Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Womens role in literature
Warlord Hidetori Ichimonji decides to divide his fiefdom among his three sons. His eldest son Taro and middle son Jiro promise to support him for after his abdication. The youngest son Saburo disagrees so Hidetori banishes Saburo. Taro's wife Lady Kaede wants to take revenge on Ichimonji clan for massacring her family. She encourages Taro to take direct control of the Ichimonji clan. Hidetora leaves the castle with a few loyal retainers and goes to Jiro’s castle. However, Jiro does not Hidetori’s followers inside the castle, so Hidetori leaves again. The old Lord and his followers are attacked by Taro and Jiro. Most of his followers die and he becomes mad. Tango and Kyoami find him wandering in the wilderness. Jiro becomes the Great Lord of the Ichimonji clan. Lady Kaede blackmails Jiro into having an affair with her, and demands that Jiro kill Lady Sué and marry her instead. Saburo's army crosses …show more content…
The whole story happened because of what Hidetori did earlier in his life. He killed Lady Kaede’s family and led to Kaede’s plan to kill him and destroy his family. It was also because of Hidetori’s cruelty and desire of power that two of his sons also became cruel to him when then try to take over Ichimonji clan. However, if Hidetori, Taro, Jiro and Kaede deserved to die because of what they did, Lady Sué and Saburo did not do anything to harm others and lead to their death. Sué forgave Hidetori of killing his family; Saburo was the only son who was loyal and kind to his father. Therefore, just like the last conversation between Kyoami and Tango, this film questioned the existence of gods, argue that gods can be mischievous and cruel, and lastly conveyed an idea that even if gods are not cruel, they are unable to save people’s life. Tango also said “Men prefer sorrow over joy... suffering over peace!” which indicated that it was the human’s choice to fight wars and die, so gods could not do anything to save
The belief of God in Equaino’s life has guided him to endure rough toils. The thought of God in his head dictates his actions and words. He never wanted to lie, and treated people as he would like to be treated.
only what you can see instead of having such an indifferent god be ‘responsible’ for all the tragic
The general thems is gods are not as good as they are supposed to be.
Most can agree that random evil and suffering, such as accidents, war, illness, crime, and many more, have the power to disrupt human happiness. Most would also agree that it is not the evil and suffering that affects one, as much as it is how one responds to the evil and suffering that occurs in one’s life. It is undeniable that suffering occurs to everyone in some shape or form, and while others may not believe that it is suffering, it all depends on one’s life. There are many examples a reader can draw from in recent and ancient literature that provides examples of other’s suffering and how they responded to those stimuli. This essay explores how the problem of evil is addressed by Greek tragedy and by Western monotheistic tradition.
Before the war years, Kabuo's father, Zenhichi made an illegal agreement with the victim's father, Carl Heine senior. It was an agreement to an eight-year “lease-to-own” contract. Money changed hands, land was promised and terms were set. Unfortunately, the war came and the Japanese Americans were sent away to internment camp. Nothing was quite the same at wars end. When the Miyamoto has returned to claim their land, they had found out that the victim’s mother, Etta, cheated them. She sold their seven acres of strawberry land to another farmer, because of lack of the last payment during their removal. This disreputable action she took, was caused by her racist thoughts that she had toward Japanese. This has been demonstrated out in her conversation with her husband, she said, “We’re not such paupers as to sell to Japs, are we? For new clothes? For a pouch of fancy pipe tobacco?” (Guterson 119). Because of her being racist, it had cost the land of the Miyamoto and raised tension between the two families and created a motive for Kabuo to commit murder to Etta’s son as for revenge and to release his anger.
The myths which prove the contradictory behavior of the gods, acting as both benefactors and tormentors of man, can readily be explained when viewed in light of the prime directive for man, to worship the gods and not “overstep,” and the ensuing “Deus ex Mahina” which served to coerce man to fulfill his destiny as evidenced by the myths: “Pandora,” “Arachne, and “Odysseus.” Humankind and it’s range of vision over the gods beauty and power portrayed them to be benefactors but unseemingly it depicted their affliction towards humans.
