Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on why shark culling must be banned
Effects of shark decline
What are the major contributors to the declining number of sharks
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on why shark culling must be banned
How shark culling affects the Economy
Fishermen can make very large amounts of money in the illegal shark fin trade, even the legal shark fin industry is very profitable.
Many industries are directly involved in the shark meat and shark fin industry, they depend on the demand for shark products like soup, bags, shark meat and trophies to make a living.
Fishermen involved in the illegal shark trade can stand to make over 200$ for one fin off a shark (untaxed) through the underground shark trade. Fishermen who legally bring the fins in are subject to taxation and fishing quotas and are unable to profit as much. In Hong Kong there is an 18% tax on the selling of shark fins which generates large amounts of revenue for the economy.
There are some
…show more content…
(Oceana)
In Australia with the Shark preventive measures do not necessarily make people feel more safe or more likely to take beach trips, therefore the presence of these measures to not have a significant effect on the tourism revenue in the coastal areas. (ABC)
Adversely the presence of sharks in Australia boosts the tourism revenue due to tourist wanting to do shark dives or tours and the shark ban makes it much more difficult to spot the sharks because their populations are so affected.
Because of this many dive shops and boat companies greatly opposed the shark preventive measure, the increased media coverage biased negatively towards sharks and the active reduction of the shark species make tourist less likely to come and request shark related tours and more likely to focus on reefs or whales or rays.
How Shark Culling Affects the Environment
Sharks are a key contributor in eating species of fish that consume popular commercial food like scallops, clams and shrimp.
By killing the sharks the fish that typically consume human desired food are able to reproduce and consume much more of the desired food which places strain on the ecosystem and on the fishing
…show more content…
This is a problem because the shark species that are endangered or threatened are unable to repopulate. (Sharkwater)
Sharks are culled outside of meat and fin industries for sport fishing which can have a large environmental impact due to the fact that most of the fish hunted for sport are charismatic megafauna.
The great white is an example of this phenomena. Killing and sports fishing great whites is dangerous and in some places illegal yet the desire for shark heads, stuffed or mounted sharks and sharks teeth lead to the killing of the iconic animals.
This phenomena extends to the whale shark which is much less dangerous to hunt or fish but when killed can have a large impact because the sharks take so long to grow and are often killed at the peak of their sexual maturity leading to more difficulty in repopulation and causing affects in the food chain by lessening pressure on the whale sharks prey.
Culling Sharks can be helpful for other threatened species recover from fishing and predation pressure.
There are healthy and environmental initiatives such as catching and eating local sharks in effort to help prey fish species recover from overfishing and predation from
So why do we need sharks? Well, Sharks help keep the ocean healthy and clean for over 450 million years. They also help remove half of the worlds green house gases and produces oxygen more than all of the rainforest's combined! Sharks are just as important as all the trees in the world because they have one thing in common, provide us with oxygen. Without the sharks help we wouldn't be able to get rid as much of the greenhouse gases as we want to, which means global warming would have a lower rate of happening faster. Most importantly they provide us with food. How? They would usually eat the old, sick or slower fish in the population of the ocean to the right size so the prey species don't cause harm to ecosystem by becoming to populated. They are also at the top of the food web. If all the sharks went extinct the entire food web would collapse causing many other species of fish to disappear. So instead of killing the sharks, we could lure them away to somewhere else. As they have a huge impact to the environment.
The largest issue associated with the Queensland shark control program (QSCP) in Queensland is the considerable damage it causes to marine wildlife along the coastline. It is indiscriminate when killing marine animals that swim in close proximity to the shark nets. Between 2001 – 2003, 6250 sharks were caught on drum lines alone, 97% of which were considered as a conservation risk according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Under those circumstances, it is only appropriate to preserve the lives of Sharks and acknowledge their importance to the ecosystem, because without them, the aquatic world may collapse and affect the world on the surface likewise. With the ecosystem gone, the niche of the Sharks are gone too, which lead to depletion of the rest of the marine life. This will cause much economic stress and lead to failure. We must know killing sharks are wrong, and we must stop it.
The bull shark may be responsible for many shark attacks in the world but I believe that we have no right to kill them. Sharks are very important to animals food cycles and if the food cycles get messed up it can greatly effect the world. In fact, the bull shark is more vulnerable to human impact due to their ability to live in fresh and salt water but many sharks that are killed are for either shark fin soup or their liver oil. The sharks liver oil has many uses now but it started as a machine lubricant. Another way that sharks die is by recreational fishing. The sharks can get caught up in the fishermen's nets and eventually suffocate and die. As an environmental community, I feel like we need to inform people about shark habits and how to keep sharks safe. The water is their home and we are
However, the fact is, and statistics prove that over 100 million sharks are killed every year (according to the Sea Shepherd website), all around the world and for what reason? Shark culling and the hunting of sharks as a solution to beach safety has not been well received by the Australian public. Whilst it is very clear that we need a solution to protect our bathers and surfers, the Herald Sun reported that 82 percent of all respondents to their
One of the governments main reasons for culling the sharks is because they are coming in too close to the shores and becoming a potential threat to swimmers. But why is this happening? This is due to a change in shark feeding habits, but because they are eating more human of course not! Rather because us humans are over fishing and eliminating the fish/food sources of which sharks normally feed on. This is forcing sharks to come in closer to find food. Us as humans have forced sharks to come in closer and are now killing sharks because of our a...
