Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal justice system in scotland uk essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criminal justice system in scotland uk essay
In Scotland, criminal justice is a devolved power from the parliament of the United Kingdom
to the Scottish parliament. Because of this Scotland has its own, both, civil and criminal
justice system of trial, which differs from the English and welsh systems. These divisions are
the two main categories that Scots law is split into. Despite both justice systems belonging to
Scotland, they have many differences in the way they operate, alongside these differences
there are also many similarities that should be noted.
A criminal offence is an offence committed by an individual/group that violates a law, and
most commonly is against the state or causes harm to a member of the public. If an
individual is caught committing a criminal
…show more content…
For more serious
crimes, however, the prosecutor Fiscal may visit the crime scene and have a more active
involvement in the investigation. If it is decided that a prosecution is needed, the case will be
taken forward to court for trial.
When concerning the civil justice system of trial, most trials are cases in which a party are
seeking to find an impartial solution over a dispute that has taken place. The civil justice
system is focused around said party having the ability to sue another for their negligence,
carelessness or their failure to provide safety. In short, the civil justice system allows one
party to sue another for money and receive care for their injuries. If an individual decides
that they want to take the dispute to court and sue the other, they need to present themselves
and evidence before a judge. If the judge decides that the party is responsible for the incident,
they must pay money to the other.
When examining both systems of justice, there are many similarities and differences in
…show more content…
Thus, while both systems are in place to help ensure justice, they deal with
different types of cases.
Another difference the systems have is who initiates the legal process. The process of
criminal justice is most often started by the police force when they obtain a criminal. This
then starts the legal process; the individual is charged and it is decided by the prosecutor
fiscal if they will be prosecuted. Contrastingly, the civil legal system is initiated by the
individual/company who wants the case to go to court. They must firstly present the case to a
judge who will then make the final decisions on the conclusion of the case. Additionally,
while in criminal trials it is the responsibility of the police force to find evidence to secure a
prosecution, in civil trials it is the responsibility of the individual taking the case to court.
Thus, showing some of the many differences between the Scottish criminal justice system of
trial and the civil justice system of trial.
Despite these differences, the two systems also share many similarities. For example, both
systems result in court and they are presented before a judge. Both systems result in
Gradually, however, justice was established by scientific law. The private, scientific law courts had no government force at their disposal. The Sheriff served the due process of the law. He was not a law-enforcer. The scientific law courts were private courts that were supported by the fees charged to litigants.
They weigh the evidence and apply the law. In the court system, criminal law is interpreted by a jury who are seen as expressing the sense of justice of ordinary men and women. Juries date back to the Middle Ages in England, and while membership, role, and importance have changed throughout the ages, they were part of the system of England’s Common Law. The purpose of the jury system was to ensure the civil rights of the ordinary citizen. It is important to remember that at the time, ordinary people had few rights.
The developments in penal reform and policies in Scotland have grown with the creation of modern Scotland. Devolution fundamentally changed the nature of criminal justice in Scotland, and the research as shown that increased political involvement and the need for has changed the penal policies over the past few decades. Pre-devolution it was clear that policy-making was carried out in partnership between civil servants and agencies with a rate of change, but the introduction of devolution propelled policy-making into an unstable and heavily politicised environment, which was never the case before, where it now answers to political expediency and the political cycle and this forced the Scottish Criminal Justice Service to take shape become what it is today to deal with the new crime and punishment issues that were revolutionizing over time.
Crime is some action/omission that causes harm in a situation that the person/group responsible ‘ought’ to be held accountable and punished irrespective of what the law book of state say.
A criminal is obviously an individual who commits a crime, but what is crime? A crime is any act or omission of an act in violation of a public law. Though most laws are common throughout America, some laws are also established by local and state governments as well. Criminal laws and penalties vary from state to state. Crimes include both felonies and misdemeanors. Felonies are serious crimes like murder or rape and are punishable by imprisonment for a year or more. The consequence for felonies such as murder and treason can be the death penalty. Misdemeanors are less serious crimes like petty theft or speeding and are punishable by less than a year in prison. Fines are also punishments of both misdemeanors and felonies. The fine’s amount is determined by the seriousness of the case. However, no act is a crime unless it has been stated as such by an American law or statute.
The symbol of the Canadian judicial system is the balanced scales of justice. When a wrongful act is committed, the scales of justice are greatly misplaced and require a solution to counterbalance the crime and restore balance. Additionally, the scales represent the idea that law should be viewed objectively and the determination of innocence should be made without bias. The Canadian criminal justice system encapsulates the idea of the scale of justice, to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate the law. One of the most important aspects of this system is that an individual charged with a criminal offence is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The current system has two prevailing methods involved in the process of dealing with crime: Retributive and restorative justice. This paper will analyze aspects of retributive justice and restorative justice, with reference to their respective philosophies, for the purpose of finding which is more effective at achieving justice and maintaining balance.
One of the areas in which the two differ is the question of whom is the crime a violation of? The criminal justice system believes that crimes are a violation against the state and are punished by the state. On the other hand, the community justice system says that crimes are a violation of the offender, and the community directly affected by it. The focus of criminal justice is retribution. It is focused on the offender and punishing that person for their crime by imprisonment and other punishments. The community justice system is focused on restoration. Community Justice looks to help the victim deal with the violation and try to get back whatever, if any, possessions were lost in the crime.
The criminal justice system is made up of many components that are constructed to ensure justice for victims of crimes, along with criminals. It is designed to guarantee that punishing those who are guilty will protect the innocent. Within the criminal justice system, there is a document that consists of all the jurisdictions of criminal law. This document is called the criminal code and entitles the offences that are acknowledged in the jurisdiction along with consequences that are enforced for these crimes. Throughout the years, there are offences constantly being added to the Criminal Code of Canada and many proposals being made by the Law Reform Commission of Canada.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
There are many actors in the criminal justice system such as prosecutors, judges, and defense lawyers. They present their case to a jury who will eventually decide if the defendant is found guilty or innocence. During trial the prosecutor and defense lawyer both present their case. All of this can be a lengthy process which also takes up time and cost money. In many cases prosecutors will offer a defendant a plea deals.
The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many.
One way of looking at criminal law is that it is dealing with something of public awareness. For instance, the public has awareness. in seeing that people are protected from being robbed or assaulted. These are legal problems that fall into the criminal law. Criminal law involves punishing and rehabilitating offenders, and.
Both systems have also been advanced in its own historical setting. Above all the system makes sure that the innocent does not suffer in the name of justice, as the system
Every nation has their own set of legal strategies they use to guide them in making important decisions. Each nation has its traditions and policies they follow. Through the world, there are two main types of legal systems that are used; most nations follow either common or civil law. Both the common law system and the civil law system share similarities in having courts, judges, and comparing cases to laws. While both systems share similarities, they also contain many differences, making them two very divergent legal systems.