Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction-Impacts of social media
Introduction-Impacts of social media
Effects Of Social Media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction-Impacts of social media
In modern society, a phenomenon called the herd mentality is increasingly more prevalent on the likes of social media and acts as a subtle means of regulating a group of people through self-surveillance. Social media, particularly platforms such as Twitter and Snapchat, is a practice that has been moulded into the collective mindset through confessions to regulate society. Foucault’s theories of power and discipline lay provide a foundation for social media to create an imitation of a prison like self-surveillance and reflection on the unassuming public.
Foucault saw power and knowledge as a means in which to control a body through disciplinary power. In order to understand Foucault’s theories on power, one must understand Jeremy Bentham’s
…show more content…
The act of confession originated from the Christian Church during the medieval times, it was a means in which people would repent for their sins and wrong doing. He suggested that the confession creates the truth within individuals. The act consists of a person confessing their sins to a priest, however the one who is changed is the confessor themselves (Foucault 61-62, 116). The confessor willingly brings forward these sins instead of an authority figure giving blame and results in a form of self-surveillance. Just as the panopticon creates an atmosphere of perpetual stalking/surveillance, that very paranoia stimulates an obedient society (Lyon 59). The act of confessing to wrong doings has spread far beyond the reach of the church confessional and prisons into everyday lives. Foucault used the confessional to demonstrate how power is fractured. It doesn’t just start from the top but it also originates from within everyone. Individuals have the opportunity to dictate and create power when expressing themselves, as power is just set of relations on how we act and talk. In our current society, crimes are not the only thing that we confess; feelings, dreams and motivations are just a few (Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 198; Marwick 382). Our society has become conditioned into validation by our fellow peers while creating a false sense of power and …show more content…
The many pairs of eyes on each individual at any given moment of the day is synonymous with the concept of the panopticon and it leads to self-surveillance of individuals (Marwick 379; Lyon 60). There is no better time in history to have a person’s daily life sprawled out for the rest of the world to see. Facebook, Instagram, snapchat, twitter: collectively these sites have turned society into stalkers by habit (Marwick 379). Primarily, twitter has become the “confessional” of the modern day as the site is thought to be the virtual version of an online diary. Tweets, short posts that are the main form of media on this site, often convey whatever is on a person’s minds within (what use to be 140 characters) 280 characters or less. Conversely, a site such as snapchat offers quick and highly stylised peeks into a person’s lifestyle. Quite literally speaking, with each snap (photo or video) lasting anywhere from 1- an infinite amount of seconds. However, once it has been opened, it will terminate shortly thereafter. Snapchat allows cameras to be inundated in a person’s life, for lens to provide “eyes” into another’s life. It reigns in a person’s behaviour to be showcased. At the very least, creates a snippet of a person’s life to fit an illusion of a perfectly exciting profile – a modified truth (Marwick 381). In both cases, what is posted is thought about
For most everybody in the world, people tend to have two identities: one in reality and one online. Andrew Lam wrote an essay, called “I Tweet, Therefore I am: Life in the Hall of Mirrors”, in which he described how people are posting videos or statuses which is making social media take a turn. Instead of social media being a place to share very little information, people are now tending to post weird updates. Lam was describing an example where a boy that was going to surgery asked to have his picture taken because his arm got taken off by an alligator. Another example is when Bill Nye was speaking and collapsed from exhaustion. Most of the crowd took their phones out and recorded videos instead of helping Bill Nye out (540-541). With the power of the internet at everyone’s fingertips, most everyone is trying to make the most of it. With all
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
The presence of guilt has been felt by all human beings. As guilt grows in a
Among the books discussed over the duration of the course, the most recurrent theme has been the dominance of power relationships and the construction of institutions driven by power. The framework for these socially ingrained power relationships that has been transformed over time has been laid out by Michel Foucault in his book Discipline and Punish. According to Foucault, power is everywhere, dispersed in institutions and spread through discourses. The state functions on a number of dispositions which are hierarchical, naturalized and are the modes of power for the power elite. The result of this social and economic control is observed in nations and across nations through the beauty myth, the prison system, the creation of informal systems or the overarching cultural hegemony and attempted reform of the non-western world. The key to the success of this has been through the misrecognition of the constructed systems of power which are instated through very fundamental mediums that they are not questioned. These structures of control by the state are adopted and reproduced from the base of the familiar, through arrangements and dispositions that pose themselves as natural, as they are embodied and programmed in the play of language, in common sense, and in all what is socially taken for granted. In this essay I will examine these above mentioned structures of the power and how these models are used to discipline individuals and states.
