Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexual harassment in human resource management
Case studies of sexual harassment in the workplace
Short notes on sexual harassment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexual harassment in human resource management
Sheila Wheelah self-drafted a constructive dismissal lawsuit against Barth Custom Intelligent Machines Inc. (BCIMI), a company in which she has worked at for nine months. Throughout her employment she has experience sexual harassment from her manager Harry Pigletti on occasions in his office, and twice in front of co-workers, even though he had been told to stop, and that he was inappropriate more than fifteen times. According to the lawsuit, Sheila has suffered serious embarrassment, damage to her self-esteem, her reputation, and loss of credibility with co-workers. Her options for moving forward are as followed:
Constructive Dismissal Lawsuit Constructive dismissals happen when an employee resigns due to the events that the employer has
…show more content…
“A fundamental implied term of any employment relationship is that the employer will treat the employee with civility, decency, respect, and dignity.” Pigletti, had made at least fifteen sexual harassment motions towards Wheelah, some of which can be testified to by fellow co-workers. Not only has the acts of Wheelah’s manager cause damage to her self-esteem, it has impeded on the way her fellow co-workers have reacted to her. By going through with the constructive dismissal lawsuit, Sheila Wheelah is able to claim multiple damages, which would provide financial help whilst looking for new employment. It is clear that the actions by Pigeltti, as expressed by Honourable Mr. Justice J.D.B. McDonald, Pigletti failed to treat Wheelah “with civility, decency, respect, and dignity, to which she was entitled. Accordingly, I hold that she was constructively dismissed from her employment” Under these conditions, Wheelah is entitled to her base monthly salary for 3 months, which sums to approximately …show more content…
It is not a healthy workplace environment when an employee is continually sexually harassed by a superior. By choosing to file a constructive dismissal, although finding justice against her manager and high likelihood of being awarded damages, she faces the task of finding a new job with the little education she has. Secondly, should she choose to relocate, she can continue her current career path, and still seek the advancements she desires, but she faces traveling and/or moving. Thirdly, should she choose to seek financial assistance for education she again is able to stay with the company and increase her knowledge and qualifications, however she may face working with the manager for a longer period of time until a promotion arises. Lastly, should Shelia choose to apply to the OHRC, she faces a long trail of legal fees and tasks, that although costly, can end very rewardingly in the end. Again these options are only as good as they seem to Sheila Wheelah, and it is ultimately what would be best for
The legal action was meant to set precedent about a public employer’s (or any employer) responsibility when it comes to the action of employees and claims of sexual harassment. For a human resources manager there are several implications. One is to make sure everybody has a copy of not just company policies on sexual harassment but all company policies and that each employee sign and agree that s/he has read and understands them. Another implication is that there should be regular training on how to prevent harassment. Perhaps even a liaison should be appointed for “delicate” matters such as sexual harassment.
Poniatowska v Hickinbotham [2009] FCA 680 and the unsuccessful appeal against the decision (Employment Services Australia Pty Ltd v Poniatowska [2010] FCAFC 92) are remarkable cases concerning various allegations of conduct constituting sexual harassment (SH) and unlawful discrimination on grounds of sex. The reasoning of Mansfield at first instance (which is accepted by the judges at appeal) adequately addresses issues of credibility, standard of workplace policies regarding SH and discrimination, and etc. The aim of this research paper is to assess the court’s approach to the conduct alleged to constitute sexual harassment, respondent’s response to the allegations, and the assessment of damages. It will be viewed in light of the broader issues raised by the scholars regarding sexual harassment and discrimination and the Sex Discrimination Act (the SD Act).
Constructive discharge, or constructive dismissal, means that the employee resigned from their position as a result of the employer creating an intolerable and difficult environment. Constructive discharge is viewed as the employee being pressured to quit due to the employer making changes to the working conditions or responsibilities, but from a legal position, the employee quit due to forced termination, or fired without good cause. ("TimsLaw.com » Constructive Discharge - Being forced to quit - Tim 's Missouri Employment Law Info Site," n.d.)
