Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prophecy throughout the old and new testament
Prophecy throughout the old and new testament
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prophecy throughout the old and new testament
Truth can be defined as “the conformity to reality or actuality” (“Truth”). When taken literally, this definition can only be applied to merely factual statements such as: “the earth is round” or “one plus one equals two.” Another such example of the literal definition of truth can be seen in the philosophical rational truths that are applicable to all pieces of factual information or certain empirical, matter of fact truths. Thus, the truth of the Bible is often sought for in history, so that the Bible can be tied to reality and made into an actuality. However, such thought patterns are likely travel down a twisting road leading to one conclusion:the Bible is not true. Although,by searching for the truth of the Bible in the past leads to …show more content…
According to this article, it is wrongful to search for the truth in the Bible both in the past and in the future. Searching for the truth of the Bible in the past is flawed thinking because then one is basing the truth of the Bible in history, rather than in the message and intent for which the Bible was written. By finding historical accuracy in the Bible, the true meaning of the Gospels is compromised. The past is also harmful to the truth of the Bible because if the Bible gets history wrong, than the Bible is no longer true. The very beginning of the Bible is somewhat inaccurate because it is scientifically known that the earth took much longer than “seven days” to create, and while the Bible may have been using an understandable or symbolic time frame, it is thus historically and scientifically inaccurate and could be considered untrue. However, this is not the case and thus the truth of the Bible cannot be searched for in the past. On the opposite extreme, people will try to justify the truth of the Bible in the future. The claim is that the Bible is a prophecy for things to come, and that while it may not be true in current reality, it shall one day become actuality. However, this mentality is also massively flawed and cannot accurately depict the truth of the Bible. The reason that this mentality is considered flawed is due to the fact that very little of the Bible is prophetic at all. Furthermore, using the Bible as a prophecy is complicated due to the fact that prophecies are bendable and general and can be applied to a variety of scenarios, causing such ideas to lose accuracy. Finally, this is a flawed mentality because prophecies, especially the few existing ones in the Bible, have no definitive end. Thus, it is a continuous, never ending, always moving endeavour
The Bible is read and interpreted by many people all over the world. Regardless, no one knows the absolute truth behind scripture. Walter Brueggemann, professor of Old Testament, wrote “Biblical Authority” to help people understand what he describes as six different parts that make up the foundation to ones understanding of scripture. He defines these six features as being: inherency, interpretation, imagination, ideology, inspiration, and importance. As Brueggemann explains each individual part, it is easy to see that they are all interconnected because no one can practice one facet without involuntarily practicing at least one other part.
William C. Plachers’ article, “Is the Bible True?” explores deeper into the subject of the Bible and if it content it contains is credible information. Through Plachers’ statement, “We need to understand the genre to understand a text. Reading a text literally is not always reading it faithfully,” we are able to reach the idea that the Bible is in fact true, but it all depends on how the individual interprets the text.
William C. Placher in his article, “Is the Bible true?”, attempts to explain to the reader the reasons why we can believe in the Bible. Placher states that to understand how the Bible is true we need to first accept its genres, recognize its attitudes toward historical details, and consider the social context of the language in which it was written. When a person understands the meaning of the Bible they then can trust the Bible as a guide to life, and a way of understanding the world. After reading the article, multiple times, I have come to the conclusion that I do not believe Placher proved his thesis with the points he presented.
Writings of historical scholars, Josephus, Aristotle, and Plato, to name a few, are taken as truth and fact, yet the writings of the Scripture are constantly disputed. Why? Perhaps because of the ethical imperatives imposed to which people do not want to adhere. Perhaps because of man’s ego and pride that disallows them to submit to a Higher Authority. Nonetheless, The Bible has been, and still remains, the most widely read and revered book of all
Scientific truth is also shown in myths. When the Bible says the world was created in seven days, we are able to read through the scientific “error” and find the religious truth the writer was trying to get across. There was no need for God to reveal a more accurate understanding of science to his people. Limitation of Literalists Writers of myths never intended that their stories are to be taken as historical literal truth, stories that tell of historic events. Where many Christians would look at this story and see the meaning behind it, literalists would see this story as true.
