Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crusades effects brief summary
Crusades effects brief summary
Crusades effects brief summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crusades effects brief summary
Introduction
This report will be stating and investigating the cause and effects of the First and Second Crusade in Europe during the Middle Ages. The cause is a person or thing that gives rise to an action, condition or phenominan. The effect is the change with consequences of and action. It will link these two different events along with their significance in both short term and long term. The significance of an event is the importance or the quality of being worthy of attention. Pope Urban II and Louis VII are the two significant people that played a key role in these events. This report will state both their significance and role in society. The two events will be compared in order to find their interconnections between each other and
…show more content…
how these interconnections either benefitted them and us or disadvantaged them and us (the negatives). Causes of the First Crusade Short Term Causes The first crusade lasted for 3 years, starting in 1096- 1099. Muslim Turks invaded the holy land meaning Christians could not enter anymore into their home Jerusalem, the place where Jesus died, this is when they started to support the crusades. On November 27th 1096 Pope Urban II gave a speech upon his people (the Christians) from Western Europe (in Clermont, France) to join him in regaining their worthy land. This was a huge risk for the Pope to take as he risked the life’s of his own and was an extremely risky task as the Muslim Turks were Much more well developed in terms of Intellectual development, material development and their voyages of discovery (inventions and style of living). Long Term Causes The cause is a person or thing that gives rise to an action or phenomenon. The long-term cause of the first crusade is the feudalism between the Christians and the Muslim Turks. The Muslims Turks invaded Jerusalem in 1096 to reestablish the land belonging to the Christians (the holy land). Jerusalem had been under Christian control since 637CE and were threatened by the Muslim Turks which caused the first crusade which was one of the most extravagant events in the history of the medieval times. Both sides had the same task, to restore their land in which Jesus died which was heavily controlled by the two completely different religions. Effects of the first crusade Social Effects The crusades were a medieval Military expedition that started between a need and want of land lead by the Christians, meaning that there were many social effects. Between 2 and 6 million lives were lost, families were torn apart and homes were lost, Christians were tricked by Pope Urban II, people broke spirits and health, but these are just the negative social effects of the crusades. The Muslim and Christian worlds learned much from each other. For example, the Christians knowledge was expanded from the Muslims in terms of health, medicine, science, and mathematics. They also learned how to build ships and use magnet compasses. Many people take sides on this topic but it all depends on the perspective you look at. For the Christians the crusades were seen as a holy duty to defend the city of Christ’s birth. The Muslims also did this for their religion, but a different religion, which is why there was much feuding Economic Effects The first crusade increased the wealth of the Christians along with their power as well. It stimulated trade by increasing demand for product in the Middle East, which extended the production of goods and things to trade, which boosted the economy of the Christians and also developed their use of money. There was a lot of economic development during this crusade although mostly only benefitted the Christians, not the Muslim Turks. Political Effects The king’s authority was increased majorly in the success of the First Crusade which they again, learned from the Muslims about power and leadership. The kings increased taxes to fund the crusades and the resources required, when the people paying these taxes died, they took all of the profits and their land, he had money and land flooding through as political matters revolved heavily around the king and royalty. Religious Effects Every single crusade that ever occurred revolved and started because of religion and beliefs. A lot of the money made from this crusade was spent on prayers and benedictions at the churches and Monasteries. In the eyes of a Christian, the crusades were seen as a holy duty to defend the city of Christ’s birth. Pope Urban II called the crusade and promised them forgiveness for their sins, which was a part of their culture and religion. Significant Individual during the first crusade Pope Urban II (also known as Otho De Lagery ) was one of the most significant people in the forming and resolutions of the first crusade.