Shark slaughter has led to shark populations being rapidly decimated all around the globe. Fishermen report that sharks are also getting smaller because they are not being given enough time to fully mature. Although there are other fish that are targeted more than sharks, they are not exactly affected by the kind of endangerment that sharks are currently experiencin...
In 2015 only 59 shark attacks have occurred around the world compared to the millions of sharks killed by humans every year. Due to these accidental shark attacks people tend to think that sharks, especially Great Whites are evil creatures with malice intentions when attacks do occur; but, on the contrary that is wrong. Sharks are not the only beautiful and unique creatures in the ocean, they also play a vital role in our ecosystem; however, due to human interference they might not be around much longer, through awareness sharks can be protected from endangerment.
Due to the demand many packaging for the fish can find its was back to sea, or when fishermen are out at sea they can leave their garbage. Many nets from the boats and gears can also be found in the water, that fish can later see as food, eat it, and die; this ties back to extinction in fish. There is much pollution and decline stocks in fish because it is very hard to regulate the seas. To fulfill the growing demand for seafood, many companies are forced to fish beyond areas that are supposed to be non-fishing zones. This is because there are hardly any laws or restrictions telling them where they can and cannot fish. Sally Driscoll and Tom Warhol report in, ‘Overfishing’, that itt wasn’t until 1956 where we saw our first regulation, the United Nations organized the first UN Convention of the Law of the Sea or the NCLOS which helped promote rights of all countries by establishing boundaries off shore. Meaning that some seafood fished in certain areas of the ocean cannot be sold in certain countries, and in some areas it is illegal to fish unless you have a permit from that country. Economy also helps make it harder to regulate the seas, in ‘Overfishing’ it is explained that Preisdent Barack Obama brought up Antiquities Act of 1906, that let fishermen expand their fishing areas. The United Nations FAO estimates that 25 percent of all fish trapped in nets are labeled unusable or not licensed for fishing by the
Information (sub-point): Shark finning also has also drastically negatively affected the entire shark population. According to SharkSavers.org, “Shark populations face the threat of extinction in every part of the world primarily due to overfishing driven by the high demand for shark fins” (SharkSavers, 2013). It is also found that the global shark population has decreased by a drastic 90% over the last 50 years, and if change does not occur quickly, the entire shark population could potentially disappear
Thesis: Sharks should be conserved because they are an important part of the ocean, attacks are often incidental, and human behavior influences the behavior of sharks.
To summarize, shark fins consumption for benefit of health still remain as a belief. However, it has been clarified with modernized science which disproves almost all beliefs about eating shark fins. Furthermore, it causes destructive marine system without reasonable reason. People are willing to destroy specie to improve their health, invade their living areas without morality. Shark fins today is just a case study which strongly needs people’s help to maintain what they have to maintain to equalize all natural system as it play a significant part in the ocean. As a result, to solve this problem, legality will be a powerful solution to those becoming extinct creatures as they do with the animals like elephant in Thailand, or even panda in China.
The increasing frequency of shark attacks at coastal beaches in Western Australia has encouraged ongoing concern amongst beachgoers into provoking the WA state government to intervene in the matter. In the hopes of reducing such incidents and ensuring the safety beachgoers, the WA state government has responded by proposing a shark culling scheme to target great white sharks along problem areas at popular beaches. This scheme has been proposed by the state government as a preventative measure, although some members of the general public may not agree with the WA government’s approach for overcoming this issue. In light of this issue, the WA government aims to seek a resolution which appeals to the better interest of WA beachgoers, primarily in regard to their safety.
...ting the ocean in catching fish leaving almost nome left and selling it to Europe. "Losses estimated due to pirate fishing are estimated between 10 to 23.5 billion U.S.dollars per year, representing 11 and 26 million fish." (Environmental Justice Foundation, 2011). "Fish is a crucial source of protein for millions of people." (Environmental Justice Foundation, 2011). Pirate fishermen use nets they call "curtains of death" to catch hundreds of fish and kill them in the nets, coastal fishermen cannot compete with these.
The first cause of the marine extinction is coming from over-fishing and commercial fishing. According to Marine Extinction and Conservation, commercial fishing has