Sex-ed should teach consent.
“ ‘There’s really no clear standard yet -- what we have is a lot of ambiguity on how these standards really work in the court of law,’ said John F. Banzhaf III, a professor at George Washington University Law School” (Medina 1). This is about the highly debated subject: teaching consent in schools. Consensual is involving or carried out by mutual consent. Consent is permission, approval, or agreement. This argument is about where consent is already taught and the results, developing habits that are carried into college, and whether or not it’s abstinence that should be taught. Sex-Ed should teach about consent.
Consent should be taught from an early age, first lightly, then more detailed. “The Netherlands made
…show more content…
headlines earlier this year for their comprehensive sexuality education curriculum, which starts in schools when kids are as young as four years old. The conversation begins with having crushes and giving consent to hugs and other forms of nonsexual intimacy. In later years, the curriculum introduces conversations about self-image and gender, finally arriving at conversations about sexual orientation and contraceptive options” (Suslovic 1). Consent should be taught because this seems to be working because “The world Bank reports that the 2013 teen birth rate in the Netherlands was close to one-seventh of the U.S. teen birth rate.” (Suslovic 1). Maybe if we started to teach consent, it would lower our teen birth rate. In fact, some schools in the United States are already teaching about consent. California has schools teaching about consent.
“With gov. Jerry brown’s signature on the bill this month, California became the first state to require that all high school health education classes give lessons on affirmative consent, which includes explaining that someone who is drunk or asleep cannot grant consent” (Medina 1). Teaching about affirmative consent is important for young adults. They need to know what is consensual, and what is not. “ Kevin de leon, the California State Senate speaker pro tempore and lead sponsor of the high school legislation, said … ‘Sexual violence has always thrived in the gray areas of the law … What we want to create is a standard of behavior, a paradigm shift as much as a legal shift” (Medina 2). Creating this standard will be easier if it is taught to young adults who are just starting to experiment. “But among teenagers, who are only beginning to experiment with their sexuality, and have hazy ideas of their own boundaries, the talk tends to be about ‘hooking up’ and what the rules are. ‘kids are still establishing patterns of behavior, and they have a lot of specific concrete questions’ said Ms. Zaloom, who has written a curriculum for affirmative consent programs that is being used throughout the country” ( Medina 2-3). Teachers can answer these questions and clear up confusion, and set a standard about how consent works. If we do not teach them in High school they might carry these habits into
college. Young Adults going to college don’t know exactly what consent is or means. An article from the Washington Post writes “Many students told Kaine [a reporter] that their high school sex education classes had developed into reproductive biology but had little to say about consent or relationships, leaving them unprepared to navigate college safely” (Brown 2) to be taken advantage of, and that goes for at any age. For example “Many activists see kindergarden to 12th grade (K-12) sex education as a missed opportunity to give young people the information they need not only to defend themselves but also to avoid hurting someone else” (Brown 1) and if this is not taught “College Freshmen arrive on campus with vastly different concepts of what constitutes consensual sex and gaps in their knowledge” (Brown 1), leaving room for misinterpretation of situations, that could lead to rape/sexual violence. “One survivor, a graduate of the University of nebraska at Omaha, said she was raped repeatedly in a long-term relationship but did not realize it because she had never learned the concept of consent. She believed that if her partner wanted sex, she had no choice but to comply. ‘I grew up in public schools. We very little to no sex education’ she said. ‘ I honestly believed --and, oh my god, I can’t believe this but i did - I honestly believed that you could hurt a guy if you said no.’ That is akin to the message Sen. Timothy M. Kaine (D-Va) heard from anti-sexual-violence activists he met at the university of Virginia following the publication of a now-discredited story in Rolling Stone magazine about alleged violent rape on that campus.” (Brown 2). This behavior can be prevented by teaching young adults what consent means and where/how it’s defined. Some people may argue, it’s abstinence that should be taught “For years, health surveys have found hawaii youth are less likely to be sexually active than adolescents and teenagers nationwide, and some credit for that success must go to public school sex-ed programs that emphasize abstinence while also providing medically sound information for students who are sexually active or contemplate being so.” (Sex-ed Must Stress 1). But clearly they are not providing enough “medically sound information” considering “They were much less likely to use condoms, slightly less likely to use any form of birth control, and slightly more likely to be victims of sexual violence. Other studies highlight relatively high rates of teen pregnancy and chlamydia among Hawaii youth.” (Sex-Ed Must Stress 2). Teaching about consent and STD’s and protection could reduce the likelihood of sexual violence, teen pregnancy, and STD’s. Sex-Ed should teach about consent to improve how consent is seen in college. Some schools are already teaching about consent to create a definite standard, while reducing the risk of sexual violence, unlike other states who still believe abstinence is the way to go. Even though they are more likely to not use any form a birth control and have the highest rates for teen pregnancy and chlamydia. Teaching about consent might reduce the risk of sexual violence and educate the youth for a better, safer future in sexual activities by setting a standard all over the nation.
