Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Samurai vs knights
Who would win a samurai or a spartan?
Samurai and Spartans were the elite soldiers of their age. Both were trained from a young age to fight for their cause. Which of these elite soldiers is the strongest. By comparing the training, weapons, armor and formations of these two groups we will see who would end up on top if these two elite fighting forces ever went head to head.
Samurai are the highly trained swordsmen and nobility of Japan. Each Samurai began their martial arts training at the age of five and learned his weapons skills from members of his family that were already Samurai. These skills include mastering a sword and bow and learning how to act as a representative for their Daimyo. Samurai armor was made out of small metal plates
bound together into larger plates that were worn as webbing between the Breastplate, Greaves, and the arm guards. Samurai helmets were known as Kabuto and were made out of riveted metal plates worn over a leather cap. All Samurai wielded a Katana and a Wakizashi. The Katana was a longsword and was the main fighting weapon of the Samurai. Each Katana was a metalworking masterpiece with a soft and flexible iron core surrounded by steel that was heated and folded so many times that blades have millions of layers of steen on the cutting edge of the blade. A wakizashi was a samurai's second, shorter blade and it was used as backup for the main katana. Several Samurai also used a Naginata which was a long pole with a short blade on the end. (All Samurai information came from http://people.howstuffworks.com/samurai.htm) Spartans were the warriors that came from Sparta. The rigorous Spartan training, called Agoge, began at the age of seven. There were three stage to the Agoge, the Paídes (about ages 7–17), the Paidískoi (ages 17–19), and the Hēbōntes (ages 20–29). The Paídes stage consisted of preparing the children for battle by exposing them to the heavy physical training, the hunger, and the harsh conditions of the battle field as well as forming camaraderie so that they could work well together under stress. The Paidískoi stage acted like an apprenticeship, a young Spartan was trained in combat by a more experienced one. The Hēbōntes stage had the warriors refine their skills against one another, and at the end of this stage the Spartan Elder Council voted 20 new members into the Spartan military. Spartans carried a 7-9 foot spear called a Dory as their main weapon alongside a short sword and a large shield called a Aspis which generally weighed around 30 pounds and was also used as a blunt weapon. Spartan armor consisted of a Cuirass breastplate and Greaves to protect the shins. Spartans fought in phalanxes which had shield and spears overlapping to form a block of spears. (All Spartan information came from http://www.ancientmilitary.com/spartan-weapons.htm) In single combat a samurai would win. A samurai overall has better equipment and swordsmanship than a spartan. Samurai are used to fighting one on one and the experience would overwhelm the Spartan. Spartan armor would also not protect the arms and legs leaving the Spartan even more vulnerable to the Samurai in Single combat. However in mass combat the Spartans would win. In mass combat the Spartans would form a Phalanx to push through the spread out Samurai and defeat the Samurai with momentum and teamwork. In a war scenario the two sides would line up on opposite sides of a battlefield.
Knights and samurai have a lot in common. For example, they both follow a code and protect land. Although they are very similar, there are a lot of things that set them apart. Samurai had a different social status, had different weapons, and expectations. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the knights and this can be seen in their honor code, training, and armor.
Samurais or a knight? The question was, who would win the battle? A samurai - a samurai? Or a king of a knight? Of course they both have their advantages and disadvantages, but they also both have things in common that they can't do.
Many people often see little similarity between the country of Japan and Europe. However, there are actually several similarities between these two countries. In fact, Reischauer and Jansen note that Feudal Japan had departed so far from East Asian norms that it was more similar to medieval Europe than it was to China. Thus, the knight of Europe and the samurai of Japan despite a lack of contact with one another shared several common elements. This was a result of many similarities social and cultural influences experienced by the two distant countries.
Japanese Samurai-What did they wear? What weapon did they use? How were they physically and
As learners of Europe and Japan, the question “ who would win a battle-a samurai or knight” is commonly kept in mind. A samurai and knight are similar in many ways. A samurai would mostly win the battle because they have better weapons, armor, and training. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons, armor, and training.
Do you know someone in the military? A loved one, a friend, do you know what they go through? I may not, but I do know about the harsh training and war that occurred for the Samurais and Knights. In Europe and Japan the empires were falling and Clans were taking over Japan. The government came up with an idea to create feudalism. There was an agreement in both Europe and Japan that exchanged land for protection. The similarities between Samurai and Knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at the three most similar areas: social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death. The Samurai and Knights has their differences, but were the similarities greater than those differences.
