Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in Romeo and Juliet
Gender roles in Romeo and Juliet
Gender roles in Romeo and Juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in Romeo and Juliet
Attending “An Evening of Culture” at the Blue Valley Northwest Theatre was a very enjoyable experience. I was very entertained by the unique and comedic spin placed on the classic tragedy Romeo & Juliet. While watching the performance, I noticed many similarities and differences to the original play. The changes they incorporated changed the story line just enough to create a more amusing perspective.
One of the changes they made was the performance of about seven shortened scenes instead of the actual 24. This caused the play to be more of a summary rather than the entire story. After the prologue, the play jumped right into a scene where Romeo is speaking to his cousin. In the actual play of Romeo and Juliet, there is an explanation of the
…show more content…
back-story and more about Juliet. This change created some confusion along with the fact that the two actors playing Romeo and the cousin did not speak very clearly. This caused the audience to not hear much of the conversation except when they said “in love” a bunch of times. After this, they went straight to the party scene where Romeo sees Juliet. There is no fight between Tybalt and Romeo, but his cousin drags him out as if in danger. As the play continues, the loss of many important scenes causes confusion and humor, as no one can really understand what is being said. While watching, I had to rely more on what I knew about the story because the version performed was just very confusing. Another difference I noticed while watching the play was when they said that the play was by Bill Shakespeare, or something similar to that, instead of William Shakespeare. I thought this was pretty funny as it sort of explained to the audience beforehand that the play about to be performed was to not be taken seriously, and that they will be putting their own humorous twist on it. During the last scene, I found many funny differences, one of which being what happened between Romeo and his cousin. Although I do not know what happened in the actual play, I still know that what happened in the performance was not even close to accurate. As Romeo’s cousin confesses to Juliet how he feels about her, Romeo hears and starts a fight with him. They fight back and forth with their swords until they decided to fight each other with light sabers. I have a feeling that this did not happen in the real play from way back when. When Romeo finally kills his cousin, he yells in his face “I AM YOUR FATHER,” which also probably did not happen in the actual play. Another difference in the final scene was Romeo and Juliet’s deaths.
The poison Juliet took was just to make it look like she was dead because she would wake up later, but when Romeo took the same poison he actually died. Even though Romeo was supposed to be dead in this version, the actor started to fall asleep and began snoring which caused a lot of laughter, as it did not make much sense. Juliet then woke up later finding Romeo dead, so she stabbed herself in the chest. In the actual play, Romeo gets his own poison to kill himself when he thinks Juliet is dead. I thought this was hilarious because it did not make any sense at all. In actuality, the whole final scene did not …show more content…
make sense at all.
That is why at the end of the performance no one in the audience got up because no one thought that the play had reached the end yet. The students that were helping with the play had to tell us that the performance was over and we could leave.
Probably one of the biggest differences that no one could miss was Juliet’s mother. In the performance she was African American, which I thought was pretty funny. Although this is a time of equality and all, it does not make sense for a rich family to have an African American as the mother even if it is just a play. Every time she spoke I forgot that she was Lady Capulet because she was not what I pictured. It was also very funny when she and the nurse found Juliet dead and started to cry for a few seconds then acted all normal and just left her there.
Overall I thought that the play was very entertaining and I do not regret going. It was a fun addition to my night and it helped me see Romeo and Juliet in a different light.
See that rhyming I just did, it looks like I am on my way to becoming a professional poet just like Bill
Shakespeare.
My least favorite aspect of this play was the ending. The ending confused me and was anticlimactic. It was not funny and not entertaining at all.
In this essay I have talked about the devices that are used to raise your expectations even though some of them are false. Romeo and Juliet has many things that an audience can detect to know what they can expect from the rest of the play. I think that to be able to detect these things it can heavily depend on the audience. There are many things that Shakespeare’s audiences would have noticed because they understood the language. Contemporary audiences would have noticed certain things because of what they saw such as how the characters behave.
However, the largest thing changed was the fate. In the end, when Romeo was about to die, Juliet wakes up but doesn’t have time to stop Romeo from taking the poison; whereas the King production, Romeo dies before Juliet wakes up. The purpose of Juliet to wake up before Romeo dies is to engage the audience and leave the audience with a sense of pity for the two lovers. In this scene, Romeo, crying, says “The doors of breath, seal with a righteous kiss…” From the quote, fate was highlighted due to the reason that Romeo says that he will seal the doors of breath, meaning that he will kill himself; yet, after he has said this, Juliet’s hand moves, but Romeo did not see. What engages the audience more is the dramatic irony, when the audience knows that Juliet is alive but Romeo doesn’t. This is the major method that the Luhrmann production recontextualises the
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
“The most filmed of all plays, ‘Romeo and Juliet’, with its universal themes… remains uniquely adaptable for any time period,” (Botnick, 2002). Directors Franco Zeffirelli (1968) and Baz Luhrman (1996) provide examples of the plays adaption to suit the teenage generation of their time. Identifying the key elements of each version: the directors intentions, time/place, pace, symbols, language and human context is one way to clearly show how each director clearly reaches their target audience. Overall however Luhrman’s adaptation would be more effective for capturing the teenage audience.
a major step in life. Because the play is not entirely trying to make the two look bad, it is the better product. & nbsp; Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral scene. The funeral scene of the play is a very serious event. Juliet's family is very upset and thinks that they are the cause of her "death". Also, the Friar. soothes the family of the loss of young Juliet (Act IV, Scene 5, Line 65). However, in the movie version of the funeral scene, again everyone is sad but This time the Friar lets out a giggle as he pretends to pray for Juliet. This is a major difference because if someone had seen the Friar giggle, it may have. changed the entire play. They may have questioned him why he giggled but since he would not have a reason he may just spill what he knows. Since the movie was once again unrealistic, the play is the better production in this scene as well. & nbsp; Some other major differences between the play and the movie occurred in the plot. details. One example of this is in the beginning of the story.
