Ross Douthat Rhetorical Analysis

410 Words1 Page

The general argument made by Ross Douthat in his work is that the withdrawal of standardized testing for college admissions could end meritocracy in higher education. More specifically, he argues that more than eighty percent of four-year colleges are not requiring the SAT or ACT scores, Douthat asserts that the transformation of universities from finishing schools for the wealthy into meritocracies was driven by the SAT and ACT. He writes that lower-class students might have depended on the standardized tests to get a boost out of their lousy school or to prove themselves, but now, without the standardized tests, they lack the support they need. In this passage, the author suggests that upper-class students are beneficiaries of the decline in the SAT, while …show more content…

The author uses rhetorical strategies such as pathos and compare-and-contrast to discuss the conflicts of eliminating standardized testing in most four-year university applications. Ross Douthat utilizes pathos to evoke emotional responses to the image of social inequality by emphasizing the experience of low-income students. The author discussed that higher-class students benefit from declining standardized testing, but lower-income students who are “trying to climb could lose a crucial ladder” (Douthat 5). This invokes a sense of sympathy by imagining a student not being able to get into the university they want just because they are not wealthy. He uses pathos so the reader can have an emotional response to the struggle of lower-income students who will lose an advantage they might have had. Ross Douthat also uses compare-and-contrast to highlight different viewpoints on the role of standardized testing in admissions. The author references the standard views of meritocracy skeptics and critics of the

Open Document