Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Political modernisation of japan by meiji
Meiji restoration and modernization of japan
Meiji restoration and modernization of japan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1877, a series of rebellions occurred in Meiji Japan. These rebellions are often referred to as some of the most famous and ironically aided in the destruction of the samurai class although the reverse is what the rebels wanted to do. Satsuma's faction leader, Saigo Takamori, who was the leader of said rebellion, followed a series of rebellions in other parts of Japan such as Hagi, Akizuki and Kumamoto. He had been morally supporting these rebellions, but he never took part in them. Soon, he received news of a possible assassination against him, and this rumour prompted him to gather his allies and head toward Kumamoto, in attempt to force their surrender. The official purpose of this rebellion was to accompany Saigo to the capital so that …show more content…
he could “question” (jinmon) the Tokyo government. This was the start of Saigo’s Satsuma army, the beginning of the rebellion that altered the way Japan’s government ruled and the way its country functioned. After Commodore Matthew C. Perry visited Japan and forced them to open their ports, lest they be destroyed, Japan realized they were militarily weak compared to Western countries and they had no choice but to accept an unfair treaty. Although Japan had kept the peace for more than two centuries, it had done so officially as a military administration acting for the emperor, which delegated enormous powers and responsibilities to provincial lords, particularly with respects to maintaining troops. It became more important for Japan to modernize its military and technology, even if it meant adapting ideas from the Western countries. The Tokugawa were displeased about this, but no major act in the rebellion began until later on. The bakufu at this time was losing power and forces from Choshu were able to defeat bakufu forces in 1866, which led to support for the Tokugawa to dwindle more than it had been. In 1868 they collapsed entirely. At their collapse, the former rebel forces returned the Meiji emperor to power— even though it was the rebel samurai who were really ruling Japan—so it was an ‘emperor run’ country again. After the restoration, Western practices became adopted throughout Japan, which meant demolishing the pre-Meiji laws and samurai privileges were virtually removed. They were no longer allowed to don their traditional swords or topknots, and after a short while they were not given any more compensation or lump-sums and sunk to commoner class. For many of the samurai, this was a huge blow to their prestige. Saigo Takamori was one of these samurai who wanted to keep the existing government structure as it was instead of adopting Western practices. He was not necessarily xenophobic, however, he believed that Japan itself would function better as it was than how it would become. He resigned from his position because of his ideas to invade Korea that the government did not agree with, as well as his ideas about the government changes. When the government attempted to seize his store of arms at Kagoshima and there were rumours they had come to assassinate him, he raised a revolt. About forty thousand resentful samurai, furious over the abolition of the wearing of two swords and virtually impoverished by the commutation of pensions, joined his insurrection. This Satsuma Rebellion was the final act of resistance towards the Meiji Restoration and the adaption of foreign governmental structure. Saigo had only intended to go talk with the government in Tokyo one on one and question them about what had happened with his store of arms and the strange rumours, but an army of his supporters had already gone ahead, knowing he would not abandon them, and instead would take position as their leader.
Soon after, Taketa Tani, a general of Kumamoto castle received two letters allegedly both from Saigo. The first was brief and stated that his army would be coming to attack, but little is believed that this letter was truly from Saigo because it was not his handwriting. The second letter was also brief, but polite. It stated his army would be passing through Kumamoto castle to peacefully carry out their mission. Taketa Tani, however, had no plans to let this happen even if it was a peaceful …show more content…
mission. When Saigo’s army arrived, the weather was near freezing and it was snowing hard, but many small fights occurred for days on end until both sides parted. When the fighting finally continued, days later, reinforcements had arrived. General Aritomo Yamagata, who was a Choshu samurai, and a good friend of Saigo’s, was the commander for the Imperial side of the battle. Although the Japanese government had equipped the imperial army with modern weapons, at Kumamoto their greatest asset was the castle itself, one of the great fortresses of the seventeenth century. It was well equipped with weapons and it was a stable defense for the Imperial army considering it was on an incline. The Satsuma army, though, were aided by ex-samurai who were very familiar with the ground in Kumamoto, and initially repulsed the reinforcements, however, Imperial solders who were superior in numbers, pushed on the next day and a ferocious battle emerged. On March fourth, the Imperial army began its offensive attack along the sea stretching to Tabaruzaka. The opposing Satsuma army returned the attack, and this set the stage for the next couple of weeks of fighting as more reinforcements arrived. Both sides fought with devastating ferocity and each side lost about four thousand men to the fighting. Despite this, the small supply of food remaining and a heavy rain they were fighting in, the rebels held their positions until March twentieth, when the Imperial army seized their base, forcing them into the town of Ueki, where they, again, held their position until April second. A final attack was planned for April fourteenth against the rebel Satsuma army, but failed due to the fact that Saigo disengaged from the battle and the withdrawal of his men to higher grounds, which ended the fifty-four day battle. Both sides suffered twenty percent casualties, with 186 soldiers and police killed and 587 wounded. The Imperial army was able to easily replace their lost forces and between May and September, they chased the rebel Satsuma army across Kyushu, even though the rebels no longer wanted to reach Tokyo and instead wanted to return home. In Miyakonojo on July twenty-forth, the Imperial army cornered the rebels and defeated them, then turned around to chase Saigo where they caught up to him in Enodake. Although they had finally caught up to him, he managed to escape again as he’d done so many times before. Saigo and his few remaining men then retreated back into Kagoshima where the final battle took place. Yamagata was so determined to end the battle that he told his men to hold their positions no matter what. A fierce battle occurred on September twenty-forth, and it was the last battle before Saigo’s death. It lasted the night and by early morning, since he was wounded and unable to fight in the remainder of the battle, Saigo chose to perform ritual suicide. The Satsuma Rebellion ended at seven in the morning. What was thought to have been one of the biggest threats toward Japan’s modernization was this series of rebellions, however, the battle itself showed samurai in a rather bad light considering the rebellion began because those samurai were fighting to keep Japan the way it was.
