Satire: The Powerless Against The Powerful

543 Words2 Pages

Molly Ivins once said “satire is traditionally the weapon of the powerless against the powerful”, this excessively explains the purpose of satire in the current status quo. Satire plays a vital role in bringing out the sarcasm in a situation. Nonetheless when satire comes, it comes with people who are entertained by it, people who might be offended, and the specific tone and detail the author uses. In today’s society many individuals alleviate cruel situations with jokes. While not pertaining to the whole crowd, some people find certain satire funny. For instance, satire that brings out the most laughs are political cartoons. Source F articulates the fact that McCain is old and Obama is working against the United States. People who find this satire funny are probably people who dislike Obama and McCain. Not only that, but people find satire funny based on who they are and what they believe. The wrong type of satire for that person could generally lead to someone being offended if it goes against his or her beliefs. …show more content…

Depending on what type of person one is, and what they believe in, if one sees something that they are against, they will probably be offended. That is the irony in satire, while it is supposed to make people laugh, they get mad. For example, source C notes that this reckless teenager crashed his car and hurt another family without experiencing any consequences. In the text it states, “Trivial humiliation of being taunted by his peers for driving a slightly less expensive vehicle” (Source C), this accurately portrays an image of the rich ruling this world. The type of people who would be offended by this are middle class citizens, furious at the fact that if someone has a plethora of money then they run this

More about Satire: The Powerless Against The Powerful

Open Document