Russia in World War One

2479 Words5 Pages

Russia in World War One

Against a domestic background of widespread strikes and violent

government assaults on strikers, Russia entered WWI in August, 1914.

with the world's largest army. Poorly trained and equipped, they

quickly went from early success to catastrophic defeat. The disastrous

fortunes of the Russian army undermined the authority of the

government. There were conscription (draft) riots in the cities. There

were food shortages. Russia lost territory. People who did not oppose

the war because of political sentiments opposed it because they saw it

as a disaster for the Russian people. By the end of 1916, the Russians

had lost more than a million men and continued to lose major battles.

Nicholas II removed his second cousin as supreme commander of the army

and took control himself in late 1915. Things went no better for the

Tsar, however. He was held responsible for the ongoing defeats and

lost what popular support he had. In March, 1917, he abdicated as

Tsar, and a new provisional government was formed.

When the new minister of war (Kerensky) announced a major offensive,

the response was negative among both the civilian and military

populations. The Bolsheviks encouraged large demonstrations at home,

and soldier refused to fight. It is estimated that there were some 2

million desertions from the Russian army by late 1917.

Many of those who deserted took their weapons and their training home

and seized land from the nobles. The new government was powerless to

stop the turmoil. Dissension within the new government resulted in the

newly-installed and then newly-fired supreme commander's (Kornilov)

sending troops t...

... middle of paper ...

...urvive with widespread support from the population of a

country. It is of no surprise that the Bolsheviks seized upon the

popular discontent with the system and took over in October.

Dual power, it can be said, is not an accurate description of the

state of Russian politics between February and October 1917. It is not

accurate because the two halves of the dual system were moving ever

closer, first with the appointment of Kerensky and the other socialist

ministers and then with the actions of the Soviets, supporting the

Provisional government during the July days. It was the distance

between the system of dual power and the people that it was meant

represent which showed the true duality of the system, not the

traditional view of dual power split between the bourgeois Provisional

government and the socialist Soviets.

Open Document