When it comes to monitoring and ensuring the well-being of school-aged children, the agendas of most of our nation’s parents, teachers, and public education policy makers seem to be heavily focused on topics such as bullying, drug awareness, and social development. Although each of these issues is very important and deserving of the attention it receives, there is one topic – sexual education in the public school system – that holds just as much relevance amongst today’s youth, and yet it continues to be denied the same consideration. With underage sex being one of the nation’s long-lasting taboos, one would assume that effective Sex Ed programs in the public school system would be geared towards today’s youth. Unfortunately, this does not seem to be the case, especially for those residents of the state of Florida. Reflective of the predominantly conservative mindset of the early to mid 1900s, the sex education programs in the Florida education system seem to focus primarily on “abstinence-only-until-marriage” (Support SIECUS).
“Throughout the 1980’s these arguments began to lose legitimacy as the American republic reiterated its support (Fose)”. “Although this topic is highly debated, 93 percent of Americans support “sex or sexuallity” courses being taught in high school and 84 percent supports teachings in junior high (Fose)”. More people requested sex education because of the AIDs epidemic. The AIDs epidemic cau...
The three articles above that discussed sexual consent through the lens of sexual coercion, internal and external consent and benevolent sexism have demonstrated that there is a variety of forms that sexual consent is needed in order for sexual assault to be prevented from occurring. Also it demonstrated that sexual consent already being ambiguous does not help in establishing prevention of sexual assault, when the no is not clear, since it needs to be expressed both externally through verbal an nonverbal cues but also be internal consent from the person understanding that they are giving their affirmative consent. This is similar to the article about the films, where in Dr Brod’s lecture explained that not only the person giving consent needed to be aware of how they were giving but the one’s accepting it had to know how they got it. There is a need to understand that unless people start to gain knowledge about sexual consent, the situations will be misunderstood and sexual assault can
Within the past thirty years, the courts have extended the legal parameters of rape to include the withdrawal of consent after penetration. Courts and state legislatures around the country should seek to modernize rape statutes to protect all victims of nonconsensual intercourse, regardless of when those victims manifest their lack of consent. Within English common law, a conviction of rape required evidence that the perpetrator used force or threats of force against the victim. There is much contradiction between states regarding consent. In an effort to eliminate moral ambiguity or the question of consent, an affirmative consent standard should be set into place that refines the classification of consent from “not saying no to sex” to saying yes to the sex with words or obvious enthusiastic actions.
Upon further research, it came to my attention that only 24 of the 50 states require sex education. Sex has always been a touchy subject for man to discuses, especially in an educational environment. Due to my lack of knowledge of the subject, talking about sex makes me feel vulnerable, although I know it shouldn’t. Thankfully, I have gained a new appreciation to the educational element involved with sex, through this course and the Roger hock text
This curriculum focuses on teaching young people that they have sexual rights, which include saying no, and only doing what they feel is comfortable when they feel it’s comfortable. In addition, this curriculum takes a look at gender norms, sexual orientation, dating violence, as well as the rights and responsibilities that come along with both intimate and friendly relationships. Rights-based curriculum also goes into detail and takes a look at what happens if someone was to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), HIV, or become pregnant. The curriculum completely deviates away from the traditional sex education topics, giving students a more comprehensive and complete idea about their bodies, without sugar coating the truth due to the fear of rejection and controversy
After many years of prosecuting statutory rape laws, some people are being to question whether or not these laws when concerning non-violent “sex with a minor” are actually appropriate and effective in protecting the rights of minors. The people who support statutory rape laws would argue that in any relationship where one legal aged partner is significantly older than the other, the older of the two has a greater power advantage over the younger. Thus even if a person under the age of consent agrees to sexual activity, it is still considered lawfully to be rape, because that person is not mature enough to make a well thought-out decision. Adults fear that the younger person in the relationship may be unconsciously forced emotionally, if not physically, into engaging in sexual acts with their partner. According to the Taking Sides (Issue 17), “Statutory rape laws are designed, in part, to keep these types of unequal relationships from becoming human nature.”