The discussion starts from the Roman Catholic Church, when priests call for followers to confess their sinful deepest desires. As evidence, Foucault brings up the book “My Secret Life”, anonymously written during the 19th century, describing the sex life of a Victorian gentleman. At the start of the 18th century, there was a political and economical incitement to talk about sex, with experts talking both moralistically and rationally about sex, with governments becoming aware that they were not merely managing subjects, but a population, and as such they had to concern with birth and death rates, marriage, contraception, and as a matter of fact,
(Flynn 1996, 28) One important aspect of his analysis that distinguishes him from the predecessors is about power. According to Foucault, power is not one-centered, and one-sided which refers to a top to bottom imposition caused by political hierarchy. On the contrary, power is diffusive, which is assumed to be operate in micro-physics, should not be taken as a pejorative sense; contrarily it is a positive one as ‘every exercise of power is accompanied by or gives rise to resistance opens a space for possibility and freedom in any content’. (Flynn 1996, 35) Moreover, Foucault does not describe the power relation as one between the oppressor or the oppressed, rather he says that these power relations are interchangeable in different discourses. These power relations are infinite; therefore we cannot claim that there is an absolute oppressor or an absolute oppressed in these power relations.
More easily understood Foucault is presenting forth the idea of hegemony, or the thought that power structures exist because everyone buys into them. For example, women’s dress in business situations. For the most part, women are expected to dress in nigh uncomfortable clothes in the work place: skirts, heels, makeup (to a degree). Women accept this, men accept this, and everyone in society accepts this as a norm. Because it is seen as “normal” rather than something forced upon women by a group, other women will police their peers: sharp looks, snide comments, etc. This norm is policed by those who are trapped by it and they never think about why it is they are required to dress as they
...easily controls and manipulates the way individuals behave. Although there are no true discourses about what is normal or abnormal to do in society, people understand and believe these discourses to be true or false, and that way they are manipulated by powers. This sexual science is a form of disciplinary control that imprisons and keeps society under surveillance. It makes people feel someone is looking at them and internally become subjective to the rules and power of society. This is really the problem of living in modern society. In conclusion, people live in a society, which has created fear on people of society, that makes people feel and be responsible for their acts. Discourses are really a form in which power is exercised to discipline societies. Foucault’s argument claims discourses are a form of subjection, but this occurs externally not internally.
Foucault discusses the whole idea of power stressing much on the positions of those people who hold power in any societal setting and how they relate with their subjects to try and ensure that the power is exercised effectively without abandoning or neglecting a section of the subjects being ruled. He also discusses the issue of sex and connects it to power giving details of how sex and politics interrelate. Foucault, in his discussion, gives a detailed analysis on the relationship between power and objectives that those holding power seek to achieve in the long run. He goes ahead to describe the tactics that those in power and generally politics need to employ in order to realize results in view of both the governors and the governed. In his
In Foucault’s analysis, the concept of Panopticon is developed based on the manipulation of knowledge and power as two coexisting events. He believes that knowledge is obtained through the process of observation and examination in a system of panopticon. This knowledge is then used to regulate the behaviors and conduct of others, creating an imbalance in power and authority. Not only can knowledge create power, power can also be used to define knowledge where the authority can create “truth”. This unbalance of knowledge and power then marks a loss of power for the ends being watched, resulting in an unconditional acceptance of regulations and normalization.
Facebook, Twitter and other social platforms have become one of the central activities in human affairs. Used by people around the world promoting communication, social media gives scope to everyone to exhibit their ideas and thoughts. The plethora of social platforms is a revolutionary invention that is changing the way of how people moderate and communicate with others in their daily lives. Although many people admire this revolutionary concept, it can be argued that it has a negative impact on society. Extensive usage of social media can cause addiction, affecting productivity, and also reduce the level of human interaction, which in turn leads to isolation. Social media is correlated to many of the issues that revolve feminism and mental illness through anthropology, sociology and psychology.
Introduction Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman’s work was centralised around two different concepts of how your identity is formed through the process of power and expert knowledge. This Essay will discuss the ideas of Michel Foucault, a French Social Theorist. His theories addressed the relationship between power and knowledge and how both of these are used as a form of social control through society. The essay will look at Foucault’s work in The Body and Sexuality, Madness and Civilisation and Discipline and Punish, which displays how he conceptualised power and identity on a Marxist and macro basis of study. The Essay will also address the Ideas of Erving Goffman, a Canadian Born Sociologist who’s key study was what he termed as interactional order, that is how the functions of ritual and order of every individual member of society, in everyday life, interact to form social order.
They are not only its inert or consenting target; they are always also the elements of its articulation” (Foucault, “Two Lectures” 34). Power may take various forms, all of which are employed and exercised by individualsand unto individuals in the institutions of society. In all institutions, there is political and judicial power, as certain individuals claim the right to give orders, establish rules, and so forth as well as the right to punish and award. For example, in school, the professor not only teaches, but also dictates, evaluates, as well as punishes and rewards.
“Power is exercised only over free subjects, and only insofar as they are free. By this we mean individual or collective subjects who are faced with a field of possibilities in which several ways of behaving, several reactions and diverse compartments may be realized.” (Foucault)
At this point we can determine the purpose of Foucault’s question, “what is critique”? Foucault’s definition of critique provides a tool to find cracks in power-knowledge relationships by analyzing the genealogy of a power knowledge relationship. Foucault states “we have to deal with something whose stability, deep rootedness and foundation is never such that we cannot in one way or another envisage, if not its disappearance, then at least identifying by what and from what its disappearance is possible” (65). Foucault believes that using his method of critique a power and knowledge relationship is not permanent. Questioning and knowledge can be used to remove the leash from authority.