Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of technology on literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence of technology on literature
Science Fiction as a literary genre has historically fused the mythology of the past with the scientific advancements of the future, creating a world that is both comfortable and frightening. The love affair of the hybridity of myth and science is elegantly displayed in Nnedi Okorafor’s “The Book of the Phoenix” as a young woman struggles to reconcile her veiled past with the uncertain future created by her technologically enhanced birth. The elements of the story are purposefully selected to highlight the interconnectivity of technological advances and evolving cultures, as the protagonist struggles to discover her origins and destiny. Okorafor expertly utilizes science fiction as a genre, Africa as a setting, and Phoenix as a female character …show more content…
to lure the reader into a state of quasi-comfortability and cognitive estrangement. In “The Book of the Phoenix” Okorafor uses the elements of genre, setting, and character selection to create a world that embraces the mythology of her African heritage while also examining how revolutionary scientific advancements effect not only the future of all humanity but also the women who become the mothers of the future. Science fiction audiences are comfortable with the concepts of hybridity and transformation, as the genre often serves to normalize the fantasy and add plausibility to an otherwise impossible scenario.
Science fiction is also deliberately anachronistic in the sense that it asks its readers to accept the relation between the time they inhabit and the future, and by doing so opens the reader to a plethora of possibilities. Literary critic Carol Brown writes that science fiction is a perfect vehicle of describing “the interplay of science [namely, the ‘real’] and myth” (Brown,158). As a genre science fiction continues to express the transformation of socio-economic realities in the wake of rapid change. Science fiction, then, presents a vehicle for articulating the social conscience because it maps potential consequences and attempts to resolve them (Carstens, 83). “The Book of the Phoenix” examines the repercussions that genetically modified reproduction has on not only the offspring of such experiments, but also the mother who carries this experiment without knowledge of the long term effects. Science fiction can be read not merely as a critical commentary on biotechnoscience, but as a mode of thinking with science about the future of (human) life (Idema, 38). A continuing theme of the story is the struggle of Phoenix to discover her true origins and the difficulty of unraveling the truth when science has distorted it beyond recognition. The true purpose of science fiction …show more content…
is ultimately not about our quasi-scientific interest in the world, but rather about the lives and social relations set in a technoscientific future. It is because of this that Okorafor choses to not focus on the scientific aspects of Phoenix’s existence, but choses instead to develop a story that highlights her humanity and her struggle to find her place in the world. As a genre science fiction offers a platform from which to examine the conflict between the past, present and future as well as the clash between modernization and cultural identity. Situated within a historically marginalized literary genre, the readers of Science Fiction are secure with concepts of hybridity, transformation and non-linear time. These characteristics align science fiction with African orality and liberate its authors from the restrictions of centralized and critically recognized discursive practices. “Africa is rich in migratory mythology that ties in with contemporary cyborg narratives, drawing strongly on motifs of transformation, hybridity, gender-blending and extra-sensory perception. In addition, it abounds with mysterious mythology, redolent in warped time-frames and twisted metaphors that are essentially science-fictional (Carstens, 79)”. As modernity has sweeps through Africa, it has uprooted indigenous cultures and nations from their previously established lives. According to African theologian John Mbiti, despite embracing conversion to monotheistic religions, education and socioeconomic upheaval, African people have committed themselves to preserving deeply held traditional beliefs and practices. This clash of modernity and traditionalism creates inspirational states of cultural coexistence (1971: 3). Science fiction creates a way of expressing the African oral mythology while reworking the continent’s marginalized oral histories in the mythopoeic mode that characterizes, according to Quayson, indigenous oral narratives (1997: 121). Africa’s history has been marred by political strife, poverty, colonialization, industrialization and urbanization but its strong culture of rituals, myths and orality continue to remain vital across the African continent. Nnedi Okorafor pays homage to African culture in her novel by portraying technological possibilities for the future while also examining how technology interacts with a population who are raised with mythology. Okorafor depicts an easier acceptance of Phoenix Okore’s hybridity by Ghana natives who are accustomed to mysticism. Kofi Annan describes Phoenix as “Gods Creature” instead of as a monster, and that because she divinely created she is magically beautiful (Okorafor, 80). In her novel Okorafor highlights how the cultural norms of a society can greatly influence their acceptance of hybridity. These concepts beautifully align African orality and mysticism, allowing authors such as Okorafor to blend the future with the past in a way that can be universally palatable. Modern African primitivism, a contemporary subcultures of science fiction blends mythic and scientific themes in a way that allows the reader to appreciate both the cultural and scientific elements while providing an ideal canvas for Okorafor’s coming of age tale. The female body’s engagement with technology is a topic that offers limitless possibilities of rethinking concepts of the self. When choosing a character for her novel Okoroafor creates a post-human female character that has both genetically engineered fortitude and inherent humanistic emotionality and empathy. A post-human character allows for a construction of identity that is simultaneously