Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of industrialization on the environment
Motivation and human nature
The effects of industrialization on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of industrialization on the environment
In order for an action to occur there has to be a force to cause that action. The purpose of this paper is to argue that selfishness is the consistent force that motivates all action. However, I will simply start by setting out to prove that all action occurs because of a motivating factor and if there is no potential reward for an action, no action will occur. If this is the case, it eliminates the chance that a few actions are completely unmotivated by any factor therefore, proving there has to be a force guiding human action. In this case I feel that the classroom is an excellent way to demonstrate this necessary cause and effect. Generally the motivating factor to do schoolwork is to get a good grade in a class, so kids do their homework. …show more content…
This is often displayed through actions motivated by an extrinsic reward such as wealth or status. Consequently, evil action occurs for selfishly motivated reason. People want to benefit themselves and seek reward for their actions; therefore, individuals will commit actions that benefit themselves at the expense of others. The fact that someone is able to cause harm to others for personal gain is indicative of the selfishness of humans. This directly selfish or dark side of human nature is readily displayed by the state of industry in countries such as the United States of America. The potential reward of financial gain is enough to motivate humans to commit terrible actions to benefit themselves. Industry is destroying the planet we live on, through pollution and global warming, for the benefit of a few wealthy individuals and at the detriment of everyone. While it would be expensive and time-consuming to implement a greener industry sector; at the base of these arguments against change, is the fundamental greed of those that have the most to lose economically, if the world took great steps to become more environmentally friendly. Hence, humans are shown to be at their core selfish, through their directly greedy actions that are detrimental to the majority of humans. However, this is just
Adam Smith’s moral theory explains that there is an “impartial spectator” inside each of us that aids in determining what is morally and universally good, using our personal experiences and human commonalities. In order to judge our own actions, we judge and observe the actions of others, at the same time observing their judgments of us. Our impartial spectator efficiently allows us to take on two perceptions at once: one is our own, determined by self-interest, and the other is an imaginary observer. This paper will analyze the impartiality of the impartial spectator, by analyzing how humans are motivated by self-interest.
One day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is not a book about a superhuman. It is not a story about someone who is weaker and more desperate than everyone else. It is not a tale of greatness, nor is it about extraordinary faults. Instead, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn chose to center his story around Ivan denisovich Shukhov, an average, unnoticeable Russian prisoner.
Selfishness is a disease of the soul that every person experiences several times throughout their life. To say that it has never been experienced would be hypocrisy. To say that it is a “good thing”, would be erroneous. Although as humans we like to lie to ourselves, it is no question that selfishness can make any person act like a fool. It consumes us and makes us into someone we are not. Whether it leads to getting people killed, falling in love, or buying alcohol, selfishness always leads to destruction.
Vallerand R., Fortier M. & Guay F. (2000) School motivation for teens. Journal of Education Today, December 2000
Thomas Hobbes is one of these people support this idea. Hobbes, in the book Leviathan, suggests that human beings are primarily selfish since they are driven by their passions (appetites and fears) and that what is good is nothing but the satisfaction of one’s passions, which is often attained when reason is employed merely as a tool or as an instrument to satisfy our passions. To support his claim, the classic game theory match-up known as the Prisoner 's Dilemma, is show the selfish strategies in human. When playing this game, if both players cooperate, they both receive an equal payoff. But if one cooperates and the other does not, the cooperating player receives the smallest possible payoff, and the defecting player the largest. If both players do not cooperate, they both receive a payoff, but it is less than what they would gain if both had cooperated. In general it pays to cooperate, but it can pay even more to be selfish. (express.co.uk.) However, the experiment claims that when they give more time, the player will be more selfish. It is doesn’t mean that human born selfish because they have lots of time to think, and chose what’s best for them. How about let them make a
• Once more, the ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest. Ethical egoism as diametrically opposite of ethical altruism which obliges a moral agent to assist the other first, even if sacrifices own interest. Also, ethical egoism differs from both rational and psychological egoism in ‘defending’ doctrine which considers all actions with contributive beneficial effects for an acting individual
The behavior of altruism in an individual is when it brings more costs than benefits for the benefit of another individual. Altruism comes from the Latin word "Alter" which means "the others." This translation of alturism describes it relatively well. Another great definition of altruism can be found in a statement of Edward Osborne Wilson, an American biologist. According to Wilson, "Altruism is defined in biology, as in everyday life, as a self-destructive
Egoism is a teleological theory of ethics that sets the ultimate criterion of morality in some nonmoral value (i.e. happiness or welfare) that results from acts (Pojman 276). It is contrasted with altruism, which is the view that one's actions ought to further the interests or good of other people, ideally to the exclusion of one's own interests (Pojman 272). This essay will explain the relation between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. It will examine how someone who believes in psychological egoism explains the apparent instances of altruism. And it will discuss some arguments in favor of universal ethical egoism, and exam Pojman's critque of arguments for and against universal ethical egoism.
