Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious views on abortion
Religion vs. secularism
Religious views on abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious views on abortion
Religion and politics are considered to be taboo topics in our present age. The debate is usually, should religion and politics mix? Or are they like oil and water? Two entities that cannot mix no matter how much one shakes them. Indeed, the two topics, religion and politics are very sensitive. Brendan Sweetman bridges this gap by stating that “politics needs religion if it is to be truly democratic, concerned with fairness among worldviews, equality and a vigorous public discussion” (p. 12). He insists that, all worldviews have a genuine place in the democratic process, and that non-religious positions promote their own worldviews, just as the various religions do. Indeed, he demonstrates that even “secular humanism is a worldview” and a …show more content…
52). Sweetman contends that “secularism is an influential and serious worldview in the modern world and it plays a significant role in the debate in the public square” (p. 17). He likens secularism to religion in chapters one, three and four although he states that, the difference between traditional religions and secularism is the obvious negation of the spiritual realm and a God (p. 79). Advancing the argument that secularism and Christianity should be treated in the same manner that is, both should have similar access to the public sphere. He unpacks the argument in chapter four by addressing contentious debates such as euthanasia (p. 85) and abortion (p. 86) which he argues should not be left to secularists for their main agenda is “Seculocracy-which is a point where the laws are based on secularist ideologies” (p. 65) and also shows how in a multicultural and democratic society, those with religious convictions can just as properly, and reasonably, put forth their case as the secularists. Abortion is a perfect example how secularists have imposed their “religious” beliefs upon the rest of the society which can be viewed as a form of secular tyranny. He adds that secularism is life regulating due to the belief that “everyone has the right to live as they deem fit just as long as they do not harm another person” (p.
Despite law having evolved to what it is today, religion is still embedded within modern democratic government systems used today. In 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt recognized the place that religion holds in democracy. “Religion, by teaching man his relationship to God, gives the individual a sense of his own dignity and teaches him to respect himself by respecting his neighbor. Democracy, the practice of self-government, is a covenant among free men to respect the rights and liberties of their fellows. International good faith, a sister of democracy, springs from the will of civilized nations of men to respect the rights and liberties of other nations of men.
The pro-life stance on abortion is often associated with and defended by traditional Christian beliefs , ; however, this paper will argue that it can and should be defended with secular arguments that appeal to reason and our shared human condition. This paper will try and counter the notion that the argument is simply another battlefield where religion and secular thought meet. Rather, it is an important issue that carries with it heavy implications not only for the religious but also for the secular. The major arguments discussed include the emotional and physical toll on the mother, the societal toll of having abortion legalized, and the rights attributed to every human being; first, however, the stance taken in this paper will be further defined and clarified.
Religion has ingrained itself into mainstream American politics. The current Reform Party and many portions of the Republican party platforms evidence this.
Wood, James E, Jr. "Religious Human Rights and a Democratic State." Journal of Church and State 4(2004):739. eLibrary. Web. 31 Aug. 2011.
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
... middle of paper ... ... But as long as the Church and State have anything to do with one another, the struggle will continue. Bibliography:..
Sikhism interdicts late-term abortion because it states that people shall not interfere in the creative work of God.... ... middle of paper ... ... Works Cited Neerhof, Sprang.
...e, vague topics. The disunity made the Church too unstable to continue possessing political power and so the State became the head of politics, and now we have separation of Church and State, which is renders this time “a secular Western culture” (Powell 6).
People always tell you that there are two subjects never to bring up at a dinner party, one is religion and the other is politics. Why is that? It is because both subjects invoke very strong emotions. Rather than saying something inappropriate, most people avoid talking about religion altogether. But get those same people in a room and ask their political opinions, that is a different story. For many reasons, people are vocal about their political beliefs (Bentz, 2013). Unfortunately, individuals will judge people by their political beliefs first, without notice to other important aspects of their lives. And that is the reason that politics is not brought up in dinner parties.