Think it is a bad thing, and in reality it isn 't if we didn 't have sex none of us would be here and if students are taught the right things about the subject and educated on the facts they will get a better understanding and know what to do if the situation approaches them (Rushowy 1). “Markham said the broader concept of consent could be added early on by talking to younger students about respectful relationships and boundaries around their bodies.” On the other hand this worries parents about how their children will respond to learning about these things, and about how the teacher is teaching it. because it might not be the way they want their children to learn about this subject (Keenan 1). “Schools interpret (the mandate) in different ways.” and this comes with such problems as, “leaving the sexual education curriculum up to the individual districts a...
Levine, Judith. Harmful to minors: the perils of protecting children from sex. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
There has been a heated debate over the years on whether sex education should be taught at schools instead of abstinence-only. Many believe that talking about sex in the classroom raises the initiation of such behavior, and by stressing discipline, self-control, and self-respect, advocates argue, abstinence-only programs build character in students. Others believe that ignoring the subject keeps teens in the dark which leads them to make unsafe decisions when they become sexually active. In order to fix this problem schools should teach Sex Education, but emphasize that abstinence is the only 100 percent effective way to prevent pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.
In the United States, there is a rising problem that is not going anywhere anytime soon, that is if we, as citizens, don 't change it. This problem is causing billions of dollars and people 's futures all because schools would rather teach ignorance than the truth. What’s the problem? Sex education. Although sex education may not seem like a rising conflict, it is actually one of the top controversial topics in our country regarding education. According to Brigid McKeon, “Each year, U.S. teens experience as many as 850,000 pregnancies, and youth under age 25 experience about 9.1 million sexually transmitted infections (STIs)” (McKeon). This number is so unbelievable to any sane person, but somehow schools still won 't take the initiative to teach realistic sex education. Sex education can be taught in two different procedures- comprehensive or abstinence only. The difference between the two methods is that comprehensive sex education teaches abstinence as a secondary choice, so that teens who decide not to wait are well educated on how to keep themselves protected. Comprehensive sex education should be required in every single public school because it is the most effective method on how to keep teenagers well informed and prepared.
Martinez, Gladys, Joyce Abma, and Casey Copen. “Educating Teenagers About Sex In The United States”. CDC.GOV. Center of Disease Control and Prevention, 15 Sept. 2010. Web. 09 Feb.2014
I believe that schools should teach sexual education. I think this because kids that are in school during this age do know or respect the dangers of being sexual active. They don 't know what it means to be protected, They will know about their own bodies and that of other genders. I believe they will have a new found respect for themselves and others. Teaching about it encourages students to develop themselves into better people. Anyone who values themselves and others are better equipped to develop great relationships with others. Pupils are able to take great positive approaches to managing their lives and develop skills that are needed to prepare them for the challenges that lay ahead. Not all parents inform their children about sexual
The debate about what should be taught to the children is another issue; as is, how much of that information should be taught. Currently, eighteen states and the District of Columbia require schools to provide sex education and thirty-two do not. In some states, such as Louisiana, students may learn about HIV/AIDS, but not about any other sexually transmitted infections or how to prevent pregnancy. In other states, like Washington, teens receive information on everything from birth control pills to homosexuality. However, this once again raises the question about who should be educateing these children about sex and how to do it.
Sex education should be increased in schools. Nearly one million women under the age of 20 get pregnant each year. That means 2800 women get pregnant each day. If students are educated about the effects sex has on their lives, it lessens their chance of having children at an early age. Knowledge about sex can also lessen the chance of kids receiving STDS.