fractured, multifaceted, and fluid without the constrictions of current gender stereotypes. “Post-humanism is particularly relevant to women and girls, whose bodies have generally functioned as a sign of their ‘otherness’ (Flanagan, 41).” By looking at how the human body can be technologically transformed either through biological interventions such as genetic engineering and cloning, cybernetic or surgical modifications, or simply by being interfaced with a machine such as a computer, post-humanism examines ways of understanding and conceptualizing the body (Flanagan, 41). Okorafor shows the relationship between technology and human subjectivity as hazardous, debilitating and prone to unethical or irresponsible outcomes. Phoenix struggles with the significance of her female body and the idea of self within a technologically advanced society. Her genetically experimental creation and early confinement limits her understanding of her own sexuality and reproductive abilities. Her involuntary combustion leads her to fear her own sexuality and hesitant to accept the physical affection of her male friend, Kofi (Okorafor, 81). Being an Accelerated Biological Organism (ABO) causes her to believe that at three years of age she is too old to produce a child. Her readiness to accept this unsubstantiated belief as truth may stem from her internal guilt at the death of her surrogate mother from cancer caused by radiation exposure while carrying Phoenix (Okorafor, 207). Phoenix mourns the loss of her surrogate mother and channels it into hatred for The Big Eye as an evil organization that preys on the African people. The tragedy of Phoenix’s mother prevents her from being able to consider becoming a mother herself. This internal struggle of Phoenix’s female character adds an additional dimension of humanity that could not be found otherwise. Phoenix comes to symbolize both the mother and reaper of humanity by scorching the earth to save it from the corruption of technology and release the proletariat masses from its bondage, while also establishing herself as a post-apocalyptic goddess (Okorafor, 221-232). The body and identity are not only radically transformed by everyday interactions with technology, but are projected into futures without histories.
(Toffoletti, 15). In “The Book of the Phoenix” Okorafor critiques the use of technology without a clear understanding of its effects on our humanity and culture. By using science fiction as the chosen genre Okorafor enables the reader to comfortably examine the effects of technology on human civilization by encouraging a feeling of cognitive estrangement: the feeling that a radically different fictional world is somehow akin to one’s own (Idema, 35). The use of Modern African Primitivism as a sub-genre allows the reader to see Phoenix thru the eyes of a culture permeated with mysticism, allowing us to examine the past and the future in a non-linear construct. Phoenix shows that even an Accelerated Biological Organism will seek its origins at the juncture of technology and culture, and that the internal struggle to find its roots will cause an inner turmoil that can prove deadly. Okorafor’s novel is a warning that unrestricted biotechnoscience research can lead to an uncertain future, and that our existence as a species may be threatened by the fruits of our
labor.
Literature and film have always held a strange relationship with the idea of technological progress. On one hand, with the advent of the printing press and the refinements of motion picture technology that are continuing to this day, both literature and film owe a great deal of their success to the technological advancements that bring them to widespread audiences. Yet certain films and works of literature have also never shied away from portraying the dangers that a lust for such progress can bring with it. The modern output of science-fiction novels and films found its genesis in speculative ponderings on the effect such progress could hold for the every day population, and just as often as not those speculations were damning. Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein and Fritz Lang's silent film Metropolis are two such works that hold great importance in the overall canon of science-fiction in that they are both seen as the first of their kind. It is often said that Mary Shelley, with her authorship of Frankenstein, gave birth to the science-fiction novel, breathing it into life as Frankenstein does his monster, and Lang's Metropolis is certainly a candidate for the first genuine science-fiction film (though a case can be made for Georges Méliès' 1902 film Le Voyage Dans la Lune, his film was barely fifteen minutes long whereas Lang's film, with its near three-hour original length and its blending of both ideas and stunning visuals, is much closer to what we now consider a modern science-fiction film). Yet though both works are separated by the medium with which they're presented, not to mention a period of over two-hundred years between their respective releases, they present a shared warning about the dangers that man's need fo...
Deadly and helpful, science is a dual-edged sword. Nathaniel Hawthorne is one of the first to emphasize this through his literary works. “Rappaccini's Daughter” and “The Birthmark” are two of his works where he teaches this lesson through the trials of his characters. Focusing on the motif of the “mad scientist”, Hawthorne brings to light the points that people struggle with humanity, learning to love themselves and others, and that science can be more harmful then helpful.
...cs and New Genetics” the ways that Factor X and human dignity spreads throughout society in the future show that it is the moral responsibility of society to continue to show others respect and dignity. Through the use of the pieces, “Human Dignity and Human Reproductive Cloning” by Steven Malby, “Genetic Testing and Its Implications: Human Genetics Researchers Grapple with Ethical Issues” by Isaac Rabino, and “Gender Differences in the Perception of Genetic Engineering Applied to Human Reproduction”,by Carol L. Napolitano and Oladele A. Ogunseitan, the decline on the amount of human dignity found in today's society as well as the regression in Factor X that can be found today compared to times past and how the increase in genetic engineering has greater caused for even more hurdles, for the spread of human dignity and Factor X to all members of society, to overcome.
