Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corruption. essay
Secrecy means Impropriety In today’s government and related services there are many loop holes and places to hide things from the people of the United States of America and all other countries. While nothing is perfect, nothing of this scale should be so subject to privacy. Hiding these things leads to disasters and mistrust of the system that is meant to be for the people, a system to not fail the body it governs. Over the years things such as the cover up of the John F. Kennedy assassination, the justification of the Iraq war, the hidden 28 pages of the 9/11 report, secret financing of Nazi Germany, and secret banking records have caused suspicion within America and other countries about what exactly the government hides that have yet …show more content…
All over the world there are corrupt governments. Looking back into other secret records, there was hidden funding of Nazi Germany. Gold was being sold and smuggled to help them fund their operations by places such as Sweden. Sweden was supposed to remain a neutral country through out the war but it was later found out that that was not true. Over the years “Sweden conducted extensive trade with the Nazis, primarily in iron ore and ball bearings that were critical parts of Germany's war effort.” (Nazi gold went to Sweden 1). This neutral country kept those records a secret for many years. Even an American based bank help to fund the war efforts, of a country the United States was at war against. Chase Manhattan helped Nazi Germany excel at war efforts because “the bank offered to block both American and Jewish bank accounts, after talks with Chase Manhattan Corp” (Chase funneled Funds to Nazis). They were blocking the assets people of this country needed in order to promote the genocide in the opposing country. This knowledge was obviously not released to the public at the time it was happening since this is basically an act of treason. These two examples show that secrets do not only hide directly within the government but also in its counter parts. The way these bodies of people handle some of the information they receive is in no way helping those who deserve to know it. Secrecy has always been a trend in many …show more content…
The people of the United States should be able to hold their government accountable for keeping them informed about terrorist attacks, assassination, funding of wars, and basically any other crisis or national event that should arise. The people of the United States have just as much of a right to the information as government officials if it does not put national security at risk. The people need to trust the government in order to keep the country running smoothly. In the press conference requesting the release of the 28 pages from the 9/11 reports, the daughter of a man murdered by the terrorists said “9/11 children are growing up in a world where we can't trust our own government, because too many truths remain hidden about who was ultimately responsible for the murder of our parents” (9/11 cover up). This is proof that the government isn’t being held accountable for things like
When it comes to personal information in America, the genie is out of the bottle. As such, information security will continue to be a pressing concern especially to most of our top three-letter-agencies such as the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), NSA (National Security Agency), DOD (Department of Defense), and HS (Homeland Security) as most of them are staffed with employees with top secret security clearances (also known as TS).When someone is given this clearance, not only are they slated to uphold an allegiance to core values but they are also entrusted with our nations’ sensitive secrets and are held to the highest standards. Many of these professionals are honest and loyal to their country, but all humans are susceptible to preservation, desires, and needs that the famous psychologist Maslow showed in his famous hierarchy of needs pyramid. As such, without undue temptation and trickery most handle their jobs well and uphold their commitments to quietly (sometimes loudly) dedicate their lives to patriotism.
McCraw, David, and Stephen Gikow. “The End to a Unspoken Bargain? National Security and Leaks in a Post-Pentagon Papers World.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 48.2 (2013): 473-509. Academic OneFile. Web. 5 Dec. 2013.
Following the devastating terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, the Unites States found itself in a search for answers and revenge against those that had brought about this atrocity. The attack that has been compared to that of Pearl-Harbor elevated the tracking and collecting of terrorism from barely a priority, to the forefront of the American radar. I honestly believe that terrorism as the #1 priority is destined to remain at the top for the foreseeable future. The elemental thoughts on almost all American minds following the attacks were who had the strength and capability to could carry out such an attack on a country with the world’s strongest military and what led to their focus to attack the Untied States: In short, who attacked us, and why do they hate us? The Untied States formed a bi-partisan 9/11 Commission was formed to trace the roots of Al-Qa’ida, investigate the history of the 19 hijackers, examine missed opportunities of law enforcement officials to avert the disaster, and make recommendations to clean up the faulty incoherent intelligence-gathering operation. The 500+ page 9/11 Commission Report contained thirteen chapters of historical narratives, analysis and recommendations. All ten members of the bi-partisan commission signed off on the report, which has arguably become a national historical document. Just as the 9/11 Commission was created to find answers and recommend necessary follow steps to ensure history doesn’t repeat itself, Lawrence Wright sought answers as to why 3000 American lives were lost in the attacks on September 11th. An experienced traveler to the region, Lawrence Wright endeavored to do his own investigative study into the history, ideology and circumstances behind this large-...
