Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on self deception
Essays on self deception
Essays on self deception
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on self deception
Blind or Blindsided Self-deception is “the inability to see that one has a problem.” Arbinger Institute (2010-01-11). Marquis Shoreline (MS) is a place where I once resided for nearly two-years. During that time-span, I experienced burglary to one of my garage spaces and an infestation of bugs in my apartment every time someone moved out of the places nearby. Regardless, of the issues I experienced (i.e. loud music, neighbors arguing, assistant managers lies, burglary, scratches on my car), I always paid on time and reported things that needed maintenance or managements attention, but did not receive the same courtesy from the workers of this organization. While putting in a request to relocate from MS, I was told by management, that if I move out before my lease end date, I would incur a large re-letting fee. Since, I only had five more weeks to pay for, I decided to keep the place until my lease ended or management …show more content…
rented the space. Fortunately, the apartment was rented within days of our conversation, but I now had a week and a half to get out instead of five weeks. After finishing up by the day I was asked to move out so they can prepare the place for the new tenants, I was sent the last statement.
It was much lower than I expected. I thanked God for his favor and was extremely appreciative for the workers’ at MS for finalizing things so quickly. I paid my last bill and received confirmation of payment. This was one of the happiest moments of my life this year. Subsequently, I received a noticed stating that the system did not charge my account the re-letting fee, so they will have to resend me a new final statement with that fee included. My heart dropped. I felt completely blindsided by this even though I had a conversation with management before ever making the decision to move. Self-deception is a process of denying or rationalizing away the relevance, significance, or importance of opposing evidence and logical argument (Wiki). My thoughts were, I paid the final bill in full and received confirmation that the balance is zero. “I could see matters only from my own closed perspective” (Location
352). What does the Bible have to say about self-deception, and how would this have changed (or not changed) your behaviors in the situation above? The New International Version of the Bible says in Jeremiah 17:9, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?” I understand the error that was made, but I do not agree with having to pay a new final statement. Then I read scriptures like Proverbs 16:18 where it states, “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” and I rethink the situation. I do not want to be like the person the feeds on ashes; a deluded heart that has been led astray and cannot deliver myself, like in Isaiah 44:20. Instead, I choose to be like a doer who acts and is blessed in doing so (James 1:25). It is because of my belief in the word of God that I ever considered making payment to a bill that was originally zeroed out.
Are everyday rituals, such as, facades reflected as to being a lie? Simply preparing for a meeting or interview does not come off as lying, although another type of façade such as when someone asks, “Are you okay,” after a death of someone close to you, in reality it is a form of a lie, because you are not being honest. In Stephanie Erricsson’s article “The Ways We Lie,” she discusses many different types of lying, that most wouldn’t even consider. Ericsson claimed, “But façades can be destructive because they are used to seduce others into an illusion” (409). Depending how a façade is used, the outcome can be beneficial or damaging. There are facades that are used to cover up one’s true feelings, in order to protect an individual and then there is a type in which one puts on a mask to cover up how awful of a person they are. Charity, a former friend, deceived me with the qualities of everything she was not, my mom is a great example of when it comes to hiding when she is saddened. In this article “The Ways We Lie,” Stephanie Ericsson has a great point of view on the destructiveness of facades, although, it can very well be used in a good way just as much as in a bad way, in fact, like my protective mother, using facades for mine and my sisters own good and then a conniving friend using facades in
“Leadership and Self-Deception: Getting out of the Box” by The Arbinger Institute is about the culture of a company, Zagrum, and how the culture has contributed to it’s success. The concept that Zagrum relies on is ridding the company of “people problems” as a result from “being in the box”. The book talks about being in the box and what it means, how you get in the box, and how you get out of the box.
When initially asked about the morality of lying, it is easy for one to condemn it for being wrong or even corrupt. However, those asked are generally guilty of the crime on a daily basis. Lying is, unfortunately, a normal aspect of everyday life. In the essay “The Ways We Lie,” author Stephanie Ericsson makes note of the most common types of lies along with their consequences. By ordering the categories from least to most severe, she expresses the idea that lies enshroud our daily lives to the extent that we can no longer between fact and fiction. To fully bring this argument into perspective, Ericsson utilizes metaphor, rhetorical questions, and allusion.
“Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one’s definition of your life, but define yourself.”– Harvey Fierstein
Hastings County, Social Housing, “Boxed In” April 2005 (pg. 6, 7, 15, 16, 23, 24, 108) Local Sources (pg. 110-114) Retrieved from: http://www.hastingscounty.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=115&Itemid=88
Psychological research and application have established that it is not only people with learning disability or major mental illness that are susceptible to make false confessions. In order for a confession to be false, a person must either confess to a crime that he or she is completely innocent of or overstate his or her involvement in the crime. False confessions can be either voluntary or coerced. Although it is methodologically difficult to establish the frequency of false confessions, anecdotal evidence such as self-reports and case studies indicate that reported cases are only the ‘tip of the iceberg’. It appears that young people are particularly vulnerable and often make false confessions in order to protect others. Standardized psychological tests have been devised in order to assess personality factors such as suggestibility and compliance that render some people more vulnerable than others. The reason people make false confessions is typically due to a combination of factors such as psychological vulnerabilities, nature of the custodial confinement and the police interviewing tactics. Notorious cases of false confessions which have lead to the wrongful convictions of innocent people subsequently spending years in prison represent some of the worst cases of miscarriage of justice in Britain. One such cases, that of Engin Raghip of the so-called ‘Tottenham three’ will be discussed in the context of admissibility of psychological evidence in order to demonstrate how the judiciary has increasingly come to accept the psychological notion that most people, under certain circumstances, are susceptible to making false confessions.
