Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The reformations effects
The second great awakening in own words
The second great awakening in own words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The reformations effects
The Second Great Awakening was significant because reform movements were connected with religion. Most of reform movements were in fact influenced by the religious ideas expressed during the Great Awakening. Religious congregations and sermons challenged the true faith of people, and as a result different religious groups emerged in order to purify the society. With the ongoing religious revivals, different group of people also began to question the governing norms, which contradicted with religious teachings. In David Walker’s, “African American Abolitionist David Walker Castigates the United States for Its Slave System, 1829,” Walker also raised the question of African slavery, and how it did not agree with Christianity. Walker said: Are we MEN! ! -- I ask you, 0 my brethren! are we MEN? Did our Creator make us to be slaves to dust and ashes like ourselves? Have we any other Master but Jesus Christ alone? Is he not their Master as well as ours? -- What right then, have we to obey and call any other Master, but Himself? How we could be so submissive to a gang of men, whom we cannot tell whether they are as good as ourselves or not, I never could conceive. Due to the incorrect application of religion, religious movements also had repercussions in political spheres. Many religious scholars believed that through changes in societal laws, they can bring peace and salvation. As a result, the reforms like abolitionist, women’s rights, and education begin to take shape. In short, Second Great Awakening gave rise to religious change, which encouraged people to bring change in creation and laws of society in order to achieve redemption. While the religious change brought liberty through dictatorship among some women, the notion o... ... middle of paper ... ...which belong to them as citizens of these United States. Some women also used religion to justify the rights of women and equality. In, “The Former Slave Sojourner Truth Link Women’s Rights to Antislavery, 1851,” Sojourner said: Then that little man in black there, he says women can't have as much rights as men, 'cause Christ wasn't a woman! Where did your Christ come from? Where did your Christ come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with Him. If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again! And now they is asking to do it, the men better let them. In short, reformers were fed up with inept government, and believed that through economic and social reforms, they can influence the government to enact the changes they desire.
Subjugation of women, in fact, is a symptom of man’s fallen nature. If the work of Christ involves the breaking of the entail [inherited consequences] of the fall, the implication of his work for the liberation of women is plain. Unwarranted assumptions have sometimes been drawn from the fact that all twelve of the original apostles were men. But in fact our Lord’s male disciples cut a sorry figure alongside his female disciples, especially in his last hours; and it was to women that he first entrusted the privilege of carrying the news of his resurrection. He treated women in a completely natural and unselfconscious way as real persons. He imparted his teaching to the eager ears and heart of Mary of Bethany, while to the Samaritan woman (of all people) he revealed the nature of true worship. His disciples who found him thus engaged at the well were surprised...
The Second Great Awakening was extremely influential in sparking the idea of reform in the minds of people across America. Most people in America just accepted things the way they were until this time. Reforms took place due to the increase of industrial growth, increasing immigration, and new ways of communication throughout the United States. Charles Grandison Finney was one of the main reasons the Second Great Awakening was such a great success. “Much of the impulse towards reform was rooted in the revivals of the broad religious movement that swept the Untied State after 1790” (Danzer, Klor de Alva, Krieger, Wilson, and Woloch 240). Revivals during the Second Great Awakening awakened the faith of people during the 1790s with emotional preaching from Charles Finney and many other influential preachers, which later helped influence the reforms of the mid-1800s throughout America.
Abolitionism was an issue between the North and South and had been debated in Congress long before the Second Great Awakening. The Second Great Awakening was like a wake up call that slavery was morally wrong and that something had to be done a soon as possible to correct it. The Awakening inspired northerners to take a stand on slavery and confront southerners about this problem. Before, Northerners really did not care about what was going on in the south, as long as they got their cotton to use in the textile mills and could work they were fine. They did not care about slavery because it...
In essence, the Great Awakening was a religious awakening. It started in the South. Tent camps were set up that revolve around high spirited meetings that would last for days. These camp meetings were highly emotional and multitudes of people were filled with the Spirit of God. These meeting, were sponsored mainly by Methodist, Baptist, and Presbyterians, and met social needs as well as spiritual needs on the frontier. Since it was hard for the Baptist and Methodist to sustain local churches, they solved the problem by recruiting the non educated to spread the word of God to their neighbors. The camp meetings eventually favored "protracted meetings" in local churches.
Reform movements including religion, temperance, abolition, and women's rights sought to expand democratic ideals in the years 1825 to 1850. However, certain movements, such as nativism and utopias, failed to show the American emphasis on a democratic society. The reform movements were spurred by the Second Great Awakening, which began in New England in the late 1790's, and would eventually spread throughout the country. The Second Great Awakening differed from the First in that people were now believed to be able to choose whether or not to believe in God, as opposed to previous ideals based on Calvinism and predestination.