Well, wouldn’t it be convenient if we all hid behind one book that provided us with the universal excuse that we are all selfish bastards and thus can do whatever we want? If it was that easy to proclaim as Skilling, former CEO of Enron, that selfishness cannot be helped due to genes, there would be no more true need for parenting, socializing, being part of an institution, obeying laws and much more. We would just be sitting around, waiting like hyenas for our next prey to apply our awesome selfishness on and further our genes. Cowardice to the highest level, that is what Skilling and the culture of Enron represented. When attempting to account for his actions and the way he conditioned the culture in Enron, he stated that his favorite book the “Selfish Gene” informed his approach. Wait, I thought Harvard graduates could read…because if that’s the case, how did he miss pages over pages of information where the book itself stated that while we are born selfish, we can be taught to be altruistic; and rebel against those genes and not let them control our bodies, lives, and actions. Of course he would use just a limited portion to make his case. Selective selfishness much? Maybe Mr. Skilling could not read too well because his eyes were already in the shape of dollar signs. If that is the case, I apologize. We will respectfully call that the Ignoratium Greed disability and leave it at that.
Previously, parents quickly taught their children the importance of sharing and considering others’ needs before their own. They expected their offspring to submissively sacrifice incongruent desires and wishes. Parents did not tolerate selfishness from anyone at anytime. Then came the millennials, also called the me generation. The typical millennial, concerned only with his or her own happiness, pursues self satisfaction relentlessly. They only reflect upon their fellow man’s needs when it benefits them. Millennials have been called lazy, selfish, and worthless by their peers. This leads one to ponder selfishness’ roots, how it became such an undesirable trait and whether or not it actually impairs society. Through Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand argues the sensibility and appropriateness of selfishness.
With the development of modern society, many people say that the society has become miserable, and people only care their own profit. The self-interest is becoming the object of attacking. Thereupon, when we mention self- interest, people always mix up the concept of self-interest with selfishness. As we all known, the idea of selfishness is, “Abusing others, exploiting others, using others for their own advantage – doing something to others.” (Hospers, 59) Selfish people have no ethics, morals and standards when they do anything. At the same time, what is self – interest? Self- interest can be defined as egoism, which means a person is, “looking out for your own welfare.” (Hospers, 39) The welfare people talk about is nothing more than
Selfishness and materialism have always been seen in a negative light by society as a whole. However, where would we be without it? One possibility would be that our society would stagnate, for no one would have the motivation to do anything greater out of self-interest. In Animal Farm by George Orwell, Mollie was interested in how the Rebellion would affect her more than anything else, but her selfishness allowed her an advantage. Before the Rebellion, she was the center of attention, afterwards she was unaccustomed to everyone being equal, and her selfishness and self-interest was really shown.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum
The thoroughly selfish man aims at obtaining as much happiness as he can for himself and does not care whether other People are happy or miserable. In order to attain this object, he tries to appropriate as large a share as possible of the good things of this world. Whenever he has as opportunity of doing so he enjoys himself, even when his enjoyment is obtained at the expense of his fellow-men. History gives many conspicuous instances of selfishness in the case of despotic monarchs taught by their flatterers to think that they had nothing else to do in the world but seek the gratification of their appetites.
Before a case can be made for the causes of altruism, altruism itself must first be defined. Most leading psychologists agree that the definition of altruism is “a motivational state with the ultimate goal of increasing another’s welfare.” (Batson, 1981). The only way for a person to be truly altruistic is if their intent is to help the community before themselves. However, the only thing humans can see is the actions themselves, and so, selfish intent may seem the same as altruistic intent. Alas, the only way that altruism can be judged is if the intent is obvious. Through that, we must conclude that only certain intents can be defined as altruistic, and as intent stemming from nature benefits the group while other intent benefits yourself, only actions caused by nature are truly altruistic.