Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Diversity within the community
Understanding diversity within society
Freud theory evaluated
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Diversity within the community
Psychotherapists have grappled with the concept of sexual sadism and masochism for decades. In his early writings, Freud (1924) described sadomasochistic (SM) practice as a means of attaining pleasure through the administration or attainment of pain. He acknowledged that SM behavior contradicted his theories on human instincts and the pleasure principle, and ultimately attributed the behavior to the interaction of flawed aggressive instincts, unconscious Oedipal guilt, and the enigmatic death drive. His initial perspectives on SM behavior eventually informed our field’s current perspectives of SM as a form of psychopathology. To date, some researchers study SM sexual practices through a psychopathological framework that characterizes SM identity as a type of abnormal sexuality. Meanwhile other psychotherapists view the practice as linked to complicated object relations, narcissism, affect regulation, and various neurotic responses (The Clinical Problem of Masochism, 2012). Recently, researchers have pushed for a non-pathological understanding of SM behaviors. Lawrence and Love-Crowell (2008) assert that researchers and clinicians should adopt a non-judgmental and informed stance when undertaking work with SM populations. Others purpose that researchers should formulate broad, neutral, or positive definitions of SM practice (Powls & Davies, 2012). Unfortunately this initiative is hindered by society’s continued view of SM as deviant or abnormal. Additionally, SM culture and practice is not often discussed within psychology training programs. This paper will highlight empirical works that describe the history of the sadism and masochism diagnoses while acknowledging the limitations of studies in this area. Works that detail cultura... ... middle of paper ... ...r use with incarcerated individuals and it is not yet known if they would be appropriate for use in other settings. More work should be done to develop interventions that can be used with SMers who abide by the safe, sane, and consensual mantra characteristic of the SM scene. Furthermore, studies should be developed that represent the voices of female SMers as well as gender, sexual, and ethnic minority SM participants. A more well-rounded understanding of diverse communities within SM culture may lead to the development of more effective treatment methodologies. Lastly, psychologists should take note of the growing interest in the healing or “therapeutic” narratives presented in SM websites, literature, and popular media (Barker, Gupta, & Iantaffi, 2007) as these findings have been linked to psychological growth and increases in sexual self-efficacy (Bader, 1993).
Knight, Zelda G. "Sexually Motivated Serial Killers And The Psychology Of Aggression And "Evil" Within A Contemporary Psychoanalytical Perspective." Journal Of Sexual Aggression 13.1 (2007): 21-35. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. Web. 1 May 2014.
and Sexuality in US Prisons." Critical Survey 23, no. 3: 55-66. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost. doi:10.3167/cs.2011.230305
Stekel, Wilhelm, and Louise Brink. Sadism and Masochism: The Psychology of Hatred and Cruelty. 2 vols. New York: Liveright, 1953. Questia School. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
Ted Bundy’s style of killing describes sexual sadism. Sexual sadism is the intense sexually arousal by the thought or act of inflicting suffering on others by dominating, restraining, blindfolding, cutting, strangling, mutilating, or even killing the victim (Comer, 2011). This condition would fall under Axis I because it causes significant impairment.
Some psychologist believe that if a serial killer displays or kills his victims in such a way then it qualifies as fulfilling as sexual desire. These killers are usually diagnosed with a mental disorder referred to as sexual sadism. Psychologists refer to serial killers who kill in this manner as sexual sadist. A sexual sadist enjoys the ‘suffering or embarrassment of others to the point of arousal’ (Serial Killers and Sexual Sadism). Sociologists believe that a serial killer needs to “fulfil a sexual desire by turning a fantasy into a controllable reality” (Serial Killers: Nature vs. Nurture). Sadist crave the dominance and control over their victims because they feel as if they cannot control other aspects of their life. Another biological factor derives within the DNA of the person. Many killers have the “MAO-A gene (monoamine oxidase A). This gene, which has been the target of considerable research, is also known as the "warrior gene" because it regulates serotonin in the brain. Serotonin affects your mood — think Prozac — and many scientists believe that if you have a certain version of the warrior gene, your brain won't respond to the calming effects of serotonin (A Neuroscientist Uncovers a Dark Secret).” With this gene psychologist and scientist alike believe that this can foretell a serial killer before he becomes a serial
...pe, both sex and aggression become fused together into a single experience called sadism. There is a transformation of anger and power so that aggression becomes erotic. This offender finds the intentional mistreatment of his victim extremely gratifying and takes pleasure in her torment and suffering (Hazelwood 1).
Medicalization describes the shift in authority concerning abnormal human conditions. Quirks previously seen as by-products of maturation began to see heavy examination and were classified under medical terms. As a result, the past few decades have seen an obscene number of compulsions and disorders deemed medical conditions, further exacerbating the unnecessary institutionalization of many harmless irregularities. This string coincides with the growing popularity of sex addiction and the debate over its inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The mere thought of such a neurotic desire potentially joining the DSM alongside major mental and learning disorders epitomizes the depths to which society has sunk in recognition of truly straining abnormalities. The medicalization of sex addiction demonstrates the lengths at which medical authority will go to inject another fabricated disease into the blood of society.
