Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thomas aquinas essays
The existence of God has been a paramount question people have thoroughly sought the answer to for centuries. In Saint Thomas Aquinas’s writing “Whether God Exists”, Aquinas theorizes that even with the presence of human reasoning and evil on earth, logical verifications to Gods’ existence is evident. Saint Aquinas begins to demonstrate his thesis by describing two main objectives to Gods being. The first objective to God points out the contradictory notion of having a God that represents infinite goodness, while still having a world full of evil. In the second objective, Saint Aquinas describes the argument that a few set principles can explain everything on earth. For instance, all things that are natural occurrences come down to the single principle, nature. Another principle, human will, is used to explain all …show more content…
With these objectives in mind, Saint Thomas Aquinas then goes on to reveal his “five way” the indicates Gods being.
Saint Aquinas begins by examining the rule of motion. He explains has everything has to have a starting force to move from a potential to actuality. In other words, things in the world couldn’t have begun, or be put in motion, unless there was an initial mover. This initial mover is God. His next point analyzes efficient causation. With Efficient Causation it is necessary to have a cause in order to have an effect. All efficient cause must start with the cause of the intermediate cause, then the intermediate cause transitions to the ultimate cause. Without the first cause, then no intermediate or ultimate cause can be produced. God is believed to that first efficient cause. His third point interprets the idea of possibility and necessity. There are many examples in nature in which things have existed and now no longer do. In order for natural things to exist, something else must have existed beforehand. Otherwise, since all things can cease to exist, then at one point
Rene Descartes’ third meditation from his book Meditations on First Philosophy, examines Descartes’ arguments for the existence of God. The purpose of this essay will be to explore Descartes’ reasoning and proofs of God’s existence. In the third meditation, Descartes states two arguments attempting to prove God’s existence, the Trademark argument and the traditional Cosmological argument. Although his arguments are strong and relatively truthful, they do no prove the existence of God.
8- McDermid, Douglas. "God's Existence." PHIL 1000H-B Lecture 9. Trent University, Peterborough. 21 Nov. 2013. Lecture.
The question of God’s existence has been debated through the history of man, with every philosopher from Socrates to Immanuel Kant weighing in on the debate. So great has this topic become that numerous proofs have been invented and utilized to prove or disprove God’s existence. Yet no answer still has been reached, leaving me to wonder if any answer at all is possible. So I will try in this paper to see if it is possible to philosophically prove God’s existence.
Aquinas’ third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.
Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts.
St. Thomas Aquinas presents five arguments to demonstrate the existence of God. However, this paper focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is regarded as the Teleological Argument and states that things that lack intelligence act for some end or purpose. While the fifth argument satisfies God’s existence for Aquinas, some contemporary readers would argue that Aquinas neglects the laws of physics. Others argue that Aquinas allows a loophole in his argument so that the Catholic conception of God is not the only intelligent designer.
In this paper, I will explain how Descartes uses the existence of himself to prove the existence of God. The “idea of God is in my mind” is based on “I think, therefore I am”, so there is a question arises: “do I derive my existence? Why, from myself, or from my parents, or from whatever other things there are that are less perfect than God. For nothing more perfect than God, or even as perfect as God, can be thought or imagined.” (Descartes 32, 48) Descartes investigates his reasons to show that he, his parents and other causes cannot cause the existence of himself.
There are often many mixed views when discussing God’s existence. In Anselm’s works “The Proslogion” and “Anselm’s Reply to Gaunilo” and Gaunilo’s work the “Reply on Behalf of the Fool”, both of their philosophies on the matter are imparted. Anselm’s logic regarding God is correct as he sustains his argument even when it confronted with criticisms and it is comprehensible.
If God did not exist, he would not be the greatest being imaginable. He is the greatest thing imaginable. Therefore, he does exist. From this argument, God’s existence is viewed. as necessary (Ayer. A. J. 1973).
In the Third Meditation, Descartes forms a proof for the existence of God. He begins by laying down a foundation for what he claims to know and then offers an explanation for why he previously accepted various ideas but is no longer certain of them. Before he arrives at the concept of God, Descartes categorizes ideas and the possible sources that they originate from. He then distinguishes between the varying degrees of reality that an idea can possess, as well as the cause of an idea. Descartes proceeds to investigate the idea of an infinite being, or God, and how he came to acquire such an idea with more objective reality than he himself has. By ruling out the possibility of this idea being invented or adventitious, Descartes concludes that the idea must be innate. Therefore, God necessarily exists and is responsible for his perception of a thing beyond a finite being.
He continues by saying that for any change to occur there must have been a previous cause that existed in reality and if one was to trace this line of causes and effects all the way back there must be a first cause that began the chain. But there cannot be anything worldly like that because anything natural must have an impetus already in reality to transform it from potentiality to reality. The only explanation, in Aquinas' e... ... middle of paper ... ... s a cause except God.
He concludes he did not create the idea of God. A finite being is incapable of creating an idea of an infinite possibility. Therefore, God must have created the idea already in him when he was created. Concluding that God exists. He also touches upon the idea in which he resolves that it cannot be a deceiver.
In the article, This is why we are here” the author, John Piper, states, “ …whats true for you is your God, and whats true for me is my God –whatever works is fine”. Basically what Piper is saying, whatever religion you are it does not matter as longest you believe there is a God. According to this statement, I can truly agree there is a God, and regardless of my own opinion, others in society today can also agree it does not matter how you chose to see God, as longest you know God Does Exist. With this being said in the article, “Does God Exist” the author Aquinas begins with two people explaining why they believe God Does not exist. In response to the question Aquinas begins to prove them wrong by giving us five ways in which God Does Exist Such as: God is the cause of change, God is the cause and effect in change, exist to nonexistence, ultimate good, and finally intelligence designs. However the main ones that stands out is the third reason the existence to the nonexistence, and fourth the ultimate good, without these two main points no one would believe God did not exist today...
Instinctually, humans know that there is a greater power in the universe. However, there are a few who doubt such instinct, citing that logically we cannot prove such an existence. St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, wrote of five proofs for the existence of God. The Summa Theologica deals with pure concepts; these proofs rely on the world of experience - what one can see around themselves. In these proofs, God will logically be proven to exist through reason, despite the refutes against them.
Therefore, one could assume that God is perfect, and that His perfection allows Him to be more pure and have more power to act. If God is perfect as is implied, that in which His perfection is used, the more powerful He will be and actually is. Thus, creating the possibility that God is omnipotent. Then Aquinas explains because God