Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greek drama themes
Apollo Dionysus comparison
Apollo Dionysus comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek drama themes
Throughout The Bacchae, Euripides uses the Greek myth of Dionysus’s revenge on Pentheus, the king of Thebes, and his mother, Agave, to compare the complex worlds of nature versus man. From the entrance of the royal palace of Thebes there are two paths, the first of which leads east to the wilderness of Cithaeron, while the other leads west to the ancient city of Thebes. Is it possible that these two locations are merely the random setting of this Greek Tragedy, or are they meant to give deeper insight into the delicate balance between rationality and savagery in human society? The answer is clearly the latter. The opposing ideas that these locations represent, along with Euripides’s use of conflict, juxtaposition, extended metaphor, irony, and imagery, help to fully convey one of the overall messages of his work: not only will there always be a place for the irrational within an ordered society, but it is necessary in order for a healthy society or mind to thrive. For the duration of the play, Euripides utilizes dichotomies …show more content…
The untamed frenzy of the wilderness of Cithaeron is a personification of Dionysus, while the man made city of Thebes can be understood as Pentheus. The climax of the play occurs, as Pentheus is dismembered by his own mother after trying to spy on the Maenads in a final attempt to control the uncontrollable. Pentheus is challenging the human desire for Dionysian experience by bringing the ideals of the city into the wilderness. By choosing to the express the character foil between Dionysus and Pentheus as the clashing between the wilderness and civilization, especially in that scene, Euripides expresses that human society cannot survive solely based on reason and that those who try to suppress the unordered and emotional aspects of human nature, will in turn become the destructive force they were trying to
ABSTRACT: I analyse the dramatic setting of the Gorgias by contrasting it with that of the Protagoras. The two dialogues are closely related. In the Gorgias Socrates states that the rhetorician and the sophist are basically indistinguishable in everyday life. In both the Protagoras and the Gorgias, his confrontation with his interlocutors is metaphorically related to a descent to Hades. However, while the events in the Protagoras are narrated by Socrates himself, the Gorgias has readers face the unfolding events without mediation. The temporal and spatial framing of the Gorgias is indeterminate, while both aspects are described in detail in the Protagoras. I maintain that the magical passage from an indeterminate "outside" to an indeterminate "inside" in the Gorgias is significantly related to the characters' attitude towards the boundaries of each other's souls, which are constantly ignored or attacked. As a matter of fact, the dialogue presents a very impressive amount of anger and exchange of abuse, which never ceases until the end. I suggest that the temporal framing demonstrates that the beginning and the end of the dialogue are closely connected. Socrates unexpectedly arrives and refutes Gorgias by asking him unexpected questions. The last myth of judgment indicates that Gorgias' attitude is comparable to that of the mortals who lived during Kronos' age, while Socrates brings about a liberation from appearance which is analogous to the innovations brought about by Zeus.
The relationship between civilisation and barbarity is an eminent theme in the works of antiquity, whose civilisations concerned themselves with eschewing the improper mores of the barbarous. Whether it was the savant Greeks, cosmopolitan Romans, or ascetic early Christians, barbarous behaviour was considered odious, and their supposed superiority to brutes was a source of pride. But these themes, whilst contrastive, aren't categorical; rather, they're amorphous ideas, shaped by an author's use of them in the text. This essay will examine the variance in the relationships between civility and barbarity in Milton's "Comus", and Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus (abbreviated to Titus), thus establishing how these themes are malleable ones that the author can manipulate in the text. To begin, I'll establish the versions of civility and barbarity found in these texts, then I'll examine the texts apropos to several other topics, which shall further define and contrast their relationships between civility and barbarity.
Prometheus Bound is quite different from other tragedies in that it is peopled entirely by gods. The play focuses on the story of Prometheus, and we have versions of this myth in Hesiod's famous works. There is reason to think that the author of Prometheus Bound was not only acquainted with Hesiod's version but actually drew on Hesiod directly in this play. This essay therefore aims to establish in what ways the author of Prometheus Bound seems to have drawn from Hesiod's version of myth, in what ways he has diverged from it, and what reasons he might have had for making these changes and innovations. This might therefore highlight any particular emphasis or purpose of Prometheus Bound and what its author might have been trying to get across. Though there is not space in this essay to discuss the problems of attributing this play, it must be recognised that this ambiguity of authorship and dating makes it even more difficult than usual to look at views and purposes behind the play.
Euripdies' The Bacchae is known for its celebration of women's rebellion and patriarchial overthrow, claims which hold truth if not supremely. The Thebans, along with other women, pursue the rituals and culture of Dionysus’s cult which enacts their rebellion against men and the laws of their community. However, this motion to go aginst feminine norms is short lived as they lose power. When Agave comes to her epiphany, Dionysus is the one who is triumphant over Pentheus's death, not Agave or her sisters These women must be punished for their rebellion against both men and community. This female power is weakened and the rebellion muted in order to bring back social order and also to provide the story with a close. Female rebellion actually becomes oppressed through The Bacchae due to its conseqences and leading events of the play. This alludes to the message that women who do not follow traditional roles of femininity are subject to the destruction of an established society.