In the book Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan, Karl Friday focuses on war in early medieval Japan. A central thesis could be the political primacy of the imperial court. (Lamers 2005) This is the tenth through fourteenth centuries, before the samurai became prominent in Japan and were trying to form themselves into more of what we think of them today. Friday focuses on five aspects of war in his book; they are the meaning of war, the organization of war, the tools of war, the science of war, and the culture of war.
First of all, training methods of knights and samurais were different. Samurai had various training for personal toughness at the battlefield.
Hellenic culture in the Spartan community was that of a humble elite. True Spartan culture is well captured in Xenophon’s work, Spartan Society, as he wrote of how this elitist society viewed not only themselves, but the other countries around them. This work shines light into the three-part worldview of the ancient, Hellenic Spartans of: humanism, idealism, and rationalism. As Xenophon begins to write over the whole of the Spartan society it can be seen how the Spartans lived out the worldview of this Hellenistic society. This living out of the worldview recorded in Xenophon’s, Spartan Society, illustrates their worldview through the noting of Lycurgus’ accomplishments and the contrast of the “other.”
Throughout History, there have been many different groups or events that are still widely known today. Groups of people such as the Indians or Vikings are popular groups which are referenced constantly in today’s society. However, none of these groups is more known or referenced than the Japanese Samurai. Originating in 646 AD, these Japanese warriors developed from a loose organization of farmers to the dominant social class in Feudal Japan. Along with their dominant military and political standing, the samurai brought with them a unique code or moral belief that became the core of Samurai culture. Because of this, the Samurai and their principles still affect modern day Japanese society with social customs today deriving directly and indirectly from the beliefs of the Samurai.
The Battle of Salamis is said to be one of the most important battles in all of history. It was a naval battle fought between the massive Persian army and smaller Greek army in the Bay of Salamis in 480 BCE. This battle was one of the many battles that were a part of the Greco-Persian war. This paper will explore the events leading up to the battle, the battle itself, including advantages and disadvantages both sides had on one and other, and finally will discuss the affects the result of this battle had on each side. Surprisingly, the much smaller Greek army defeated the Persians at the Battle of Salamis. How did this happen, one may ask? Although the Persians appeared to have the military advantage in this battle, particularly in terms of sheer size and numbers, the Greeks successfully defeated them with the help of their leaders, tactics, and many Persian blunders.
Beginning with Greek hoplite warfare, we will see how the Romans adopted Greek principles of warfare and evolved their strategy in order to confront new and emerging challenges. From improving their tactics, making advancements in weaponry, to creating a standing army staffed by professional soldiers, we will see how Rome’s military evolved in ways the Greeks could not compete with, and would eventually succumb to. We will see the rise of the most lethal institution of Roman society, the Roman Army.
The Spartan’s were a highly developed warrior based society. They came into the major military power through their highly developed military strategy. The men were required to be a part of the military if they were to be future citizens. The Spartans had a highly revered group of men, who decided if a
I believe we can all agree that Japanese samurais and European knights are two of the most skilled and famous forms of warriors in history, right? Well both warriors began their trade at a very young age, and went through multiple stages of training throughout their lives. They both had a code of honor basically, but they differed from one another in quite a few ways. The big question is, “Were the similarities greater than the differences?”. Right off the bat I began to ponder the technicalities of the answer to this question. Before I get too scrambled up in the technicalities, let’s discuss some these differences and the similarities and figure out how this plays out. Before we conduct this discussion, let’s review our key terms. A clan is a group of close-knit and interrelated families. Feudalism was a political and economic system that flourished in Europe from the 9th to the 15th century, based on higher classes giving random services and items in exchange for something else. Knights were men who served their lord as a mounted soldier in armor. Samurai’s were members of a powerful military social class in feudal Japan. A shogun was a hereditary commander-in-chief in feudal Japan. Chivalry was the medieval knightly system with its religious, moral, and social code. Bushido was the code of honor and morals developed by the Japanese samurai.
There are many historical aspects of the Japanese, but the most interesting is the history of the Samurai. In Japans history war played a large role in the country. Controlling clans fought for parts of the land and overall control of the country. These clans were powerful families that resided in the country and who all wanted power and control of Japan for themselves. The families that would be in control were known as Shoguns. These shoguns would have warriors that fought for them if any of the other clan families would try to attack him in order to overthrow him and take his power from him. The Samurai followed a code that developed from Chinese beliefs when in battle. The Samurais code was known as the Bushido. This code was also known as “The Way of The Warrior” which was the main belief s...