Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Easy on the roman military
Ancient greek vs roman military
Greek and roman army
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Easy on the roman military
“Si vis pacem, para bellum ; If you want peace, prepare for war”
Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus
Throughout known history, civilization was constantly changing, improving and evolving, creating great works, civic projects and institutions. Some societies in history achieved greater advances than others, but none would match the greatness of the Ancient Greeks and Romans. With their histories intertwined, one is hard pressed to discuss one without mentioning the other. Indeed, much of Roman culture was greatly influenced by the Greeks, whose societies were eventually dominated by the Romans. Although drawing from aspects of Greek culture, the Romans would inevitably shape their society in ways that are distinctly Roman, and none more distinct than in their method of warfare.
Beginning with Greek hoplite warfare, we will see how the Romans adopted Greek principles of warfare and evolved their strategy in order to confront new and emerging challenges. From improving their tactics, making advancements in weaponry, to creating a standing army staffed by professional soldiers, we will see how Rome’s military evolved in ways the Greeks could not compete with, and would eventually succumb to. We will see the rise of the most lethal institution of Roman society, the Roman Army.
Ancient Greece has a long history dating back to around 3000 B.C.E, but it is with the beginning of the polis in the Hellenic age in approximately 800 B.C.E. that we see a more organized institution and form of government. With several poleis throughout the Greek world, each polis cultivated the surrounding countryside in order to provide food for their society. At times conflict would arise between different poleis over territorial disputes, and a battle would...
... middle of paper ...
... of it being influenced by one of the greatest military forces in history, the Roman war machine.
Works Cited
John Keegan, A History of Warfare (Vintage: Random House 1993
Xenophon, Hellenica IV.3.19
Carey, Allfree, Cairns, Warfare in the Ancient World (Pen and Sword Military 2005)
John Lazenby, Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience (London and New York: Routledge, 1991)
Lazenby, The Spartan Army (Stackpole 1985)
F.E. Adcock, The Roman Art of War under the Republic (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1960)
Gabriel, Metz, From Sumer to Rome: The Military Capabilities of Ancient Armies (Praeger 1991)
Livy, History of Rome XXXI.34.4
O’Connell, The Roman Killing Machine; Quarterly Journal of Military History (Autumn, 1988)
Keppie, Making of the Roman Army (University of Oklahoma Press, 1998)
Martin Van Creveld, Technology and War (Macmillan, Free Press, 1989)
“This account I have given the reader, not so much with the intention of commending the Romans, as of comforting those that have been conquered by them, and for the deterring others from attempting innovations under their government. This discourse of the Roman military conduct may also perhaps be of use to such of the curious as are ignorant of it, and yet have a mind to know it.” –excerpt from “Description of the Roman Army,” by Josephus
“While stands the Coliseum, Rome shall stand; When falls the Coliseum, Rome shall fall; And when Rome falls - the World.” Lord Byron. This essay will discuss the similarities of military, economics and systems of government between the Roman Empire of the 6th century BCE and the United States of America of the 20th century. History has revealed that all superpowers fall eventually, although much time has passed since the glory days of Rome we see in 2015 the largest superpower in charge, the United States. There are many similarities that can be drawn between the American superpower and the Roman Empire such as the same founding of government and both dominated in military, as well as economic similarities. This leads to the conclusion that because the rise to power between the two powers was so similar, the downfall will be equally parallel.
Greeks and Romans are famous for the strategy's that they used. The Greeks main strategy was called the Phanlax. They basically have a rectangle of troops and each on...
The Roman Army was a masterpiece in itself. There was no other army like it, and was impenentrable. This was probably because of the extreme patriotism and pride in battling for Rome, and maintaining their superiority. Gladiator, "RomanArmy.com", and The History of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire all portray this patriotism in many aspects.
The Roman Republic had an upstanding infrastructure, a stable social system, and a balanced constitution that solidified Rome’s greatness. Regardless of its achievements, however, the Roman Republic owes much of its success to classical Greek cultures. These cultures, in conjunction with the fundamental values of Roman society, certified Rome as one of the most significant powers the world has ever seen.
Thomas Jefferson once said “every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans…” and Jefferson was nearly correct in his saying. The Ancient Greeks and Romans were and are still considered some of the most renowned and well-known early European civilization. Despite having a handful of differences and being known for different advancements and creations, one of Greece and Rome’s better known achievements were their military and the technology and strategy that surrounds it.
Ancient Greece, Sparta especially, and Ancient Rome were best known for their military tactics and strategies. In the Greek city-state Sparta, military went as far as making every male citizen a hoplite, warriors of Ancient Greece, and go through a mandatory training program, agoge, or put through public humiliation (Park and Love). It is impossible to say that both Rome and Sparta neglected the idea of implementing warfare into their daily lives.
Although both Roman and Greek civilizations shared similarities in the areas of art and literature, their differences were many and prominent. Their contrasting aspects rest mainly upon political systems and engineering progress, but there are also several small discrepancies that distinguish between these two societies. This essay will examine these differences and explain why, ultimately, Rome was the more advanced civilization of the two.
The strength of the Roman military was the string that held the Roman Empire together for as long as it lasted. The military was made up of strictly disciplined men whom were ready and willing to serve their emperor.
Military success through history can be attributed to a variety of facets;, great men, moral, tactical awareness, and numerous other traits. , However, all of these contributions at their root though are a product of a system’s military culture. Historically many systems saw success in military expeditions because of cultural ties; the Spartans with their Agoge training, the Romans and their evolution of civic militarism, the Jihad of the decentralized Muslim caliphs. One of the finest systems to analyze cultural success in war though is a study of the Varangian Guard, an elite mercenary group that served the Byzantine Empire for about 600 years. The guard’s cultural influence was variable through its history of service and the success in
The empire that the Roman’s built can be argued to have been the greatest in world history. The Roman Empire controlled the largest land area in European history and influenced a huge region, acting as a cultural center for the entire continent of Europe. Their strength derived from their prowess and skill on the battlefield. The Roman Army was extremely effective and became the basis of our military structure today by utilizing technological advances in strategy and weaponry, and simply having more discipline.
Marcel Le Glay, Jean-Louis Voisin, Yann Le Bohec. A History of Rome. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Rich, John and Graham Shipley. War and Society In The Roman World. London: Routledge, 1993.
Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave and kept under a close eye to prevent insurgence (History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece). Additionally, Sparta had strict and trained soldiers that underwent intense physical exercising and instruction.
Instead of merely falling in love with the winners, I try to summarize the reasons contributing to their victories. From the Roman army’s strategical formations and their creative use of shields, to combination of sizes, shapes and positions of the armor on vehicles in WWII, they are all important contributing elements and thought-provoking. Through these stunning plots of history, I gradually found out the power of knowledge and the ability to think out of the box are the keys of our