Samaritan Law Case

207 Words1 Page

First off, wow, just wow. I'm very unsure of how to react to this situation. The Samaritan law states if you see someone in trouble, you help. A person can be liable if they ignore someone in danger, understandable. This, however, opens a can of worms I can't wrap my brain around. On one hand, Van Horn did crash into a light pole and then caused permanent spinal to this woman, but she was just trying to help. Van Horn is not a medical professional and was just responding the best way they could have. I feel sympathy for Ms.Torti and what happened to her, but I wish this case was not continuing. This is a tragedy and it just sad on both sides. If this explosion did happen like Van Horn feared, then I would understand the legal action. It really

Show More
Related

  • Patient Autonomy Case Study

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the morning of May 17th, 2005, Nola Walker was involved in a two-car collision. Police and Ambulance were dispatched and arrive on scene at the intersection of Kenny and Fernley Street. Ambulance conducted various assessments on Ms. Walker which revealed no major injuries and normal vital signs. Mrs walker denied further medical investigation and denied hospital treatment. Later on, Queensland police conducted a roadside breath test that returned a positive reading, police then escorted Ms. Walker to the cairns police station. Ms. Walker was found to be unconscious, without a pulse and not breathing. An ambulance was called but attempts to revive her failed (Coroner’s Inquest, Walker 2007). The standard of Legal and ethical obligation appeared by paramedics required for this situation are flawed and require further examination to conclude whether commitments of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice were accomplished.

    Read More

  • Mendez V Westminster Case Study

    1093 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the late 1940’s and early 1950’s there were many issues that involved racial segregation with many different communities. A lot of people did not took a stand for these issues until they were addressed by other racial groups. Mendez vs Westminster and Brown vs The Board of Education, were related cases that had to take a stand to make a change. These two cases helped many people with different races to come together and be able to go to school even if a person was different than the rest.

    Read More

  • Thomson's Arguments And Summary

    1187 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the above argument regarding the Kitty Genovese case, the problem is that the Good Samaritan in the story was not placing himself in harm’s way, so who is to say simply calling the police would have been an act of a Good Samaritan, and intervening would have been Splendid Samaritans. It seems she is simply trying to argue an artificial distinction between types of Samaritans.

    Read More

  • People V Smith Case Analysis

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to highlight all aspects of People v. Smith, 470 NW2d 70, Michigan Supreme Court (1991) we must first discuss the initial findings of the Michigan Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals decision was based on the precedence of two similar court cases that created discussion concerning the admission of juvenile records into adult trials. Following the Court of Appeals, the Michigan Supreme Court entered the final decision on Ricky Smith’s motion for resentencing. The Michigan Supreme Court also conducted a thorough examination of People v. Jones, People v. McFarlin, and People v. Price to determine the outcome of Smith’s motion to be resentenced.

    Read More

  • Health Care Case Study

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    Health Care workers are constantly faced with legal and ethical issues every day during the course of their work. It is important that the health care workers have a clear understanding of these legal and ethical issues that they will face (1). In the case study analysed key legal and ethical issues arise during the initial decision-making of the incident, when the second ambulance crew arrived, throughout the treatment and during the transfer of patient to the hospital. The ethical issues in this case can be described as what the paramedic believes is the right thing to do for the patient and the legal issues control what the law describes that the paramedic should do in this situation (2, 3). It is therefore important that paramedics also

    Read More

  • The Samaritan's Dilemma Summary

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    For this book report on The Samaritans Dilemma by Deborah Stone will consist of two chapters I am going to talk about chapters 2,4. I will talk about what Stone was trying to say in the chapters and either if I will agree or disagree with what she has to say or if I can actually be in the middle of the argument and be for it as well as against it. I will as well be providing information from the book The American Welfare State by Brian Glenn to show why I favor a side in the dilemma Stone is talking about. Seven Bad Arguments Against Help In chapter two Stone tries to cover objections that people have against the welfare state. In the first argument she goes on and talks about that by helping people it makes them more dependent on other people

    Read More

  • My Mommys Been In A Car Accident

    1646 Words  | 4 Pages

    At Ten P.m on September 23, 2006, my mother Kelli Elizabeth Dicks was hit by a car on Route 146 southbound trying to cross the high speed lane. She was being picked up by a friend. Instead of taking the exit and coming to the other side of the highway, her ride suggested she run across the street. The impact of the car caused her to be thrown 87 feet away from the original impact zone and land in a grassy patch of land, her shoes stayed where she was hit. She was immediately rushed to Rhode Island Hospital where she was treated for serious injuries. When she arrived at the hospital she was rushed into the operating room for an emergency surgery. The amount of injuries she sustained were unbelievable. She broke 18 different bones, lacerated her liver and her spleen, ruptured her bladder, and she collapsed both lungs. When she went in for her emergency operation, and had her

    Read More

  • Self Sacrifice In The Kite Runner

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ed a man being mauled by dogs, risked his safety to insure the safety of the victim. This scenario bears a similarity to that within the “Parable of the Good Samaritan.” The mission behind the parable is to instill in common people, the desire to help those in need. If related to modern times, one can compare this thought process to the good samaritans of the 9/11 world trade center attack. Many firemen and police officials rushed into the collapsing buildings in order to save anyone they could find. In doing so, many of those samaritans lost their lives, but many more lives were saved by their selfless actions. Had it not been for those rescuers, many more lives would have been lost. In everyday life, we will come across a situations where tough choices will be made. In this case, we need to “take a moral high road” and choose to help and not be a bystander.

