Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lilies of the field character analysis
Character analysis catch 22
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lilies of the field character analysis
Imagine a world where there was no color, no race, no religion, everyone was the same, everyone thinks the same. is sameness a good thing or bad thing. The book "The Giver" is about a boy named Jonas's who lives in a society where everything is the same and there is no freedom. Jonas is selected the receiver for the community. He learns experiencing different things is better than doing the same thing everyday. Although sameness has some good factors such as being safe and not feeling pain, sameness lacks emotions, personal expression and being able to make decisions.
First off, sameness lacks the qualities a human should have. Sameness means everyone is the same. No religion no emotion, no choices and no individuality.
The people in the community are told who to marry and what job they will have.
…show more content…
After Jonas's father kills the child, he says "bye bye little guy" as he drops him down the chute. This means he thinks he isn't doing anything wrong. My second example supports my topic sentence and thesis because the father doesn't feel any emotion as he kills the baby.
In conclusion, there is sadness and grieve, but there is love and joy that overcome the negative emotions. There is no receiver for us because we have our own memories and we make our own decisions and we make mistakes but we can prevent history from repeating itself. What this tells us is that we have more freedom from being individual and we can advance our minds to prevent past mistakes.
Although sameness has some good factors such as being safe and not feeling pain, sameness lacks emotions, personal expression and being able to make decisions. Difference is great because there is a variety of things you can do without getting controlled. Sameness is not good because people in Jonas's community can't make their own choices or express how they
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
In this world there are millions upon millions of people that roam around the earth in there own special, little life. Every person is different than the next one and he or she has their own personality. Each person also deals with life differently than the next. If everyone was the same, then we would be like one giant colony of ants. Just following the ant in front of us, and everyone looking the same as the next. Not having any of there own ideas or thoughts of what to do and how to do it.
There are many advantages in Jonas’s community for Sameness. One advantage is that no one get jealous, which stops a lot of arguments. If someone gets a choice of something with color which they don’t have, they could argue about a specific color. Also if someone gets a better grade than the person with bad the not good grade, the person with the good grade will get praised and the other one won't.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
In The Giver, a narrative by Lois Lowry, Jonas’s father illustrates his feelings during his Ceremony of Twelve and Jonas tells about his own feelings concerning the forthcoming event. In the text it states, “‘But to be honest, Jonas,’ his father said, ‘for me there was not the element of suspense that there is with your ceremony. Because I was already fairly certain of what my Assignment was to be,’”(Lowry, paragraph 3). This segment of text elucidates the reason of Jonas’s father’s lack of surprise of his Assignment. As stated above, Jonas’s father was already certain of his Assignment, which he continues to explain to be a Nurturer. Jonas’s father explains that as a result of the love he showed all the Newchildren and the time he spent at
He starts to believe that a world of sameness where no one can decide or make choices for themselves is boring. Lois Lowry is warning readers that living in a world of sameness is not something to create as it is boring and dull, but if the world follows conformity and does not value diversity and difference enough, society could become that of Jonas’s. When he turns twelve, his job for the rest of his life is decided as the Receiver. His job is to receive all the memories the previous Receiver has held on to. While this is beneficial for Jonas as he is able to leave the society and his job of the Receiver behind and get freedom, the community is left without someone to take the memories from The Giver.
