Separation Of Powers In Healthcare Organizations

1072 Words3 Pages

Ethics in healthcare can be defined “as a set of moral principles and rules of conduct for health professionals to follow” (Ledlow & Stephens, 2018). The ethics committees complete task such as “increasing patient satisfaction, improving employee morale, enhancing productivity, conserving resources/avoiding costs, improving accreditation reviews, reducing ethics violations, reducing risk of lawsuits, sustaining corporate integrity, and safeguarding the organization’s future” (Caulfield, 2007). As a healthcare organization, these nine tasks are imperative and important. Outside of the roles of this committee, the members have their normal roles to also take on. By having the addition responsibility, we also must understand that we cannot do …show more content…

Separation of powers states that the three branches of government should be divided into three different branches so that the power amongst them do not overlap. In lament terms, “If the body that made the laws could also enforce them and adjudicate disputes, it would likely do so in a preferential manner, undermining the rule of law and basic fairness. [So, because of this], power, in other words, must be checked, or it will be abused.” (Shaw, 2012). In this case, although we made the decision to add these three social workers to the committee, they cannot just come in and overturn our decision just because they saw fit. They do not have the power to do so. They are just here to consult us and advise us on what changes that will need to be made for the betterment of the committee and once they advise the committee chairman of the decision, he could either tell the hospital administration to see what they say or just do away with the decision in full. To “modernize” the structure does not mean to make the decisions on their …show more content…

I would not designate someone in this position without doing the correct amount of research and without approval. No matter who I bring in, they are not going know the ways of the committee and they are not going to certainly learn overnight. I would work with the committee to help them understand that the decision was not personal, but it was needed not only for the committee but for the patients and employees benefit. I must advise them that the reason I was hired was not to create corruption but to keep the company up to date with other hospitals and their committee involvement. They needed an outside eye and I agree to be that for them, because this decision is needed. They must allow me to do my job and give me room to motivate them to do

Open Document