The Best Science Fiction of the Twentieth Century. Ed. Orson Scott Card. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group, 2001. 212-217.
The further science advances, the more complex the ethical dilemmas in this field become. We often view scientific advancements, particularly in relation to our health, as beneficial. Health care involving stem cells or other cutting edge technology can save lives. However, although these advances are made with a noble goal in mind and can be advantageous, they do not come without consequences. Margaret Atwood uses diction in her dystopian novel “Year of the Flood” to address the ethical dilemmas that arise in the interaction between scientific advances, healthcare, the environment, and human nature to provide a modern perspective of a dystopian world.
In today’s world of genetically engineered hearts and genetically altered glowing rats, the story of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, seems as if it could be seen in the newspapers in our near future. The discoveries seen in modern science, as well as in the novel, often have controversy and negative consequences that follow them, the biggest of which being the responsibility the creator of life has to what has been created. Victor Frankenstein suffers from a variety of internal and external conflicts stemming from the creation of his monster, which in return also experiences similar problems. Shelley uses these tumultuous issues to portray the discrepancies between right and wrong, particularly through romanticism and the knowledge of science.
Kornbluth, C. M. "The Failure of the Science Fiction Novel As Social Criticism." The Science Fiction Novel: Imagination and Social Criticism. (1969): 64-101.
H. G. Wells had rather extreme views in every respect. He was a prominent Fabian for some time and upheld many socialistic ideas that many still have a problem with. His views on human nature were pessimistic, the future was an eventual disappointment, but his writing is the kind that can capture the attention of many people from all ages and walks of life and draw attention to his ideas—which he did to great effect. What makes these books so fascinating? To answer questions such as these, it is imperative to know about the life of the man behind the books. Herbert George Wells was born on September 21, 1866 into a lower middle class family. He worked hard as both a student and assistant to multiple jobs before moving to London with a scholarship to the Royal Academy of Science. It was here that he was introduced to “Darwin’s Bulldog”, the eminent biologist T. H. Huxley, a man whose opinions helped shape Wells’ own for the rest of his life. Instead of becoming a biologist as recommended by Huxley, he became instead a teacher, and overworked himself until he fell into very bad health. On the doctor’s orders, he went to the south coast of England to rest until he ran out of money and returned to London. It was around this time that he met Frank Harris, editor of the “Saturday Review” newspaper, and began his careers as both a novelist and a journalist. Throughout the rest of his life he wrote steadily, averaging a little more than a book per year. In following his writing, one can see four distinct styles emerging throughout it all. At the beginning he went through a science-fiction phase containing books such as The Time Machine, The War of the Worlds, and the Invisible Man. The second phase contained his “humorous Dickensian novel...
...ne starts life with an equal chance of health and success. Yet, gene therapy can also be thought of as a straight route towards a dark outlook, where perfection is the first priority, genes are seen as the ultimate puppeteer, and personal freedom to thrive based on one’s self isn’t believed to exist. With the emergence of each new technological discovery comes the emergence of each new ethical debate, and one day, each viewpoint on this momentous issue may be able to find a bit of truth in the other. Eventually, our society may reach a compromise on gene therapy.
Mae-Wan, Ho. Genetic engineering : dream or nightmare? : turning the tide on the brave new world of bad science and big business. New York : Continuum, 2000.
Biology is the science of life. Technology uses science to solve problems. Our society has progressed in its understanding of life to the point that we are able to manipulate it on a fundamental level through technology. This has led to profound ethical dilemmas. The movie Gattaca explores some important bioethical issues that are currently the focus of much dispute. The underlying thematic issue presented is the question of the extent to which biologically inherent human potential determines the true potential of a person. Perhaps the most controversial issue in Gattaca is the use of genetic engineering technology in humans to create a more perfect society; this is, essentially, a new method of Eugenics. Another related issue seen in the movie is that of pre-natal selection. Through the use of the same or similar technologies, parents are able to choose the characteristics with which their children will be born.
With the advancement of technology and science, we are now able to genetically modify animals. Mary Shelley found a way to make science an epitome, and confirms what could happen if science is taken too far. In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is considered to be a historical novel, based on scientific advancements. In this novel Shelley depicts her own definition of human nature, by showing the creature and the ways that humans react to him. The novel also showed the differences between morality and science.
Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a time of great change in America. In the mid-nineteenth century, Americans began to experience a shift in focus from the once stringent religious outlook to a more scientific view of the world and its natural wonders. Americans, however, did look at these new scientific discoveries with much hesitation, questioning their long-term effects on society as a whole. Hawthorne’ s work, “The Birth Mark echoes these sentiments and combine natural faith with a confidence in science to make a very interesting tale. This tale and its morality convey a message to the reader that there is a price for tampering with the natural order of things.
One of the most pressing issues in Brave New World is the use of science and technology and how it affects people’s lives. In the novel, technology is far more advanced than it was in Huxley’s time. One of the main uses of technology in the book is for making human beings. Humans are no longer born, but rather “decanted (Huxley 18).” Technology and science are used to make an embryo into whatever kind of human that is desired.