Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frankenstein's monster is a victim
Frankenstein's monster is a victim
Cultural aspect of child development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Frankenstein's monster is a victim
The way a child is raised and the parts of the world they are exposed to greatly influences the type of person they will become. Although individuals may be born with certain qualities and intuitions that come directly from nature, in reality, most people’s experiences and knowledge they gain from the care given to them by their parents plays a bigger role in the development of that person. A child’s experiences, whether they be positive or negative play major factors in their development. This is seen through the creation of the monster in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. The monster’s nature and nurture develop him into who he is and his guardian figure is influential on him. Jean-Jacques Rousseau expresses his beliefs that a child’s …show more content…
They do not agree with the statement that their upbringing is extremely influential on the person they become. Some philosophers believe that “Our efforts may bring us within sight of the goal, but fortune must favour us if we are to reach it” (Doyle). In this case, ‘fortune’ is referring to the natural instincts a child is born with, the counter believes that although experiences and outside influence may influence a child’s development partially, they do not believe that it carries much prominence. In Rousseau’s book Emile, he describes two young children who are born with essentially all of the same characteristics which later evolve based on their surroundings and upbringings. He states, “The ideal environment for the child is one in which the natural self could be encouraged and supported without adult influence and social obligation” (Vadeboncoeur). If it was a perfect world, outside influences would have no impact on a person’s actions. However, Rousseau goes on to explain that this is not the reality, Cultural expectations, parental guidance, and societal cues all shape a child’s mind during their development. Personally I have experienced growing up in a home with parents that encourage both work ethic and success. This has definitely influenced me in my decisions to work towards going to college and one day finding a successful …show more content…
When Victor creates the monster, he obviously has qualities that he had immediately upon his creation. For instance, Victor was terrified of the monster as soon as he saw him solely do to the way he looked and acted. (Shelley 48). The impending catastrophes of the monsters can likely be due to the fact that the person he viewed as his guardian, Victor, abandoned him. The monster felt a connection with Victor, so his violent actions are a result of his resentfulness towards him being left alone. This connection can be made to Rousseau’s theory on development because the monster has qualities similar to that of a human being. He feels the effects of being abandoned and realizes that to be happy he should acquire a companion. After observing a family for a while, he was able to request that Victor create him a female monster. (Shelley 126). This shows his desire to have experiences with other people, these experiences would be what shapes him into who he is. Although he never quite got his mate from Victor, he still felt a deep connection with Victor. So, when he finds out he has died, he feels he no longer has a purpose to survive. He pays his respect and then vows to kill himself. (Shelley 169). Victor is responsible for the upbringing of the monster, similar to the way parents raise their children and impact their life paths. So, it is understandable that the monster would
As a romantic, archetype and gothic novel, Victor is responsible for the monsters actions because Victor abandons his creation meaning the creature is dejected and ends up hideous and fiendish. It is unfair to create someone into this world and then just abandon it and not teach it how to survive. The quote from the creature “Why did you make such a hideous creature like me just to leave me in disgust” demonstrates how much agony the creature is in. He is neglected because of his creator. The monster says “The hateful day when I received life! I accurse my creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?” Victor is wholly at fault for his actions, image and evil.
In a world full of novelty, guidance is essential to whether a being’s character progresses positively or negatively in society. Parents have a fundamental role in the development of their children. A parent’s devotion or negligence towards their child will foster a feeling of trust or mistrust in the latter. This feeling of mistrust due to the lack of guidance from a parental figure is represented in the relationship between Victor Frankenstein and his creation in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein. The creature created by Frankenstein was shown hatred and disgust from the very beginning, which led to its indignant feelings toward his creator and his kind.
With nobody to reason with, Victor makes senseless decisions while he is alone. Victor begins this with his process of creating the monster. Nobody in the right mind would ever dig up graves, but that is just what victor goes and does. Once this creation is finally given life, which Victor has spent two years striving for, Victor foolishly abandons it. Victor comes to his senses to some degree after he brings life to the monster as he states, “‘now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream had vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 43). Had there been companions around Victor during this creation time, perhaps someone would have been able to guide Victor away from creating the “wretch” (Shelley 43) he so hopelessly conceived. As for the monster, he makes fairly good decisions even without guidance from anyone, including Victor, his creator. The monster has the desire to learn and gain knowledge as a genuine individual. As the monster is continuously rejected and shunned by mankind, his natural benevolence turns to malevolence. In his loneliness, the monster wrongly decides to declare “‘everlasting war against the species, and more than all, against him who had formed me and sent me forth to this insupportable misery’” (Shelley 126). Say the monster was able to have comrades of some kind around him, he would not have turned to this
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
Victor experiences very little joy at all after the creation of the monster. He suffers from numerous bouts of depression, he most tolerate the deaths of his brother, best friend, and wife, all of which were murdered at the hands of the monster. His friend Justine is executed because of the death of William, for which she is falsely accused and convicted. His father also dies after the murder of Elizabeth, Victor's ill-fated bride. With so much death surrounding his life, how is it possible that Victor could still be cognizant of his actions when he decides to pursue the monster and end its violent fury? He can't. Victor's mind is so clouded by the sorrow and pain of his past that he is blinded to the fact that he is attempting to destroy a creature with far greater physical strength and speed than any mortal. Much of his conflict appears to be created by the monster, when in fact the torment comes from Victor's own hands because he himself created and gave life to the monster.