The apple in The Giver symbolizes change. In Jonas’s visions he “had noticed, following the path of the apple through the air with this eyes, that the piece of fruit had-well, this was the part he couldn't adequately understand - the apple had changed. Just for an instant.” (21-22) This shows Jonas has the power to see beyond, he is experiencing the color red. Change may happen even by accident but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad. Such as in this case where changing continuously allowed Jonas to help others constantly by taking the burden of all the pain in the world because of a mistake in genetic engineering. As you can tell sameness, precision, and indistinguishable people doesn’t mean perfection. Change is necessary to allow everyone a chance to grow, to experience, to grow as a person and in their jobs, to be unique, and different. That way
When jonas experienced twisting his leg from a memory, Jonas felt alone. No one knew what pain was, except for himself and his trainer. “They have never known pain, he thought. The realization made him feel desperately lonely.” (139). Jonas being the main character, is chosen to be the receiver. The receiver of the community, has the ability to see beyond. According to the
When Lois Lowry first introduces Jonas and the world in which he lives, Jonas is oblivious to the underlying deception behind everyday acts. The plot is driven by Jonas’s newfound knowledge on the lies the government is founded upon. As the plot progresses, Lois Lowry uses also the act and concept of Release as a guiding factor in conveying her theme. As Jonas is introduced to war and pain, he also watches a Release, something has been taught to see simply as an aspect of life, however it is revealed to be murder, disposal of the elderly, treatment for unhealthy infants, and even a punishment. Jonas watches his father as he “pushed the plunger very slowly, injecting the liquid into the scalp vein until it is empty.”(149) In the following moments Jonas realizes “he killed it! My father killed it.” Previously Jonas’s father had spoken on Release, saying he got “the smaller one(child) all cleaned up and comfy… then I wave bye-bye.”(137) The fact that Jonas and his father both knew the truth, despite what had been hidden from the public eye, is a key aspect in Lois Lowry’s portrayal of theme. An additional instance in which Lowry uses sequence event to convey her theme to the reader, is the contrast between the game war, that Jonas’s friend Asher plays and the war of reality. Children in Jonas’s community play war, as children now play tag, what they believe to be a harmless and exciting playground, is something Jonas later finds to be resembling of actual violence, and is appalled by the game’s popularity. Those who participate in the child’s game war, are oblivious to any deeper meaning, as the truth has been masked, however, once again, the Receiver holds memories of war beyond their shielded society. On the whole, Lois Lowry’s use of sequence of events in the depiction of her theme is extremely
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
In The Giver, by Lois Lowry, the reader is left with an uncertain ending about what happens to the main character of the story, Jonas, and his little friend, Gabriel. The plot of a story usually ends with a resolution, where the conflict of the story is resolved; however, this is clearly not the case with The Giver. It is not possible to be completely certain on the ending of this book by reading this story alone; however, it is possible to gather the evidence and assume what likely occurred in the ending of The Giver. One cannot be sure on what happened at the ending of The Giver; however, I believe that Jonas and Gabriel did not survive. I also believe that there could have been a more effective ending to the story; I highly disagree with Lois Lowry’s choice of leaving it up to the reader to decide what happens in the ending of the story, for it leaves too many unanswered questions. Overall, I did not enjoy the ending of The Giver due to its ambiguity.
Jonas misses the way it was before he had memories where there was no pain or feeling, because everything was innocent. But he understands that although there was innocence nobody feels true happiness.Jonas thinks: “But he knew he couldn’t go back to that world of no feelings that he had lived in so long” (Lowry 131). Jonas wishes he could go back when everything was innocent and when he had no burden of pain, but although there was innocence the bad memories were stripped away to avoid the feeling of pain but also leaves everyone emotionless. But he knows it can never be the same again because of all the knowledge he gained from memories. He learns that memoires need to be valued, even the painful ones. Jonas feels that his community can change and things could be different. He thinks they should live in a world with memories. Jonas says: “Things could be different. I don’t know how, but there must be some way for things to be different. There could be colours [...] and everybody would have memories [...] There could be love” (Lowry 128). Jonas wishes that they could all have memories because everyone would be able to experience love. Love is one of the most important things in human life. He knows that there are bad memories, but without them, he wouldn’t be able to enjoy the good ones. Eventually, with his feelings
...s us to celebrate our differences. We also realise that we live with the same kind of memories that Jonas struggles to carry, every day of our lives. Although the fact that the memories are new to him makes it harder for Jonas to bear the pain, it also makes it easier for him to appreciate the beauty of the little things. We, on the other hand, being familiar with the sensations, do not cherish them as much as we should. None of us savors the warmth of sunshine or the beauty of snow the way Jonas does. Perhaps we need the darkness of the night to appreciate the brightness of the moon.
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”
The purpose of this book was to show us a possible version of a "Utopia".