The names and sex of all of the Junior Executive Secretaries that were terminated are important to this case. A wrongful termination, Title VII claim was brought against Greene’s. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states, individuals are protected against discrimination on bases of sex, religion, race, color, and national origin. Knowing all of the terminated Junior Executive Secretaries sex, can determine whether there was a male employee terminated as well. A male working within that title would suggest Greene’s did not terminate Ms. Lawson due to her
In the future Rogers has lots of options available to them when an employee has a complaint regarding sex discrimination. Often times letting a person go, will create more conflict, there are some simple strategies that exist to mediate the problem before it develops. Conflict management and regular meetings with employees can help limit problems in the workplace. Listening to employee feedback and consulting employees with problems can often times bring light to an underlying problem. These problems do not necessarily start and grow from within the workplace environment but have the potential to create problems with coworkers and even management. In this case Rogers had the ability to intervene before Ms. Labelle felt that she was being discriminated against. Preventative employee consulting with higher risk candidates has the potential to solve a lot of problems before then develop into something more serious. An in-depth performance review has the ability to highlight some key areas of improvement. At this point the employer and employee can set common goals and both can compromise on areas of weakness to develop them into strengths. By engaging with the employee, the employee has the chance to feel like more of a person and less of a number in larger companies such as Rogers
Diana Ross case, the court should rule in favor for Gail Davis. In my opinion, the letter could be interpreted as libelous. The combination of expressed dissatisfaction with Davis’ work habits, her erroneous inclusion among a group of people who had been terminated, and the recommendation to not hire her, could be viewed as defamatory. Nevertheless, the court dismissed the lower courts view, that the statements were mere opinion, rather than purported fact. Since the letter claimed to be based on facts and was distributed to others, it was not a mere personal opinion. Additionally, the case was remanded, therefore, the court did not consider the issue of qualified privilege, which is another defamation defense that is often relevant in work related defamation actions Walsh, 2013. P. 153). Presumably, the unsolicited distribution of the letter with its recommendation not to hire, could be viewed as both malice, and as an overly broad publication. The failure to verify the simple fact that Gail Davis had not been fired, could also be viewed as reckless disregard for the
There was evidence shown that the unfair dismissal requirements were the furthermost conflicting and inconsistent from the manager’s perspective. The Fair Work Act applied unfair dismissal requirements for entirely workers, regardless of the population of workers in the business (Chapman, 2015). The Fair Work Act presents two cases that dismissal could be reasonable, including other dismissal and summary dismissal. In the first case, the law offers a sequence of stages such as concluded checklist, copies of notice, declaration of dismissal and a witness announcement with signature that managers must follow with the intention to reduce the problem (Chapman, 2015). In the second case, managers may dismiss a worker without notice due to theft or fraud. As the consequence, the amount of cases in relation to unfair dismissal has risen significantly since the Fair Work Act implemented as law. In addition to the growing records of cases in relation to unfair dismissal, the judgements from Fair Work Australia showed some contradicting clarifications of the Fair Work Act (Chapman, 2015). According to an example, a business in Albury- Wodonga had dismissed an employee due to the breach of occupational and safety laws after an employee continually denied to wear safety glasses at work (Sloan, 2011). However, after checking the worker’s reinstatement, the Fair Work Australia stated that the worker had a family and he has found it challenging to
Jones alleged that the governor made unwanted sexual advances towards her which she explicitly rejected (Motos, 1998). Consequently, Jones reported she suffered adverse employment action by her superiors, who “treated her rudely and changed her job responsibilities” (Motos, 1998).