The Watergate Scandal and the resignation of President Nixon was the beginning of American’s mistrust of politicians. This can be viewed as a positive effect. As a result three important open record reforms created. The first of the reforms is the Sunshine Act in 1976. This requires government agencies to conduct meetings that are open to public, with a few exceptions. In 1978, the Ethics in Government Act requires public officials to disclose financial and employment records. The Presidential Records Act, also initiated in 1978, required preservati...
Similarly, it can not be proved that the top secret programs and policies have ever served their intended purpose – to protect the United States against international threats both foreign and domestic and against terrorist attacks. The government protects itself by claiming that because information was collected on everyone, no one person was discriminated against so they can not be charged for invasion of privacy.
When a giant explosion ripped through Alfred P. Murrah federal building April 19,1995, killing 168 and wounding hundreds, the United States of America jumped to a conclusion we would all learn to regret. The initial response to the devastation was all focused of middle-eastern terrorists. “The West is under attack,”(Posner 89), reported the USA Today. Every news and television station had the latest expert on the middle east telling the nation that we were victims of jihad, holy war. It only took a few quick days to realize that we were wrong and the problem, the terrorist, was strictly domestic. But it was too late. The damage had been done. Because America jumped to conclusions then, America was later blind to see the impending attack of 9/11. The responsibility, however, is not to be placed on the America people. The public couldn’t stand to hear any talk of terrorism, so in turn the White House irresponsibly took a similar attitude. They concentrated on high public opinion and issues that were relevant to Americans everyday. The government didn’t want to deal with another public blunder like the one in Oklahoma City. A former FBI analyst recalls, “when I went to headquarters (Washington, D.C.) later that year no one was interested in hearing anything about Arab money connections unless it had something to do with funding domestic groups. We stumbled so badly on pinpointing the Middle East right off the bat on the Murrah bombing. No one wanted to get caught like that again,”(Posner 90). The result saw changes in the counter terrorism efforts; under funding, under manning, poor cooperation between agencies, half-hearted and incompetent agency official appointees and the list goes on. All of these decisions, made at the hands of the faint-hearted, opened the doors wide open, and practically begged for a terrorist attack. So who’s fault is it? The public’s for being
...that had helped the United States to be one of the greatest counties that it is today. Within the agency, there was no communications where they kept information from each other. The CIA agency had no idea what they were doing in regards to central intelligence and they were compromised where the enemies knew about the attack before the attack was fully implemented. These examples prove that some leaders had some positive outcomes for the United States, but the agency from within could not stay united as well as keeping communications about what was going on in the world. I agree with Tim Weiner’s thesis that the United States is one of the greatest countries in the world, but we cannot seem to create a great and efficient spy service to benefit the United States.
Everyday citizens often live unaware of their government’s inner workings. The knowing of political espionage is often too heavy of a subject to be inducted in conversation. True, prima facie, modest twists and turns of information may not be considered substantial, but this inconsideration leaves much to be uncontrolled. It is easy for political leaders to become power crazed, to not realize the massive implications that come of their actions. Only after all is said and done do the people actually realize their government is an opaque mask of deception. The Watergate Scandal substantially impacted Americans’ trust in their government.
In conclusion, the government was not part of the 9/11 attacks because, terrorists admitted to it, nobody has found evidence against the government, and 3,000 people were killed, the government would not do any of those things. Something you could do about this issue is telling people who believe that the U.S government did this, that they are
Similarly some information are kept from being publicized to the whole world by the government. Wikileaks has done otherwise: material that they disclosed to the world was sensitive material that belonged to the g...