Even though humans wrote the text, translating it and passing it down from generations to generations, God’s truth is unchanging. Debates of the inerrancy of the bible cannot usurp God as the King of grace. Instead of focusing on the inerrancy of the Bible, individuals who wish to seek a life of faith should focus on the inspiration God is showing them in his word. These revelations should move them into applicable, daily life changing implications from what they have learned. God shows revelations of himself through the Bible, and his character is revealed time and time again throughout scripture. Any faulty facts or discrepancies in grammar or data, should not take away from the value that scripture holds. When we read scripture we bring new meaning of interpretations of the truths God shows us, since new eras and environmental factors will be influential on how we process information. The bible is not just a fact book, telling humans stories of the past, but instead the bible is inspired instructions for how we can deal with spiritual and ethical encounters we
The Hebrew Bible, better known as the Old Testament, is a collection of tomes that form part of the Biblical canon. Many scholars around the world do not think that a single author wrote the books contained in the Hebrew Bible, but rather that it represents centuries of stories frequently compiled after the events they describe . The stories were created with visions for the future, in order to allow audiences insight into communities and beliefs that were common thought during their era. The stories responded to the issues and problems of their time, but also addressed contemporary climates. While the stories themselves may not be true, they convey truth without needing literal readings. For example, the creation stories in Genesis, portray God as creating the universe, and while this is considered as not ‘literally true’; the stories communicate theological truths about mankind’s relationship with God through the eyes of Hebrew writers .
Seemingly, there are folks who read the Bible for no purpose other than to search for flaws. Of course, there are no mistakes in God’s Word; nonetheless, there are those who have attempted to discredit the Bible’s message and they have used these verses, concerning the number of days, to support of their claim of a discrepancy.
To begin, before a person can debate the validity of anything, they must first understand the topic they are debating. So is the case here. A person must first understand the Bible and its origins before they can try and prove or disprove it. The Bible itself is composed of 66 books divided int...
The Hebrew Scriptures Truth, scripture, and revelation are three concepts that the Bible is based on. Truth is defined as the way that things are or should be. It can relate to reality or wisdom. Truth can be communicated in a variety of ways. Literally, which is facts and figures and can be shown in math and science.
The contents of the Bible have dealt with controversy in regards to its inerrancy since publication, and will surely continue to. Historians progress to learn more about biblical stories in order to provide evidence for the reliability of information. Many believers today understand that not everything in the Bible has been factually proven. An outstanding topic many scholars pay attention to lies within the four gospels. The three synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, replay essentially the same story with minor inconsistencies, while John portrays Jesus in an entirely different way. The differences in each gospel are due to how each gospel entertains different portrayals of the life and understanding of Jesus himself, in order to persuade
Scholars have shifted from the notion that the Bible differs from other ancient Near Eastern literature, cultures, and religions. If this were so, the Bible would be considered a myth. In this chapter Oswalt gives descriptions to what a myth is and gives insight into whether it is acceptable to label the Bible as a myth. Since the 1960s, scholars have been stating that the attributes of the Bible and its contemporary belief system have more in common to a myth even though the data used to make these claims have remained the same.
...hey continue to explain that the prophecies do not need to be fulfilled in a specific way. For example, they explain the first four trumpet judgments in Revelation do not have to have a literal fulfillment. This is improper because it is the author’s opinion and that should not be reflected especially on a book dealing with hermeneutics. Aside from these weaknesses, the book has much to offer for the Bible student.
Spanning fifteen hundred years with over 30,700 manuscripts, extensive archaeological evidence and 2000 prophecies that have been fulfilled, the Bible is God 's word to us. (Yohn, 2013). In the Bible, the Father is essentially giving us a picture of the history of the world and is also leading us to a place where we must make a decision that involves whether we choose to accept his son or reject him and remain guilty. Additionally, the Word of God tells us what happened that caused this breach between us and God, the result of this and how God has rectified it through the blood of his son. In fact, from the beginning of the Bible (written 1400 B.C.) to the last book (A.D. 96), God is showing us why we need Jesus and how to find him. Just as a plant’s root system propagates and occupies the pot that encloses it, Jesus permeates the entire Bible. Therefore, the motif of the Bible is the story of the redemption of mankind and it all points to Jesus as the messiah and savior who secures this for all.
The historical reliability of the Bible is the first matter that needs to be discussed. There are three criteria that the military historian C. Sanders lists as principles for documentary historical proof: the bibliographical test, internal evidence test, and the external evidence test (McDowell 43). The bibliographical test is the examination of text from the documents that have reached us. The reliability of the copies of the New Testament is tested by the number of manuscripts (MSS) and the time intervals between the time in which the piece of literature was written and our earliest copy. There are more than 5,300 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and 10,000 Latin vulgate manuscripts, not to mention the other various translations.