...ior was unprofessional and unethical as well as a potential liability, I’m sure she would have changed it. I considered confronting her about it, but did not want to avoid perception as oversensitive and lacking the same humor as my male peers. Company documentation included a sexual harassment policy, but the leader failed to connect her own behavior. Also, adopting a transformational leadership style might have been effective for this company with a focus on ethical leadership and employee feedback. Finally, email etiquette and professionalism should have been trained and adopted, while policy enforcement would have ensured this. Unfortunately, this writing does not include any positive experiences working for this company. Perhaps there would have been more had I been able to share insight after learning about some of the benefits of effective leadership.
For instance, a representative's unmistakable occupation conditions are influenced when a sexually antagonistic workplace results in her helpful release. Additionally, a boss who makes sexual advances toward a subordinate representative may convey a certain threat to unfavorably influence her employment status in the event that she doesn't go along. Hostile environment badgering may procure qualities of "quid pro quo" harassment if the culpable boss misuses his power over job choices to compel the casualty to persevere or take part in the sexual behavior. Sexual harassment may finish in a retaliatory release if a victim tells the harasser or her employer she will no more submit to the badgering, and is then terminated in striking back for this challenge. “To guarantee a work environment free from inappropriate behavior, associations can take after some essential steps. Initially, the association can build up a strategy proclamation making it clear that sexual harassment won't go on without serious consequences in the working environment. Second, all employees, new and old, can be prepared to distinguish improper working environment conduct. What's more, the association can add to a component for reporting sexual harassment in a manner that urges individuals to stand up. Finally, administration can get ready to act quickly to teach the individuals who take part in sexual harassment, and also to secure the victims of inappropriate behavior (Noe,
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) sexual harassment guidelines and the Civil Act of 1964, indicate that Susan Parker was indeed sexually harassed throughout her employment at Plastech Industries. The EEOC has created a set of guidelines that determine liability. These EEOC guidelines say that "A key factor in determining liability is whether the employer has an effective internal grievance procedure that allows employees to bypass immediate supervisors (who are often the offenders)" (Making the Sale p.46). According to the EEOC and section 703 of Title VII in the Civil Act of 1964, sexual harassment is:
Facts of the case: Anna’s immediate supervisor, Michael, repeatedly required that she have “closed door” meetings with him. Closed-door meetings violate company policy. Other employees were aware of these closed-door meetings and, as a result, rumors began to spread that Anna and Michael were having an office romance. In fact, in these closed-door meetings Michael tried to convince Anna to lend him money, a practice that also violates company policy. Anna repeatedly denied the request and Michael stopped asking. However, the rumors continued and affected Anna deeply. She was treated like an outcast by her co-workers. Anna asked Michael to clear up the rumors, but he found them amusing. Anna had two evaluations where she scored low points for “integrity” and “interpersonal relations” as a consequence of the rumors. She was passed over for two promotions for which she applied where her skills and experience were superior to the employees who were promoted. She filed an action against her employer on the ground that her supervisor had created a hostile work environment because he refused to stop the rumors.
Constructive Discharge consists of two elements: (1) the employer 's conduct must have created working conditions so intolerable that an employee is forced to resign; (2) the employer must have acted “to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization” within the meaning of section 8(a)(3).
In addition, Walsh states that “the crux of a disparate treatment case is an allegation that an employment decision was intentionally discriminatory in the sense of being based on protected class (Walsh, 2013)”. When Ms. Baker refused to fire employees simply because they were older, she was placed on probation, and ultimately released from her position. Furthermore, the reasons given to Ms. Baker at the time of her termination differed from the reasons given to the court.
In today’s workplace, sexual harassment is a growing problem. The legal definition of sexual harassment is any unwelcome sexual advance or conduct on the job that creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment. Another definition is the making of unwanted and offensive sexual advances or of sexually offensive remarks or acts, especially by one in a superior or supervisory position. Women and men of all ages, backgrounds, races and experience are harassed on the job. Sexual harassment encountered in workplaces is a hazard across the world that reduces the quality of working life, jeopardizes the well-being of women and men, undermines gender equality and imposes costs on firms and organizations.