Self Discovery In Invisible Man

1230 Words3 Pages

Institutionalized racism in the early 1940s, New York society took a major role in the Invisible Man, where the lack of acknowledgment towards identity and the complete cycle of the archetypical journey relate to the process of the invisible man’s departure into self-discovery. The author, Ralph Ellison, addresses how naturally racism is implemented in this era and how it often went unnoticed. Ellison stipulated the archetypical cycle through the main character and expressed how it has affected his journey regarding self-discovery and finding his identity. Though it may have been subtle to most, racism lingered on heavily throughout this growing society consisting both of white men, seen as the majority, and black men, seen as the minority. Invisible Man reveals the impact society has on identity, race, and one’s journey, revolving around how one man’s excursion into self-discovery affected his success and accomplishments in life. The main character yearned to influence his surroundings in some way, following the archetypical cycle, but diminished his self once his inner discovery of invisibility unraveled.
Ellison condones a connection with Booker T. Washington in Invisible Man residing in chapter one when the narrator enlightens the readers of his grandparents: "About eighty-five years ago they were told that they were free, united with others of our country in everything pertaining to the common good, and, in everything social, separate like the fingers of the hand" (Invisible Man, pg 5). This is a straight forward reference to Washington’s 1895 Atlanta Compromise speech, when he articulated, "In all things purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all thing essential to mutual progress." This ...

... middle of paper ...

...rely distinguished.
Ellison distinguishes the archetypical journey and broadens the view of how race and invisibility conforms. Invisible Man is a narrative regarding truthfulness and an endeavor to characterize the actuality of the open human race. Though the narrator is depicted as the protagonist, or hero, and finally has a last and final discovery that his world is filled with “infinite possibilities”, his refusal to be the invisible man whose body is manipulated by various social groups represents his lack of conformity and incompletion of the archetypical cycle, where he evidently does not find a name for himself, but a new beginning to his self-discovery. The narrator recognizes that he obligation to respect his “individual complexity” (Howe, 2001) and continue to be genuine to his own distinctiveness without surrendering his trustworthiness to the society.

Open Document