Tayo returns home when World War II ends in 1945. He feels alienated from his home and hardly desires to live any longer. He is constantly vomiting as a result of the war and his grandma finally decides to have him meet with a medicine man because the doctors and hospitals cannot seem to cure Tayo's illness. The traditional purpose of the men is to wash off evil, and in Tayo's case it is to rid him of the evil of killing in the war. Tayo goes to see a man named Betonie who conducts ceremonies and right away Betonie's love of the land is displayed, along with his disappointment in what has happened to the land.
There is so much evil in the world such as: murder, child mortality, torture, rape, assault and more. So how can there be an all loving God if these things are constantly happening? In this paper, I will be arguing that there is in fact no such thing as an all loving and all powerful God due to Evil. When I think of an all-loving God, I think of God as someone who would never allow a child to be kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed. I think of God as someone who would not allow anything bad or evil to happen in this world.
At first glance, it seems that the abhorrent destiny of the main character is at the mercy of mischievous and cruel gods.
Nothing can be more life changing than when a god chooses to interact with a mortal man. Much of Greek mythology describes the natures of these interactions. The Olympian Gods meddle with the mortals they rule over constantly, but what is the result for these interactions, and how do they impact the mortals? The question that this paper tries to address is what is the nature of these divine interaction, and how does each side truly perceive each other? The Gods and mortals interact in a variety of ways, but the true natures of these interactions truly describe how the ancient Greeks perceived their gods.
In both the plays the common theme that we can observe is that gods dont consider mortals important enough to either give them an important element that can make their lives easy, nor do they attach importance to a human life. The gods even amongst themselves have a complicated relationship. Their power has bounds amongst themselves but in the case of humans they exercise their power without any considerations or limitations.
I 'm both stories the gods help mortals, and don 't even attempt to destroy them unless they do something outrageous. In both stories morals disrespected a god, In The Metamorphoses, Arachne and Marsyas challenged gods to a weaving and musical contest. That was the part where the story talked about The Role Of Art. It was much more characteristic in this story because of all the themes than in The Odyssey. For example, Love makes all Gods and to Mortals alike because we all have a soft spot for it. Ovid demonstrates that love is dangerous because it has power over everyone. Nobody can avoid the affects of love, or the danger it brings. In my opinion you could avoid some effects of love by not loving to hard. People get hurt inside all the time and the more they get hurt the more they don 't feel when it comes to love. They start to stop showing emotion outside. That is just how it goes now a days. The god of death, PLuto is attracted to love. Love and happiness are the reasons why we as people live. Woman being impregnant is a common relationship in love. They instantly fall in love with their baby. Augustus made an attempt to create legal and illegal forms of love to regulate
Two weeks later, Fito and Yurico were found cold and hungry on the tracks in Irapuato. Affected by this they put an end to their journey to the north. They were placed in a shelter by Mexican Immigration to get deported. Out of the four kids, Kevin is only one who makes it to the United States. Detained in Huston, he feels he is trapped, “cornered and locked up.” He only gets to do only so many things, misses his mother and regrets everything that lead to him to coming to the United States. Eventually, Kevin is deported back to Honduras and meets his beloved mother. Even though, his mother is happy to see him, she admits that it would have been better for him if he could have founded a family in United States. His step father also thinks that Kevin is a problem and shouldn’t live with them. Nine months later Kevin and Fito made another attempt to reach the United States. Fito was caught and transferred back to Honduras and Kevin was caught at the United States border, then transferred to a shelter in Washington
If the idea of morality is abandoned, all actions become permissible. Yet the madman himself says that “there never was a greater event, and on account of it, all who are born after [it] belong to a higher history than any history hitherto!” This statement establishes that the madman actually sees the death of God as a benefit. It may seem unusual to describe the sudden and complete elimination of morality from society in a positive way. However, the attitude of the madman can be explained by a rhetorical question that he poses to the villagers. “Shall we not ourselves have to become Gods merely to seem worthy of [killing God]?” In essence, the madman believes that the death of God will make people directionless, but he also believes that people, out of necessity, will give themselves direction, and decide what is right and wrong for themselves.
...clansmen come to decide what they should do, Okonkwo has already chosen war. As the messenger arrives to order an end to the meeting, Okonkwo is once again driven by his rage and kills the messenger. He realizes that the others were not prepared to fight, and he comes to understand the consequences of his actions. Instead of being executed, Okonkwo decides to take his own life.