He was the one that called together to give a speech to all Christians about the invasion that was going to occur on Jerusalem, he left a huge mark in the history of the medieval times. ‘He died on the 29th July 1099 (the year that the first crusade finished), fourteen days after the capture of Jerusalem, but before the tidings of that event had reached Italy, Pope Paschal II killed him’. His role in this crusade was convincing the Christians to accompany him in taking over Jerusalem. His significance is based solely around the fact that he began the crusades and the establishment of land and economy within Europe (Western Europe) would not have been provided without him, let alone the positive effects of every other …show more content…
crusade. Causes of the second crusade Short term The second crusade lasted for 2 years from 1147- 1149.
Out of the eight crusades in total, this was the most unsuccessful crusade in all time, and why is this? Each king from both France and Germany travelled across France, Germany and Italy separately with both the same aim and desires. They urged people to restore the cross and to resurrect the Christians living in the Holy land. The Muslim Turks took over Edessa but in this process an entire population was either slaughtered or sold into slavery to work for the Turks. This all was caused due to a lack of communication between the kings Louis VII (France) and Conrad III (Germany) as they both lost their armies making them easily defeated and no threat to the Muslims.
The two kinds and their armies marched around Europe separately, both with the same intentions. This crusade the Christians were heavily defeated. The holy land was split into 4 different states which they had possession over, although, they lost one to the Muslim Turks. This crusade was different, it was a Catholic War against Islam. The main area that all the feuding was over was the city of Edessa, located just north of Jerusalem (at this point in ownership of the Christians).
Effects of the second
crusade Social Effects Several million lives were lost in the process of the second crusade, an unnecessary historical event. This crusade was one of the main events where slavery was a key part of their survival and using their power as their advantage. Jerusalem was extremely weakly protected after the second crusade commenced as the Christians were too focused on protecting themselves over their land, this is how the third crusade occurred. Although, this crusade was one hundred percent necessary for the Christians as they required more military reinforcements and the pope, and the remaining Christian rulers considered it necessary also. Economic Effects Such a humiliating defeat on the Christians and Western Europeans had such a negative effect in Europe which was evident in its economy, limited recruits and internal confusion. This crusade was extremely financial which as you could have imagined, made the Europeans furious to have spent and given their relatives land away for no return. Although, if you change the perspective, the Muslim Turks and the Islamic stated had gained a lot of money and power from these profits which boosted their economy tremendously. Political Effects The Second Crusade had a devastating effect on the politics of Europe, in fact, it was one of the first signs of deterioration of the crusader states within the Middle East and Europe. The French fought and abandoned the mission in 1149 whereas in 1147 the English and French helped the bishop and captured Lisbon (one of the 4 states). Then they reversed the position back to King Alphonso. The kings played a key role in the development during the crusades and over all time in politics and ruling with power, they still do.
Foss explains, “What Urban needed was an enterprise, clearly virtuous in serving the ends of Christiandome… in these moments of reflection, the popes mind turned towards Jerusalem.” Urban II reflects back on the first taking of the Holy City after the defeat of the Byzantine Empire in 1071, and begins to question what his people know about the Turkish race and really the ideology of Islamic thought. Foss goes on to examine the ignorance of westerners and needed to be “reminded [by the pope] of the infamous heathens, their cruelty and hatred of Christians,” hoping this would justify the first Holy Crusade. However, Foss identifies the creativity of the Pope’s language to persuade the knights and army of the people to embark on the Holy Crusade based on the Muslims cruel actions turned onto their fellow Christians. Claiming the Muslims “Killed captives by torture…poor captives were whipped…and others were bound to the post and used as a target for arrows.” Foss examines the Popes words as an effective effort of persuasion in creating an army of crusaders to help clean “…Holy places, which are now treated with ignominy and polluted with Filthiness” and any sacrifice in Jerusalem is a “promise of a spiritual reward… and death for
To solidify his thesis, the author explains how life was like during these times, how major events developed and how important roles took their place in history during the medieval age.