Since the Darwinian Revolution of the 19th century our society has turned upside down. Everything under the sun had become questionable, the origin of life, how we came to be, where are we headed and what to do in the here all became questions in life. But one of the greatest impacts of this new age thinking is its effect on our Old World values. Western societies values, morals and ethics became debatable, with some people striving for change and others clinging for stability. Battle lines had been drawn and the Liberals and Conservatives were ready to duke it out on a number of issues. One of these debates centers on a woman?s right to have and abortion. According to the Webster?s dictionary and abortion is defined as a miscarry, something misshapen or unnatural. An abortion is a procedure in which an embryo or fetus is prohibited from developing by artificial means. One could argue that this is next to murder. How can we as a society sanction the murdering of developing babies? Also it can equally be stated that abortion is unnatural and a health hazard to women who have undergone the procedure. Whatever the case, abortion should be outlawed because it is immoral and mothers should face the responsibilities of their actions. Many arguments can be used in order to put an end to abortion or at least in order to establish dialogue. One of the oldest arguments against abortion is the religious standpoint. Western society (Canada & U.S.A.) is historically a Judeo-Christian culture with Judeo-Christian values. Although in recent times we have become an increasingly pluristic society the Old World thinking is still at the heart of our social relations and laws. The Bible says ?Thou shalt not kill? thus prohibiting people from harming others or themselves. Abortion and its advocates violate this law. They seek to change one of the most fundamental values of our society. Pro-choice under this stance is equated with murder and ?playing God?. One may raise the question, how can a minority inflict its views of the majority? According to Francis X. Meenan, this is a false assumption. He goes on to claim that those who favor abortion on demand are the real minority (Bender & Leone, 97). He also claims that the issue of abortion is a moral debate and cannot be settled by numbers. So even if pro-choice advocates outnumbered pro-life advocates, this would prove or...
In his article “Why the Secular Needs the Sacred,” William Kirk Kilpatrick writes a legitimate repudiation of a fallacy that conjectures that secular legal authority is a propitious substitution for religious principle. He initially propounds that insufficient morality is the result of apathy, toward religion, as opposed to an aversion. He proceeds to show that human law is ineffective unless buttressed by Devine counsel: some form of truth must be accepted as a postulate. Kilpatrick subsequently shows that without a solid moral basis, authority structures begin to deteriorate. He concludes by showing that secularism is better understood as a false religion.
The role of religion in politics is a topic that has long been argued, and has contributed to the start of wars, schisms (both political and religious), and other forms of inter and intra-state conflict. This topic, as a result of its checkered past, has become quite controversial, with many different viewpoints. One argument, put forth by many people throughout history, is that religion and the government should remain separate to avoid any conflicting interests. This view also typically suggests that there is one, or several, large and organized religions like the Roman Catholic Church, which would be able to use their “divine” authority to sway the politics of a given state by promising or threatening some form of godly approval or disapproval. By leveraging their divine power, individual figures within a religion, as well as the religion as a whole, could gain secular power for themselves, or over others. A second view, which was developed by many theologians through history, suggests that that without religion there would be a general lack of morality in the people and leaders of a given state, which would give way to poor political decisions that would not be in the interest of the people and perhaps even God (or the gods). This argument, however, does not address the fact that morality can exist without religion. In sociology, it is commonly accepted that social norms, which include morality, can result from any number of things. Religion, laws, or the basic desire of survival can all create these norms, so it suffices to say that as a society, our morals reflect our desire to live in relative peace through the creation of laws that serve to help us to survive. The argument of whether or not religion and politics should mix...
Religion was the largest factor in political and economic life (Snodgrass, 118). Religion was brought into politics, like if a politician wanted something done, they could persuade others with threats of the gods (Snodgrass, 116). Many parties would claim that the gods were helping them with what they wanted to accomplish or that the gods were against their enemies, therefore the general public should be too for fear of the gods’
Religious Fundamentalism is not a modern phenomenon, although, it has received a rise in the late twentieth century. It occurs differently in different parts of the world but arises in societies that are deeply troubled or going through a crisis (Heywood, 2012, p. 282). The rise in Religious Fundamentalism can be linked to the secularization thesis, which implies that victory of reason over religion follows modernization. Also, the moral protest of faiths such as Islam and Christianity can be linked to the rise of Religious Fundamentalism, as they protest the influence of corruption and pretence that infiltrate their beliefs from the spread of secularization (Heywood, 2012, p. 283). Religious Fundamentalists have followed a traditional political thought process, yet, have embraced a militant style of activity which often can turn violent (Heywood, 2012, p. 291).
Secularised ethics can be defined as “The basic principles of right action, especially with reference to a particular person, profession etc.” Christian ethics however cannot be as simply defined. Ethical values of Christians cannot be reduced to a set of rules that can be easily followed and obeyed. A definition that gives an idea of Christian Ethics can be given in this form,