It was evident that they had been wrong about how Japan would be better off isolated from Western technology, because it was help from that Western technology that the Imperial army was able to defeat the Satsuma rebels and set the path toward a modernized country. Modern Japan had been passed with its people, and although Saigo’s plan to keep things as they were had ultimately failed and completely did away with the samurai class, his strength and principles were broadcasted through Japan through this battle. Word reached all over the country and made an impression that lasted. A statue was built in his honour in Ueno and the title “traitor” was taken out of his name.
The entire Satsuma Rebellion from start to finish effectively got rid of the samurai class, proved to the country how they needed to modernize, lest what happened to the rebels could happen to them in general if another country decided to attack and set the path down toward, finally, an uninterrupted modern
Japan.
Samurais or a knight? The question was, who would win the battle? A samurai - a samurai? Or a king of a knight? Of course they both have their advantages and disadvantages, but they also both have things in common that they can't do.
In the book Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan, Karl Friday focuses on war in early medieval Japan. A central thesis could be the political primacy of the imperial court. (Lamers 2005) This is the tenth through fourteenth centuries, before the samurai became prominent in Japan and were trying to form themselves into more of what we think of them today. Friday focuses on five aspects of war in his book; they are the meaning of war, the organization of war, the tools of war, the science of war, and the culture of war.
The Last Samurai is a film that is often used to teach history in classes. The last Samurai represents the end of an era. The film does a good job of teaching many parts of Japanese History. This movie teaches us about the way of the Samurai, and their beliefs and traditions. The movie also expresses what life was like during the Meiji Restoration. You can see in the movie that technology started to advance, gradually decreasing the amount of Samurais. The Satsuma Rebellion, which lasted for 6 months, was shown in the movie as a battle between tradition and modernisation. Even though this film is not entirely accurate, it has some key historical events which are good for learning about this historic period.
Japanese revolts ensue with the opening of Japan to the Western World. The middle and lower classes wanted Japan to be open while the conservative daimyo did not. Both of these groups looked to the emperor for a decision. The shogunate, reliant on the isolation, collapsed under pressures caused by outsid...
The samurai of Tokugawa Japan, the yangban of Choson Korea, and the gentry of Ming China were three very powerful and elite groups of East Asia. These groups consisted of high ranking government officials with judicial power and influence. Although the groups were located in the same region they had their similarities and differences in how they obtained power and how they used their power. Japanese samurai were military nobility who had almost as much power as the emperor, but were not the highest ranking officials whereas the yangban officials of Korea were the highest ranking rulers. The gentry of the Ming period of China were once high ranking rulers; however, the gentry were defined as retired Chinese bureaucrats. Socially, all of these groups, at one point or another, were high ranking officials with power in office. The elite groups ruled in different areas of Asia, but they had similarities as well as differences in sources of power, functions as officials, and the problems they faced as elite groups in Asia.
Japan is part of our world that not many people know, for the few that do, they know that Japan is filled with an extraordinary history. Some of the history starts with little traditions like, the tradition of kimono’s, to big ones such as their well known Japanese festivals. Ancient Japan was a series of islands and many cultural expansions which included religion, armies, art, classic traditions, and their type of clothing. Ancient Japanese is still alive today, from basic works of art, to then a following of certain religions such as Shinto and Buddhism. Many Americans don’t the cultural aspects that were attributed by many across the world, they don’t know that many of those aspects made what Japan is today in society.
Musui’s Story is the exciting tale of a low class samurai’s life towards the end of the Tokugawa era. Although one would normally imagine a samurai to be a noble illustrious figure, Musui’s Story portrays the rather ignominious life of an unemployed samurai. Nonetheless, this primary account demonstrates the tenacity of samurai values and privileges present at the end of the Tokugawa shogunate. The social status of samurai had been elevated to such a state that even someone like Musui was easily able to gain influence in everyday affairs with his privileges. Not only that, but he had retained his values as a warrior and still kept great pride for his arts in weaponry.