If Victor had stayed around and showed the monster the real world, he might have not have went on to perform violent actions. This portrays Victor as a selfish character and gives more of an insight on his personal life. As a child, Victor is only interested in furthering his own knowledge and not worried about anyone else. He spent much of his time “drawing the picture of [his] early days... when [he] would account to [himself] for the birth of that passion which afterwards ruled [his] destiny” (Shelley 34), or otherwise a magnificent creation that would change his future. When constructing the Monster, he put all of his relatives in the back of his mind, and only focused on his own success and victory. This further explains the theme of being selfless and only doing certain things that will benefit
...ime, such as reading, speaking, and how to find shelter. More importantly however, he learns something that affects his entirety of his short life: how humans truly are. Frankenstein learns that humans can be kind and moral, but more often are cruel, brutish, unfair, and unsympathetic. He learns that he will never be accepted, and learning this drives him to do rather evil human-ish acts. Even as he does these bad things though, he still experiences regret, longing for companionship, and the drive to do good things and be a good person. This inner conflict is present in all humans, as we struggle to do the right thing and avoid temptations and violence. This struggle is what causes the creature to truly be human, encompassing all of humanity’s aspects, including both the good and bad.
...der that the novel’s outcome is inevitable. The deaths of both Victor and the monster signify what dangerous knowledge can do to one. Somewhere along the way Victor failed to remember that he must care for what he creates, similar to the way nature looks after its creations. Excessive knowledge may prove to be destructive when not used properly. The monster was deemed to be inhumane and cruel, but Victor was his creator; therefore, Victor is just as inhumane and cruel as the monster. Victor had enough knowledge to create the monster, but he did not have enough knowledge to understand the monster. Victor’s creation is was not a monster when it was created, he had the potential to be something extraordinary. While dangerous knowledge may be destructive, limited knowledge can be even more lethal. The omniscient Victor failed to realize that the monster had a heart.
The monster is left to live his life with no help from his creator after being abandoned. While having the mind of a newborn, this is not easy for him. By not knowing right from wrong, he murdered Victor's loved ones in order to get attention. He never had anyone to teach him how to live life with dignity and respect. This is a major loss for a living being. The creator is at fault here because the monster does not know better. Victor should have taken responsibility by accepting, raising, and controlling the monster.
The tabula rasa or blank slate theory is one of the most well-known in the realm of psychology concerning the development of the human mind. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a novel about a mad scientist and his attempt at creating human life, seems to draw inspiration from this concept as well as its proponent, Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau and his theories help to develop Shelley’s novel through the background of Rousseau’s own life, the development of Victor’s character, and the development of the Creature.
The monster wanted revenge only to satisfy his needs and to get even with his creator Victor. The only way the two would avoid any other conflicts that would have come their direction would be to eliminate and face the reality of their own catastrophe. Victor wanted to kill the monster because he killed and destroyed many things that he loved; however, the monster was the image of his own guilt and mind. The monster wanted closure and wanted to know why he was brought to the world only to be abandoned, lonely, and
The book 'Emile", Writes by Rousseau in 1762 is an important text behind Frankenstein as it helped to form some of the fundamental ideas that frankenstien follows. Its a novel in which a tutor educates a young orphan, guiding him through an 'ideal' education according to nature. Then as an adult he is considered an ideal citizen due to his close association with his
Victor has a lack of respect for the natural world that leads him on the path to becoming a monster. In creating the monster Victor is trying to change the natural world. He is trying to play the role of god by creating life.
Fated to be shunned and hated for his monstrous appearance, the monster is an embodiment of the things that Victor would go through if his actions and true intentions were known. Alongside of this, all of the pain and evil that came from the monster ultimately stemmed from a lack of attention and affection from Victor. Like a very high-stakes version of a child trying to get the attention of the parent, most if not all of the deaths and pain in the course of the plot could have been prevented if Victor was willing to follow through with the responsibility of his