Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the importance of rule of law
The cases of rule of law
Significance and sources of judicial independence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the importance of rule of law
‘…If you maltreat a penguin in the London Zoo, you do not escape prosecution because you are the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.’
The rule of law broadly requires; that all are equal before the law , that the government is subject to the law and must exercise its power according to the law, finally that ‘there exist fundamental individual liberties and minimum standards of justice, to which the law must conform’ . The rule of law is problematic to define but put simply it is not ‘the rule of men’ and is evident in societies with functioning judiciaries and a clear separation of powers such as New Zealand. It is one of several intrinsic attributes of our constitutional makeup and overall the Judiciary aid in ‘ensure[ing] that the rule of law is maintained’ .
The judiciary is both part of and upholds the rule of law, it is however the lesser of the three branches of government yet nevertheless a force to be reckoned with in checking that the rule of law is upheld. The judiciary can be viewed as analogous to the Rule of law. It is both consummate, in checking and balancing the two other branches of government against arbitrarily abusing the citizenry. Disparate, in that the judiciary is not democratically elected and its inherent common law powers can create ‘judge made law’8888. The Lands Case , and the offending section 9 of the SOE Act highlights the legislature inviting the judiciary to create the ‘principles’ of the Treaty of Waitangi as the statute left the definition up to the judiciary to define, therefore not in conflict with the Rule of Law and the supremacy of parliament.
However in Baigent’s Case Cooke P created a remedy for breaches of the Bill of Rights even though no such clause existed. In the same vain ...
... middle of paper ...
...rule of law.
Works Cited
Bingham, Tom. The Rule of Law. Allen Lane, 2010.
Dorset, Simon. Public Law. 3rd ed. Butterworths student companion. Wellington [N.Z.]: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2002.
Gray, John. Lawyer's Latin. 2nd ed. Robert Hale Ltd, 2006.
McDowell, Morag. The New Zealand Legal System: Structures and Processes. 4th ed. Wellington, N.Z: LexisNexis, 2006.
Morris, Grant. Law Alive: The New Zealand Legal System in Context. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press, 2008.
———. Law Alive: The New Zealand Legal System in Context. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Palmer, Geoffrey, and Matthew Palmer. Bridled Power: New Zealand's Constitution and Government. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, USA, 2004.
Spiller, Peter. Butterworths New Zealand Law Dictionary. 6th ed. Wellington, N.Z: LexisNexis NZ, 2005.
Blair, Annice. Law in Action: Understanding Canadian Law. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Education Canada, 2003. Print.
“ ….Judgments, right or wrong. This concern with concepts such as finality, jurisdiction, and the balance of powers may sound technical, lawyerly, and highly abstract. But so is the criminal justice system….Law must provide simple answers: innocence or guilt, freedom or imprisonment, life or death.” (Baude, 21).
Watson, I 2000, ‘Kaldowinyeri-Munaintya: in the beginning’, Flinders Journal of Law Reform, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3-17.
There are four sources of Law in the Australian Legal System. They are Statute Law, which is made in Parliament, Common Law and the Law of E...
Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the operation of the legal system and the manner in which the powers of the state are exercised. However, since the Parliament is capable of making any law whatsoever, the concept of the rule of law poses a contradiction to the principle of parliamentary supremacy, entailing that Parliament is not bound by the Rule of Law, and it can exercise power arbitrarily.
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
The Australian legal system, through the process of law reform, aims to keep the nation a safe which, to a significant extent, is effective in creating a more just society. The Law reform, is the process of introducing changes to existing laws in the legal system. In order to suit contemporary society, laws are improved to in which reflects societal values and thus, accommodate the needs of majority of Australia. However, there are instances where the legal system may not be as effective in these changes. Issue such as the native title, marriage equality and the lock out laws cases can justify whether the law reform is effective.
On one hand, political constitutionalists argue that parliamentary sovereignty is the underlying principle in the British constitution as power and law making are bo...
The English legal system is ostensibly embedded on a foundation of a ‘high degree of certainty with adaptability’ based on a steady ‘mode’ of legal reasoning. This rests on four propositions
Rackley, E (2010). In Conversation with Lord Justice Etherton: Revisiting the Case for a More Diverse Judiciary. Public Law
Judicial review seeks to enforce and uphold constitutional doctrines which govern the UK’s uncodified constitution by scrutinising administrative action. One constitutional function of judicial review is to enforce the rule of law. It can be argued, in defining the rule of law as “negative value...designed to minimised the harm to freedom and dignity which the law may cause in its pursuit of its goals” Joseph Raz characterised judicial review. The principle of which states the executive is to be ruled by the law and subject to it.
Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials by Andrew Le Sueur, Maurice Sunkin and Jo Murkens (Paperback - 12 Aug 2010) chapter 8 p 368-418
Cheyne, C., O’Brien, M., Belgrave, M. (2008). Social Policy: In Aotearoa New Zealand (4th ed). Australia and New Zealand: Oxford University Press
One of the biggest threats to a thriving country is a tyrannical government. To prevent this, the Founders declared that the power of the government must be separated. This principle, the Separation of Powers, states that, to prevent tyranny, one governmental branch cannot have supremacy over the country. The power must be divided among three branches. These are the executive, judicial, and legislative branches. The Separation of Powers is of equal importance now as when the Constitution was written because it prevents tyranny.
The rule of law is thought to be one of the most fundamental doctrines of the constitution of the whole of the United Kingdom. The distinctive UK‘s constitution has influences previously on the judicial system too. Government and the legal systems in history have both been involved in rules and discretion and most of all the elimination of all discretionary power in which both of these are impossible and unwanted. The rule of law means in one sense, government by the law but obviously government is by the people as well as by the law. As soon as the governing people are added in, the government can’t then be by law on there own. Although the situation is not undoubtedly as the making of particular laws can be guided by open and relatively stable general laws that have been made. For the Rule of Law to have meaning in a democratic society, it has to mean that those who run it have comply with it for it to work; there must be no room for an “ends justifies the means”