In this paper i’m going to be covering the importance and what the Second Great Awakening was as well as commenting on the great revival. The second great awakening was a reprise of the great awakening that happened in the early eighteenth century. It was marked on a personal based level. It was beginning to get bigger in many places and in several different active forms. In northern New England, there was a social activism that took place, the movement encouraged a large growth of all the newer denominations. The Second Great Awakening was a time of mythical and revival. Which was all within the newly formed nation of America. The British
5.Gary Nash thinks the Great Awakening highlights the tension between the existing authority and the new radical thinkers of the eighteenth century. To those in power, the movement was detrimental to them. While the common people viewed the Great Awakening as a way to control their own salvation which increased their individualism. The lower class view the movement as a step back to the times where individuals acted for the community instead of for their own gain. Implications of the Great Awakening would be the distrust of established authority and the sense of individualism among the American
The antebellum period before the Civil War was one of rapid changes in American society. During this time, Americans began to feel a growing belief in human goodness and perfection, resulting in a new commitment to improve the character of people. Many reformers developed their enthusiasm for the cause from religion. The Second Great Awakening encouraged a lively evangelicalism to spread throughout the country, inspiring these modern idealists to work for a perfected social order that would be free from cruelty, war, alcoholism, discrimination, and slavery. American reform movements between 1820 and 1860 reflected pessimistic views of human nature, but also showed a hopeful outlook towards American society regarding education, woman’s rights, and penal institutions.
Slavery, society, and religion were key factors for democratic ideals in the time of the reform movements. Slavery was still common in the time of 1825-1850. Society was ruined due to drunks and not having a established prison. Religion wanted to make people better and make sinners good. Therefore it all lead to democratic ideals and to make more of a perfect society.
Sojourner Truth’s speech at the Women’s Convention in 1851 was powerful, truthful and personal. As a black woman she experienced both type of discriminations, a double jeopardy of race and gender. In a time where the focus was on black men rights, Sojourne raised her voice in favor of black women rights too. During her speech she used personal experiences to connect with the audience as both women and mothers. She also made biblical references and strategically used repetition and rhetorical questions like: “Ain’t I a woman” to make a point about gender equality. One of the passages of her speech that caught my attention was when she pointed out a man in the crowd who had previously said. It was a powerful counterargument that exposed the social
During the time period of 1825 until 1850, there were many reform movements that dealt with a variety of things. Some movements had to do with religion, and women rights, and these two are the ones that had the most affect on the expansion of democratic ideals in the United States.
The Second Great Awakening was the cause for many cultural, social, and governmental changes in the 19th century. It led to pushes for prohibiting alcohol and ending slavery, as well as created better public asylums for troubled persons, one of the greatest successes. Morals were instilled in many Americans who flocked back to religion which led to better observations about society, led to reforms, and improvements in the nation as a whole, up to the decade before the civil
Where did your Christ come from? Man had nothing to do with Him. If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again”. This shows how men in general are not all that wise, how they believe that because God was all powerful and a man than that is how they should be too. However, they are not even close to being in the same category as Christ so their reasoning for women having no rights is already out the door. What Truth is trying to say is Christ made the first women and due to the actions she took along with a man changed life for everyone else. So that shows how men and women together formed this earth so together they can change it back to how it should be. Which is both men and women being equal no matter race they
Many ideas of male superiority come from and began with the Bible. It can be noted that woman, in the second creation story in Genesis, is made from that which is man. It can also be noted that it is a woman who, in the Garden of Eden story in Genesis, initially commits the first act against God's wishes and therefore causes herself and her companion to be judged and punished. Throughout the Bible, women are rarely referred to by an actual proper name. Women are referred to as property, a mere woman in a world of men. Also in the Bible, women are presented to be focused entirely around the home and are property of men with the sole purpose of bearing children, as in the Abraham, Sarah, and Haggar cycle in Genesis in which the two women are property of Abraham, there only to provide him with an heir. However unfortunate, in the context and time it was written, this was the case. Still, today we cannot believe the Bible to be a guideline for the roles of women. Many ideas may be false concerning what has been inferred and what was actually written and its purpose. A closer reading of the text will prove that women played a vital role in many of the treasured beliefs of believers. Even without names, women had a voice and were a force to be reckoned with.
In Elizabeth Johnson’s She Who Is, the language used in the bible as well as other important figures in religious community to demonstrate the inherent inequality there is within the sexes. She speaks about how the assumption that God is male, despite the absence of God’s gender in Biblical texts in itself perpetuates an idea of patriarchy. She explains: “Yet the literal association of God with maleness perdures even in highly abstract discussions, as exemplified in the statement, "God is not male; He is Spirit."6 The assumption of divine maleness comes to light in the cognitive dissonance set up by marginalized speech” (Johnson, She Who Is). When one thinks of God, the greatest being, claiming that a woman cannot be reflected in that, that she is not capable to be viewed in that light might be the root of that invisibility Francis was discussing with Rabbi. The bible does not assign a gender to god, then the assignment of maleness implies that male is the only one capable. Francis views the role of a woman as different but of equal important-- to complement the man. To be a complement however, means one cannot exist without the thing to complement. While he clarifies that he does not view the woman as lesser than the man because of her duty--there is a paradox with that and with the idea that woman was made for the man. In a meeting with UISG about women as deacons in Early church he says: “The Church is woman ... she is a woman married to Jesus Christ, she has her Bridegroom, who is Jesus Christ... . And a woman's consecration makes her the very icon of the Church and icon of Our Lady. We men cannot do this.” (Pope Francis, UISG). Here he dismisses the idea of women in Catholic leadership by sugarcoating the