as a detective in the story of the Speckled Band, I know that he was one of the most famous detectives in the world, and he bought into the world of detectives different skills and abilities, also, bought his own natural talent and set some very high standards, which detectives these days find
From the start Watson is seen as smart but Holmes is seen as a genius.After finding the mysterious walking stick Watson tells Holmes what he observes and Holmes replies with “Really Watson,you excel yourself,”said Holmes(Doyle 2).Sherlock Holmes is seen as the type of man that thinks he is higher than anyone else.Although Holmes blatantly tel...
The words Watson uses to describe Holmes such as “sharp and piercing” eyes, “hawk-like nose” and “mark the man of determination”. By having Watson describe such characteristics, it saves Holmes of looking like a show off with an ego. These haracteristics are true and surely the detective knows of his abilities but by having Watson aknowledge them brings more to the story because the comments were made based on observations and not by the individual trying to boost his ego.
He pretends that he does not mean to do this "I do not wish to make a mystery" (A Scandal in Bohemia). There is but one case that I have come across in which Sherlock Holmes is outwitted by someone, and when he realises that he has been outwitted, he is amazed. " Holmes staggered back, white with chagrin and surprise" (A Scandal in Bohemia. He is especially amazed that it is a woman that has outwitted him. This has some, but only a slight, effect on his.
Holmes likes attention and never tells anyone his methods, so he appears to be psychic. Dr. Watson is a medical doctor who met Holmes in a previous case, and they have been friends ever since. With his knowledge of medicine, he helps Holmes solve cases that have anything to do with drugs or lunacy, especially since “doctors make the best criminals”. They have ways to make undetected poison and can easily leave their patients to die.” I can relate to Holmes the most because he always likes to solve mysteries, just like the time when I wanted to solve my Secret Santa clue immediately.