Macbeth uses deception and lies to become king from killing Duncan to killing his “friend” Banquo. Lady Macbeth is not much better. She also deceives Duncan when he comes to stay in their castle. She later tries self-deception to rid her of some of the heavy guilt she is feeling. The witches use deception with Macbeth, toying with his life. Their false prophecies eventually leave Macbeth unprepared and lead to his downfall. While many different strategies are used in this play by Shakespeare to get Macbeth the kingship, deceit is the most prominent and important in the entire play.
Trust is a two way street. Trusting people is somewhat second nature to some. Unfortunately, trust is very hard to come by these days with all of the deception and scams that people are using. A person may think that they could easily spot a scam or detect deception but it is not as easy as it seems. Deception and scams are important tools for illicit actors to use in order to gain the upper hand on whatever the situation may be.
Assisted Living Facilities abuse is a frequently occurring problem in our society (Hamilton). There are diverse categories of abuse that transpire in Assisted Living Facilities which are physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, abandonment, and financial abuse. Samples of physical abuse would be hitting or beating the elders with an object or their hand, force feeding them or pulling their hands. Sexual abuse is the Assisted Living Facility employees having sexual acts with non-consenting patients. Emotional abuse is the employees saying things verbally to torment the patient. Neglect would be the employee does not take care of the patients such as providing hygiene. Abandonment occurs when leaving patients to fend for themselves. Financial abuse is when the patient’s family pays for the services that were not taken care of. “Elder abuse is fast becoming one of the uppermost law enforcement tasks of the next century, “said Paul Hodge who investigates crime against the elderly (Gonzalez). Since abuse occurs throughout assisted living facilities, state and federal governments should establish a type of punishment such as sending for employees to prison, ways to prevent abusing elderly’s is by inspecting employees ' criminal records, qualified staff, reporting injuries, having surveillance of the areas that do not affect patients privacy, promoting continuous family visits, and shortage of staffing.
Deception is sometimes used by researchers when they conduct psychological experiments. Deception occurs when the participant is misled about the purpose, design, of the experiment, or when the researcher uses deliberate misleading to persuade the subject into believing a certain view (McLeod). Many people believe deception is ethically wrong, and psychologists should not use it to obtain important information. I believe psychologists should be able to use deception if the participant is not psychologically harmed. It is believed that deception is the only way we can obtain true information (Connolly). The knowledge we are able to obtain about psychological tendencies outweighs the temporary effects of deception.
Healthcare professions have codes of conduct and ethics that address the issue of honesty and trust in relation to patient encounters yet truth-telling (or being honest) versus deception (or being dishonest) has been identified as an ethical issue in hospitals, particularly about diagnosis and prognosis disclosures. Dossa (2010) defines being honest or telling the truth as relating the facts as one knows them. Furthermore, Dossa (2010) states that deception can be an act of dishonesty but also can be without lies. In other words, forms of deception include not giving any information, not giving information of the truth, withholding information, selecting what information to give and not give, and giving vague information.
Self Deception Self deception is the process or fact of misleading ourselves to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid. Self deception, in short, is a way we justify false beliefs to ourselves. There is no doubt that sometimes we are not realistic. Not all of our actions are rational or intentional.
Self incrimination is an act of which one is exposing themselves, usually by making a statement about a accusation. Self- incrimination can either occur indirectly or directly. Indirectly means when information of self incriminatory nature is disclosed from an individual voluntarily without any pressure from another person. Directly means that information that was obtained was due to interrogation of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed. Criminals that have been accused can not incriminate themselves. They have a choice in whether they would like to speak to a police officer or any other authorities. If they chose not to speak
The Lie, a dreaded horrible thing we tell to avoid the truth. Lies come in all shapes and sizes. Some lies are small to the point they are just omitting certain parts of the truth. Other lies are the secret lies, these lies can cause damage to trust between you and the person you tell it to. The worst of all the lies are the funniest kind of lies you look back on, they are the one you tell even though you been caught. With every word the punishment just gets worse, to the point of no return. Lies are the worst option to take in any scenario no matter how devastating the truth can be.
Pressure can force people into doing deranged actions. When innocent people plead guilty or make incriminating statements the main reason is because they feel guilty or know more inside information. There have been many cases in which an innocent person was secretly blackmailed or forced into pleading guilty. The mental state of a confessor is also vital in knowing the truth. Confessions from juveniles is usually unreliable because most of the time they don’t understand the situation completely and they can also be manipulated easier than an adult could. Mentally capable adults confess when they’re innocent for a variety of reasons, exhaustion from excessive interrogation,a belief that they could be released if they confessed,or that they truly do feel guilty. Pressured confessions are less common, but there have been cases. False confessions are a hazard in trial cases and can also give an innocent person a cruel sentence.