    Read More

  • Sports Car Accident

    1537 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... addition waiting to punish the officer if the police department chose to do so would be the best course of action because if they do it before the cases are dismissed they may give the lawsuits merit to go to court. This would waste a lot of money and the officer and police department would be win but they could avoid wasting time and money by just delaying the decision on the punishment until after the lawsuits has been taken care of. Legally the officer and police station are not liable but ethically and morally they have a duty and responsibility to help both families in anyway they can without incriminating themselves. The final recommendation would be to get the lawsuits and legal liable dismissed with the Statute mentioned previously and then using good morals and ethics help both families and the officer in any way that can after this traumatic incident.

    Read More

  • Wrongfully Accused: A Lethal Mistake

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...eemed so real. In conclusion the Texas government should have done a better job during this investigation and figured out it was an accident before an innocent man was executed.

    Read More

  • The Samaritan Arguments Analysis

    1468 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hares takes on a Kantian Approach; a duty. He uses a concept that a fetus is not a “person” because it does not have the rights. He says that the characteristic and a duty to have a right are considered as “human beings”. Hare says that we don’t know whether the fetus would turn into a human adult or a horse (Luper and Brown, p. 585). He presents two principles: Pro-life and Pro-choice; life and liberty. If mothers terminate a pregnancy, then she is offending the principle of preserving life, and if a third-party stops the mother from an abortion, then they are defending against the mother’s pro-life and pro-choice decisions (Luper and Brown, p. 586). . The fetus should be considered as an “it” rather than a “person” However, Hares says that

    Read More

  • Barristers And Barister Ethical Dilemmas

    1947 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since 15th century, barristers have been split up into two professions in United Kingdom, Barristers and Barristers. Barristers have traditionally been the people who research cases, deal with clients directly, and Barristers have had the rights of advocate in courts. Hence, Barristers' ethical duties are very important to the court and the client, and this is an essay to discuss the duties to the court, clients and conflicts in between.

    Read More

  • Liability for Omissions in Tort Law

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a strict distinction between acts and omissions in tort of negligence. “A person is often not bound to take positive action unless they have agreed to do so, and have been paid for doing so.” (Cane.2009; 73) The rule is a settled one and allows some exceptions only in extreme circumstances. The core idea can be summarized in “why pick on me” argument. This attitude was spectacularly demonstrated in a notoriously known psychological experiment “The Bystander effect” (Latané & Darley. 1968; 377-383). Through practical scenarios, psychologists have found that bystanders are more reluctant to intervene in emergency situations as the size of the group increases. Such acts of omission are hardly justifiable in moral sense, but find some legal support. “A man is entitled to be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to them.” (L Esher Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 Q.B. 497) Definitely, when there is no sufficient proximity between the parties, a legal duty to take care cannot be lawfully exonerated and imposed, as illustrated in Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] All ER (D) 722). If it could, individuals would have been in the permanent state of over- responsibility for others, neglecting their own needs. Policy considerations in omission cases are not inspired by the parable of Good Samaritan ideas. Judges do favour individualism as it “permits the avoidance of vulnerability and requires self-sufficiency. “ (Hoffmaster.2006; 36)

    Read More

  • Should People Be Held Accountable

    440 Words  | 1 Pages

    It doesn’t matter if they got in a bad accident by choice or by bad luck, everyone deserves to be saved. When a natural disaster occurs you have no way of preventing it, especially if you don’t know what the severity of the disaster will be. “Even as climate change increases the risk of natural disaster, cities can be made increasingly safe, as long as public policy makers carefully prepare”(Kim par.4). It doesn’t matter how much you prepare, there is always someone that will get hurt or something goes wrong. When something does go wrong, it is not your fault and you shouldn’t have to be held accountable for the issue. You would not want to pay for the issue that happened and neither do they. People shouldn’t be held accountable and pay with money or guilt for theirs or anyone else's

    Read More

  • The English Law on Vicarious Liability

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    The English Law on Vicarious Liability An employer is responsible for damage caused by the torts of his employees acting in the course of employment. This is known as ‘vicarious liability’[1]. Essentially, vicarious liability is where the employer is generally substituted in terms of liability for the employee, the employee also has liability but the resources of the employer such as insurance makes them more financially attractive to the claimant. The mechanism of vicarious liability is arguably the best compromise between the needs of tort victims and the freedom of businesses as the employer usually has insurance to cover the tort of the employee, making it more financially viable to the employer than directly compensating the claimant.

    Read More

More about Samaritan Law Case

Open Document