Now, in 1198, in order to raise the papacy rather than take the Holy Land, Pope Innocent III, called for another crusade. This crusade is mostly being led by French Knights and instead attempting to capture Jerusalem, they end up sacking the Christian city of Constantinople! After the fourth Crusade, the other crusades were disorganized efforts that accomplished little to
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
The First Crusade is often cited as one of the most damnable consequences of religious fanaticism. A careful inspection of the circumstances and outcomes, however, will reveal a resultant political restructuring of Europe under the banner of Christendom. The purpose of this investigation is to investigate Pope Urban II’s motives in initiating the First Crusade, with a particular focus on the consolidation of the Western Church’s influence in Europe. Among the primary sources that will be consulted are the letter sent by Patriach Alexios of Constantinople to Urban, and an account of Urban’s speech at Clermont. Relevant excerpts from both of these primary sources, as well as contextual evidence and a wide array of historiography, will be taken
In 1095 Pope urban II call all Christians to take part in what would become the world’s greatest Holy War in all of history. Urban’s called Christians to take up arms and help fight to take the Holy Land of Jerusalem back from the accursed Muslims. During this time of war the whole world changed. Land boundaries shifted, men gained and lost and gained power again, and bonds were forged and broken. The Crusades had a great impact on the world that will last forever. There were many major social, political, religious and economic changes that occurred during the crusades. But first, a brief history to give backbone to these reasons.
Pope Urban II naturally had a religious control over his people and when he gave his speech at the Council of Clermont in November 1905, he constantly referred to it as the will of God. His speech reminded them that the Crusades were their “concerns as well as God’s” . Throughout his speech, the Pope is constantly trying to align the need for men to fight with t...
Among some of the largest conflicts in the world stand the Crusades; a brutal conflict that lasted over 200 years and was debatably one of the largest armed religious conflicts in the history of humankind. Since this is so clearly an event of importance, historians have searched vigorously for the true answer as to why the crusades began. Ultimately, because of accusatory views on both the sides of the Christians and of the Muslims, the two groups grew in such hatred of each other that they began to act in deep discrimination of each other. Moreover, Christian motives seemed to be driven mostly by the capture of Jerusalem, the dark ages of Europe and the common-folks desperation for land, wealth, and a spot in heaven. What seems to be continually
Obviously the largest problem that came out of the war was the many deaths that were sacrificed for the wrong reasons. Since the crusades had finished because they finally realized it was a lost cause, some may say that those people died for no reason. Other instances where the crusades were bad were the now broken relationship between Jews and Christians and the bitterness between Christians and Muslims. On the first crusade, Christians went through Jewish communities on their way to Jerusalem. Forcefully baptizing them and killing them if they did not convert was not the best way to make the Jews care for the Christians. Christians after the crusades saw them as sacred religious movements, while the Muslims thought of them as the christians trying to expand their territory and rule as much land as they possibly
The Crusades were a bloody time period. They were a military campaign by the pope and the Roman Catholic Church to take back Jerusalem from the Muslims. They lasted from the 11th- 13th century. They were catastrophic and left Europe in ruins. Although the Crusades were such a violent period of time, they had a positive impact in history because of their role in the renaissance and exposing the Western world to the Eastern.
The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.
Just as the Second Crusade began with two different figures, the mission continued to grow into an increasingly disjointed and divided project. ...
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...
Latham, Andrew A. "Theorizing the Crusades: Identity, Institutions, and Religious War in Medieval Latin Christendom." International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 1 (March 2011): 234. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed March 14, 2012).
The Crusades were great military missions embarked on by the Christian nations of Europe for the purpose of rescuing the Jerusalem and the Holy Land from the hands of the Moslems. The Crusades were considered Holy Wars (1). Their main target was the Moslems not the Jews, although campaigns were also waged against pagan Slavs, Jews, Russian and Greek orthodox Christians, Mongols, Cathars, Hussites, Waldensians Old Prussians, and political enemies of the popes (2). There were many Crusades some more significant than others, but in general the Crusades was an important event in the history of Medieval Europe.