In The Bacchae, Euripedes portrays the character of Pentheus as an ignorant, stubborn, and arrogant ruler. These character flaws accompanied with his foolish decisions set the stage for his tragic downfall. Pentheus' blatant disregard to all warnings and incidents, which prove that Dionysus is truly a god, lead him to his own death. In the end, his mistakes are unforgiving and his punishment is just.
In Ovid’s Metamorphoses, readers are given stories about transformations and many are about unrequited love. One such tale is of Narcissus and Echo, and within this story is a metaphor encapsulating the gist of the entire tale. “… But while he tries/to quench one thirst, he feels another rise:…” (ln 32-33 93). This metaphor explains the situation in which Narcissus meets his downfall, gives examples of his character traits, and proves a universal theme stemming from this myth’s character.
with Turnus. In book XII Turnus states that the fight should be between the two
Many different interpretations can be derived from themes in Euripides's The Bacchae, most of which assume that, in order to punish the women of Thebes for their impudence, the god Dionysus drove them mad. However, there is evidence to believe that another factor played into this confrontation. Because of the trend of male dominance in Greek society, women suffered in oppression and bore a social stigma which led to their own vulnerability in becoming Dionysus's target. In essence, the Thebian women practically fostered Dionysian insanity through their longing to rebel against social norms. Their debilitating conditions as women prompted them to search for a way to transfigure themselves with male qualities in order to abandon their social subordination.
Similarly, the only way to beat a child on the verge of a temper tantrum at “Chutes and Ladders” is to forfeit. These similarities suggest that the world is an unwinnable game that can only be won by refusing to play. However, Sophocles’ message regarding life and the world requires a more in depth view of the forfeit. Each time a character refused to play, it is a voluntary action. Therefore, Sophocles suggests that in order to survive in the world, a person must be in charge of their own actions. Sophocles demonstrates the danger of succumbing to involuntary actions through Thebes’ subservience that correlates with its ignorance. As a result of the city’s societal conditions of ignorance and subservience, the reader views the the city as weak. Sophocles’ message about voluntary and deliberate actions aligns with his belief in democracy. Corresponding to the major motifs of the play, a democracy’s basis is deliberate actions by individuals who are neither subservient nor ignorant. Oedipus Rex is both a warning against tyrannies, like prophecies, that completely dictate lives and an advocate for democracies with which life is finally
Emotions from a betrayal range from person to person, anywhere from being distraught to having a feeling similar of the heart being tightly squeezed and then being ripped out of its spot and thrown on the floor. Medea in the beginning displays her emotions by being a hot mess, crying her eyes out and wailing for the whole world to hear, or at least the characters around her. While many characters do not have names other than what they are, Euripides has them as minor characters to help give the audience and reader’s details that back then, had to be explained when used in a play. In the first paragraph, the Nurse uses direct observation when she states, “For Jason hath betrayed his own children and my mistress. Here she lies fasting, yielding
Cavafy’s “Ithaca” advises a traveler on the extensive journey to Ithaca, providing suggested steps to a well-lived life. It reveals that one should pursue many experiences in life to grow “wealthy with all [one has] gained on the way” (30), including “fine things,…sensual perfumes” (19, 21) and wisdom. This wealth may relate to grasping beauty as the opportunities appear and making the most of these gifts. Cavafy express that these luxuries compose part of the enjoyment sought after and add another layer to the richness of one’s life. in addition, “Ithaca” indicates that one will not encounter “Laistrygonians, Cyclops, [and] wild Poseidon” (10-12) unless one brings “them along inside” (12). The monsters, alluding to the troubles Odysseus faces along his travels, reveal that one will not encounter internal troubles if optimistic thoughts and an excited spirit persist in one’s mind and actions. Through his optimistic tone, Cavafy expresses m...
How do we define reason as just? When asked this question, it really makes you begin to wonder how to depict what one might think is just. In the story of Medea, reason is what drives many of the characters actions. For example, the reason that Jason leaves Medea for Creon's daughter is for his own benefit. Is that just? Medea then kills Creon and his daughter for revenge against Jason. Is that just?.
...looks at these stories without identifying oneself with anyone, it becomes obvious that there is little difference between the savage and the civilized. If murder is a savage crime, then Odysseus was just as much a savage as Polyphemus, but what makes Odysseus worse, is that his actions affected more people than the cannibalism of Polyphemus, yet he is still regarded as a hero for his behavior. In turn, Candide is no more civilized than the Lobeiros tribe, as he had committed murder before but he justifies his action, just as the actions of murder, rape and maiming are justified if they are committed by the inside group, the so-called civilized world. Therefore the real savageness of people, exemplified by Odysseus and Candide, manifests in ignorance and rigidity, yet there is a certain kind of comedy in that really nothing has changed since the beginning of time.
This paper aims to study two significant playwrights, Sophocles and Euripides, and compare their respective attitudes by examining their plays in respect to plot and character structures. To achieve this goal, the paper is organized into two main sections. In the first section, we provide a brief biography of both Sophocles and Euripides. The second and last section includes summaries of Sophocles’ Electra and Euripides’ Electra which were based on same essentials and give an opportunity to observe the differences of the playwrights. This section also includes the comparisons that are made by our observations about the plays.
Sophocles’ tragic drama, Oedipus Rex, presents to the reader a full range of conflicts and their resolution after a climax.