In our government we have an agency that protects not only us but sensitive information that could jeopardize the future of our nation. In the movie Captain America: The Winter Soldier, they had a similar agency. That agency was Shield. Just like the National Security Agency like we have, Shield had eyes and ears everywhere. Nobody is perfect though. Just because they are the National Security agency, doesn’t mean they know about all the threats out there. In Captain America, members of Hydra tried to end Nick Fury’s (the director of shield) life. Attempts have been made to harm presidents in the past, even though something so important should be investigated and stopped, sometimes no body know to stop it. The information could have never
The attacks on American soil that solemn day of September 11, 2001, ignited a quarrel that the grade of singular privacy, need not be given away in the hunt of grander security. The security measures in place were planned to protect our democracy and its liberties yet, they are merely eroding the very existence with the start of a socialistic paradigm. Benjamin Franklin (1759), warned more than two centuries ago: “they that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Implementing security measures comes at a cost both economically and socially. Government bureaucrats can and will utilize information for personal political objectives. The Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of what the ‘law is”, causing a lack of circulated rule. The actual leaders with political purposes jeopardize our individual privacy rights, liberties, and freedoms.
The American government used to be able to keep the people in happy ignorance to the fact that they watch every move they make. After certain revelations of people like Edward Snowden, the public knows the extent of the government spying. On June 5, 2013 Edward Snowden leaked documents of the NSA to the Guardian (The Guardian 2). The whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed to the world how the American government collects information like cell phone metadata, Internet history, emails, location from phones, and more. President Obama labeled the man a traitor because he showed the world the illegal acts the NSA performs on US citizens (Service of Snowden 1). The government breached the people’s security, and now the people are afraid because everyone is aware of how the US disapproves of people who do not agree with their programs. Obama said that these programs find information about terrorists living in the US, but he has lit...
Yet the so called answers pose even more questions. Such as, just how much of our media outlook has been skewed to fit what government officials have in mind (“Media-Elite Conspiracy”). It is only until red flags start appearing in stories, that high ranking officials and media begin altering viewpoints and previous information. With that being said, it seems suspicious being that the U.S government has never officially confirmed or denied that major world and national events, primarily seen as acts of terrorism or backlash, were in fact done on purpose in order to carry out a specific task or need within society. From a government official’s viewpoint it seems probable to not want distrust from citizens. On the contrary, however, the public in both federal and state governments believed that the elite were interfering too much in both state and local issues, therefore hindering trust. Stemming from this belief comes conspiracy theories. The situation of paranoia worsens when the representatives of a social interest, such as opposing theories, are shut out of the political process: having no access to political bargaining and decision making (Drezner). While the government has yet to confirm any conspiracy to this day, there are still people that give up everything to prove what they rightfully believe as truth. In a society that solely believes the government does good, these people are not only brave for speaking out, but also have some definite points they want to get across to the world. Another thought about how so these so called theories may have some truth behind them is that events that raise conspiracy flags are too convent in timely terms. Whether the government needs a law passed, patriotism up, or a reason to go to war with other countries, there has been speculation that there is a direct
It is reasonable to argue that, governmental institutions or people with authority are subject to withhold a great deal of information from society. Many may argue that secrets are kept to ensure the safety of the nation. Thus, upholding the governmental duty of protecting the nation against possible threats. On the other hand, many believe that secrets may exist which violate our constitutional rights. Over the last year, Edward Snowden, has made headline news for leaking sensitive governmental information to the press. Edward Snowden is a 29-year-old high school drop-out, who was a tech specialist for the National Security Association. Snowden had discovered and later exposed the NSA for monitoring the nations e-mails, phone calls, and internet searches. As the allegations spread like wild fire, Edward Snowden sought asylum in Russia for one year. Snowden had a valid and justifiable reason to expose the NSA to the world because they were in violation of our fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable searches and seizures. The government called him a traitor, while others viewed him as a hero for exposing the government. Edward Snowden is a whistle blower because he felt that it is up to society to decide if governmental practices are just or unjust. Snowden does “express the highest respect for the law”, and he wanted to protect the right of privacy for American citizens.