Although Freud’s Psychosexual Development is not highly used in today’s society, it was thought to be highly educated and knowledgeable when Freud first introduced this theory. Psychosexual development is biological and the predictor of the occurrence of certain behaviours. There are a total of five stages in psychosexual development including: oral, anal, phallic, latency and genital. Proper development should occur unless individuals suffer from traumatic experiences that prevent the libidinal energy from being satisfied. Libidinal energy stems from sexual impulses. If the individual happens to suffer a traumatic experience at a specific stage they become fixated in that stage. Once an individual becomes fixated at a certain stage they develop certain character types that are the result of their fixation (Ryckman, 2013). Monica Geller-Bing, a character from the popular television series F.r.i.e.n.d.s. is fixated in the anal stage of Freud’s psychosexual development. The stages of psychosexual development will be analyzed, criticized and used to interpret Monica Geller-Bing.
The psychoanalytic perspective grew out of subsequent psychoanalytic theories (1901, 1924, and 1940) following decades of interactions with clients with the use of an innovative procedure developed by Sigmund Freud that required lengthy verbal interactions with patients during which Freud probed deep into their lives. In a nutshell, the psychoanalytic perspective looked to explain personality, motivation, and psychological disorders by focussing on the influence of early childhood experiences, on unconscious motives and conflicts, and on the methods people use to cope with their sexual and aggressive urges. The Biological perspective on the other hand looks at the physiological bases of behaviour in humans and animals. It proposes that an organism’s functioning can be described in terms of the bodily structures and biochemical processes that cause behaviour. This paper attempts to examine the similarities and differences between the psychoanalytic perspective and the biological perspective with the key focus on the core assumptions and features of these perspectives as well as their individual strengths and weaknesses.
Notman, M. T., & Nadelson, C. C. (1976). The Rape victim: psychodynamic considerations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 408-413 .
Freud (1940) was the first to do the link between sexual abuses during the childhood and adult abnormal behavior. As a result of that serial killer uses sex as a way to let out his or her anger and aggression. The sexually acts of the serial killer is not only about sex, but it is about revenge, power, and control. “Serial killers are unconsciously trying to kill off their repressed sexual pain and powerlessness. Every stab into the victim’s flesh is a stab against their own childhood sexual terror and pain, and the rage that accompanies it is a rage against those who tormented and terrorized” (Knight, 2006, p. 1199-1200).
The issue of CSA leading to sexual deviancy has been researched over the last few decades. Jacobs, Kennedy, and Meyer found that only nine papers on the subject had been published before 1970, and only ten more in the 1970’s (1997). 28 more came about in the next five years, suggesting that the topic becam...
While mental disorders are characterized by abnormal behaviors in certain people, abnormal behavior is considered by psychologists when a combination of the mentioned elements meet together: unusual or statistically infrequent; socially unacceptable or in violation of social norms; fraught with misperceptions or misinterpretations of reality; associated with states of severe personal distress; maladaptive or self-defeating; and dangerous (Nevid et al, 2011). Some would think that psychopathy is considered a mental disorder due to its characterization based on abnormal behavior but in fact isn’t classified as one by the terms of the DSM-IV. As defined in the DSM-IV, “A mental disorder is a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual and that is associated with present distress or disability or with a significantly increased risk of suffering death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom.” (Hare, 2009) Therefore, psychopaths are described as being people suffering from antisocial personality disorder and are evaluated and judged by these terms. The following paper’s goal will therefore consist of explaining what is psychopathy and its facets, how psychopathy in youth is apprehended, how psychopathy influences violence and sexual violence, as well as evaluating if psychopaths are considered by the judge to be criminally responsible.
There is not a lot of research to back up the biological perspective of sexual sadism disorder.
The American Psychiatric Association does not define atypical sexual interests as a disorder unless it causes personal distress, causes another person psychological or physical injury, or involves a person unwilling or unable to give legal consent. These distinctions were made to show that individuals who engage in atypical sexual behavior must not be inappropriately labeled as having a mental disorder. When we think of sexual orientation, we usually think of the continuum of gay, straight, and bisexual, but sexual orientation is a deep-seated attraction toward a certain kind of person. Erotic desire includes attention, attraction, fantasy, thoughts, urges, genital arousal, and behavior. It is further complicated by variations of dominance or submission, sadism and masochism, fetishes, and consent or no consent. These interests may be single or multiple, exclusive or nonexclusive, idiosyncratic or opportunistic, stable or fluid. Possible legal consequences, lack of opportunity, and unwillingness or inability to act all work to constrain our behavior. The sooner we learn this concerning human sexual behavior, the sooner we shall reach a sound understanding of the realities of sex. The reasons for our sexual choices are analyzed obsessively, imposing an undue emphasis on categorization rather than accepting the great diversity of same-sex attractions. But the act of categorizing all of these atypical sexual attractions does not mean that acting on them is either legal or morally acceptable nor unacceptable. Explanations for all of the elements of our sexual attractions are complex and probably unknowable. All research runs the risk of reductionism, but when research on sexuality focuses exclusively on genital sexual activity --to the exclusion of considerations of attraction, affection and affiliation--it falls short in understanding our