The light and dark imagery that Shakespeare uses in this passage describes Juliet as a young and eager lover. Romeo associates Juliet with light meaning goodness. Then Romeo says that Juliet looks like the excellent night. The night that Romeo speaks of represents Rosaline. Romeo basically says through with light and dark imagery, that Juliet is as good as Rosaline to love. Romeo then compares Juliet to a "winged messenger of heaven" who filled with lightness and goodness. He says that all humans look upon this kindness as the messenger "bestrides the lazy puffing clouds" while doing his errands. Romeo explains using this imagery that everyone looks at Juliet because she gives off a stunning and intricate outlook.
Throughout the film, it is clearly shown that the feud is deadly, referring to Mercutio and Tybalt’s death. Although poison has a literal purpose in the play, it also serves as a symbol of hatred between the two families. Friar Laurence uses a simile to apprise the belief that people are a lot like flowers—full of both “loveliness” and “rude-will,” even humans have the capability to be good or deadly. He mentions that it all depends on whether the “rude-will” takes over, which refers directly to how Romeo and Juliet’s love turns deadly when it is poisoned by the family’s vile feud. Due to the feud, the family would never allow the two lovers to be together which is the sole reason Juliet faked her own death and was brought to the Capulet tomb. When Romeo finds Juliet ‘dead’ in the Capulet tomb he can’t bear to live without her love, and he consumes poison which kills him. After Juliet regains consciousness and finds that her love is lifeless, she kills herself using Romeo’s dagger to be with him. This symbol displays that Juliet is happy to die as she describes the item that kills her with a positive connotation using the word ‘happy’. The star-crossed lovers can not cope life without one another. After their relationship was indisposed from the atrocious feud the lovers viewed no other choice representing
The play Romeo and Juliet is a widely known tragedy written by Shakespeare. Romeo and Juliet features two rival families and their children. When a daughter of Capulet and son of Montague meet at a party, sparks immediately fly. However, because of their families rivalry, they marry in secret, and were happy. That is until things took a turn for the worst. After an unexpected accident, Romeo is forced to leave the city, and he may never return. Juliet’s not sure she’ll ever see him again and tries to plan a way to be with Romeo, but ends up making things worse. It is an extremely tragic story. Or that’s what everyone is led to believe. However, the play Romeo and Juliet is in actuality a comedy. Between the overabundance of hyperbole, Paris’
Analysis of the First Scene of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare William Shakespeare is a famous play writer from the 1500’s. Most of
Even though the themes were similar, the plot of the movie and the play were rather different. In the movie, Mercutio, Romeo’s friend, got an invitation to Lord Caplet’s ball where Romeo and Juliet meet, but in the movie Romeo and this friends go to Lord Capulet’s party uninvited. What's more, is that when Romeo was at the ball he was recognized by Tybalt, Juliet’s cousin, from the sound of his voice in the play, but in the movie Tybalt sees him. In addition to that one scene where Juliet was hysterical because she thought Romeo was dead was completely absent in the movie.
3 Dec. 2013. Kerschen, Lios. A. A “Critical Essay on ‘Romeo and Juliet’. ” Drama for Students. Ed.
When the friar hears of this, he devises a plan so that the two lovers can be together. The major climax of the play comes when the friar gives Juliet a potion that will make it seem as though she has died, when in fact she is alive the whole time. While in Mantua, Romeo mistakenly hears that Juliet has actually died and he goes to lay by her side. Just as he takes a vile poison and dies, Juliet awakens to find her love lying dead at her side. She cannot fathom living in a world without Romeo, so she takes his sword and ends her own life.
The 1996 film, tries to show too much emotion, in doing so, it makes the scene weaker, by lessening some important aspects. In this version, Romeo visits Juliet in her tomb, unknowing of her and Friar Lawrence's plan. Juliet is shocked when she awakens to a dying Romeo. On screen, all she can do is stare into his eyes, as he slowly slips from the earth. While this seems to make it more emotional, it adds drama which doesn't have to be present. Mainly because in the opposing 1968 version, Juliet is completely shocked by Romeo´s death in a different way. A worse, colder way. The viewer can see the look in her eyes, as she stares
Although Luhrmann’s loyalty to the original story may be questioned, his film has proven to be entertaining and successful. The film has outpaced the other adaptations of Romeo and Juliet and other Shakespearean plays as can be seen from the approximately 30 million dollars that it made through tickets and box office sales. Just as there are avid followers of the original tale by Shakespeare, Luhrmann’s version has a big fan base which, since its release 1996, has seen the film reach cult status and it can be said that Luhrmann has modernized Romeo and Juliet just as it can be said that he has ruined a brilliant masterpiece that was fine the way it was.