During the 17th and 18th centuries, the Chinese and Japanese faced much internal conflict, but while China faced a combination of economic setbacks and political weakness, the Japanese were riddled with wars along their countryside. First, the Chinese emperor was too weak in comparison to his bureaucracy, which ended up making most of the decisions for the last Ming dynasty emperor. This was due to the emperor’s realization that having a title as Son of Heaven did not mean he had all the power of the empire. Instead he lived a laid back life where the bureaucrats vied for power and wealth amongst themselves and he merely managed them. Like the Chinese, the Japanese also saw elites battling it out for power, but this time on the battlefield with armies of samurai. These battles put Japan in a period much like the Warring States period in early Chinese history, where families fought and fought for power almost endlessly. The political weakness in China contributed to its economic failure as well. With no force to manage to seas, pirates were free to raid trade ships and villages along the coast line, weakening the Chinese economy that relied on a transport system to supply the country. These two major forces led to China’s fragmentation and eventual takeover by the Manchu. In contrast, the battles happening in Japan were not harmful to the economy as much as they were in China. This is due to the fact that the Japanese daimyos were independent...
The goals of the Meiji Restoration included dismantling of the old feudal regime and the creation of a nation-state capable of standing equal among Western powers, including the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and the Unites States. The leaders of the Meiji Restoration were mostly young samurai motivated by increasing domestic problems and threats of foreign intrusion. Saigō Takamori was also an influential leader in the Meiji Restoration. He was responsible for leading several rebellions against the government in companionship with samurai warriors and peasants who distrusted the new regime. The citizens of Japan were also, arguably, influential leaders of the Meiji restoration. Under their pressure to insist on the creation of a constitutional government, the government formed a Cabinet system in 1885 and in 1886 began developing the Constitution, which would be presented as a gift from the emperor to the people in 1889 and established a bicameral parliament. Revolutionary tactics from the Meiji Restoration included the development of transportation and communication. Railroads were built, telegraphs connecting major cities, and the institution of a European-style banking system developed. We can clearly recognize differences between the revolutionary tactics of the Meiji Restoration to those in the Mexican Revolution and those in the
Throughout History, there have been many different groups or events that are still widely known today. Groups of people such as the Indians or Vikings are popular groups which are referenced constantly in today’s society. However, none of these groups is more known or referenced than the Japanese Samurai. Originating in 646 AD, these Japanese warriors developed from a loose organization of farmers to the dominant social class in Feudal Japan. Along with their dominant military and political standing, the samurai brought with them a unique code or moral belief that became the core of Samurai culture. Because of this, the Samurai and their principles still affect modern day Japanese society with social customs today deriving directly and indirectly from the beliefs of the Samurai.
The term samurai was first used in the 10th century and means “those who serve”. In the beginning it stood for men who guarded the capital for the Emperor, some where used as tax collectors. Later the word grew to include any military man who served a powerful landlord, almost like a police force for that time. They would go around the countryside on horseback collecting taxes from the peasants, often this was in the form of rice. This money helped the Emperor pay for his lavish life style. The word, samurai, quickly spread and was respected (and maybe feared a little) for the men it represented.
The samurai are a type of warrior class in Japan similar to the European knights. They were not only used as soldiers for combat in war but they also replaced the court government in terms of managing the local government. They pledged to keep the peace and stay loyal to their master. This is how they were used for most of history until the end of the Tokugawa period. Their rise all begins in the Kamakura period.
The Last Samurai depicted the Japanese monarchy in the light that they had attempted to destroy their system of feudalism, which they had in place for thousands of years, with that of monstrosity. The movie differentiates between warriors who fought for honor and loyalty, battling against red, white and blue savages who only fought for greed and power. This is the lasting label/influence that America has to offer the world; monsters who destroyed anything in their paths at the cost of receiving false success. Americans have done their fair share of unethical acts to get to their position of power in the world. By influencing and sharing their methods with Japan, they extended their reach of corrupt innovation. With this help, Japan did to its own people what Americans had done to the people of their homeland.
This film opens up on that thought and it expands on it showing that though they were widely respected there was an age of samurai that never knew war and just held a title. Most people don’t understand that the age of samurai during this time of peace were not warriors but shifted to a different role. From the basic knowledge from what society knows of the samurai this is not widely known. Samurai’s were still respected but they did not have the experience of war but still held themselves in the same
She encourages Taro to take direct control of the Ichimonji clan. Hidetora leaves the castle with a few loyal retainers and goes to Jiro’s castle. However, Jiro does not Hidetori’s followers inside the castle, so Hidetori leaves again. The old Lord and his followers are attacked by Taro and Jiro.