Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exploring the roles of parents in romeo and juliet essay
Love Story Romeo Vs Juliet
Parents and children william shakespeare romeo and juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo? Deny thy father and refuse thy name;” (Shakespeare, 536). In the book, ‘Romeo and Juliet”, by William Shakespeare there is a deeper meaning that Shakespeare is trying to portray other than parents cannot control their children’s hearts. He is trying to portray that a name is only a name and it doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things and that even with a different name that person will still be the same person they have always been. Shakespeare is using the characters: Juliet, Romeo, Lord Capulet, Friar Lawrence, and the Nurse to get this message across to the reader or the viewer. Shakespeare uses Juliet to portray his message by having her marry Romeo. In scene two of the second act or more …show more content…
Romeo married Juliet even though she was supposed to be his sworn enemy. He also did not want to fight with Tybalt because even though Tybalt didn’t know that they were now cousins Romeo knew and he didn’t want to bring any harm to him. Lord Capulet had portrayed this message when he was throwing his party. Romeo, Benvolio, and Mercutio had decided to sneak into the party that was being thrown by Lord Capulet and Tybalt had found out that Romeo was there. After Tybalt had found this out, he asked someone to fetch him his rapier. Lord Capulet then tells Tybalt, “Content thee, gentle coz. Let him alone. He bears him like a portly gentleman, And, to say truth, Verona brags of him To be a virtuous and well-governed youth. I would not for the wealth of all the town Here in my house do him disparagement. Therefore be patient. Take no note of him. It is my will, the which if thou respect, Show a fair presence and put off these frowns, An ill-beseeming semblance for a feast.” (Shakespeare, 527) He says this meaning that Romeo has not done anything to harm them, so Tybalt is not allowed to do this either. When Tybalt says, “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I’ll not endure him.” (Shakespeare, 527) Lord Capulet gets angry and replies, “He shall be endured. What, goodman boy! I say, he shall. Go to. Am I the master here, or you? Go to. You’ll not endure him! God shall mend my soul, You’ll make a mutiny among my …show more content…
First, when Friar Lawrence married Romeo and Juliet in the sixth scene of act two, even if he only thought it would break the feud between the Capulets and Montagues, it also showed that if you fall in love with someone it doesn’t matter their last name. Then, throughout the play he continued to help them with their problems. After Romeo had slew Tybalt and had been banished from Verona, he went to Friar Lawrence and he helped Romeo figure out what to do. The Friar also helped Juliet get over Romeo being banished and having to almost marry Paris by giving her a potion that will make her seem deceased until after about forty-eight hours. The Nurse on the other hand was always there for Juliet when she needed her. She helped Juliet and Romeo with the wedding by relaying what Juliet was supposed to do to get married to Romeo back to Juliet. She had also gone to find Romeo for Juliet numerous times. The Nurse had also told Romeo and Juliet who each of them
Evidently, Tybalt respects Lord Capulet and the family name. When he goes to inform the Montague’s intrusion, Lord Capulet dismisses the enemy’s presence, ordering Tybalt to “be patient, take no note of him” (I.v.71). Despite Lord Capulet’s calm approach towards the appearance of Romeo, Tybalts mind is clouded with hatred and only views Romeo as a threat. Tybalt’s angered reaction at the sight of Romeo, as well as his impulsive decision to warn Lord Capulet in hopes of getting rid of the enemy, is due to the ongoing feud between the Montague’s and Capulet’s and not because of any harm directly caused by Romeo. Lastly, at his initial reaction to deny the announcement of Juliets death, Romeo dismisses Balthasar and seeks an apothecary who he hopes will supply him the poison that will grant his wish to be with Juliet forever.
Tybalt says that Romeo is a villain, a trouble maker. He states that he will not stand for
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
Tybalt is like many other young men his age and is immature. This can be seen in almost every action he makes. One can see his immaturity when he makes impulsive decisions, like when he wrote a letter to Romeo challenging him to a duel. Another immature thing that he does is when he sees a Montague, he automatically sees him/her as a evil villain because of the ancient feud. Tybalt states, “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe,/ A villain that is hither come in spite/ To scorn at our solemnity this night.” (1.5.69-71). He sees Romeo when at the party and instantly abandons any sense maturity or reason and assumes that that man is a villian, not knowing who he is or having any knowledge about him other than his name. His childish behavior can be seen through out
The friar wanted to unite the two families and he sees this marriage as a way to end the "ancient grudge". "For this alliance may so happy prove, to turn your households' rancour to pure love. " The audience are also aware that Tybalt had issued a challenge to Romeo, unknown to Romeo, because he hadn't returned home after the ball. Tybalt, a Capulet, had seen Romeo at the feast and vowed to take revenge at this insult to his family pride. Mercutio and Benvolio fear for Romeo's life because he is no match for Tybalt, an experienced swordsman.
In the play, Tybalt said to Romeo “This, by his voice, should be a Montague. — (to his PAGE) Fetch me my rapier, boy”(Shakespeare 1. 5. 676-677). This shows how little respect Tybalt had for Romeo. Romeo does not worry about Tybalt and doesn’t care what Tybalt says; Tybalt tries to cause problems but Romeo does not care.
The Nurse’s job is to take care of Juliet and raise her; however, upon learning that Juliet is romantically involved with their family’s enemy, she doesn’t provide any form of counsel to Juliet.” I must another way, To fetch a ladder by the which your love Must climb a bird’s nest soon when its dark.” (2.5.77-79). The Nurse aides Romeo by telling him to go to Juliet’s room, showing her approval of the relationship. She did not provide any form of counsel to Juliet or inform Capulet or Lady Capulet about Juliet’s relationship.
Another episode of fate, or rather dramatic irony, happens when Romeo somehow misses getting a letter from Tybalt Capulet, his enemy, challenging him to a duel. Romeo, unknowing of the tragic letter sent to him, but not gotten, goes to tell his friends of his beautiful bride, but, in return, comes face-to-face with none other than Tybalt, his loathed enemy, the kin to his new bride, Juliet. As soon as Romeo shows up, though, he is greeted by Tybalt’s insults, calling him a villain, but instead of stepping up to Tybalt’s challenge, though, Romeo backs down, saying, “Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a greeting. Villain I am none. Therefore farewell. I see thou knowest not me.” After harsh words are spoken, families are disgraced, and names are scorned, Romeo finally just backs away. Mercutio, though, cannot let his man be put to disgrace, so he decides to defend Romeo’s name.
When one looks closely at the story of Romeo and Juliet, one will see that it is a story with many ethical aspects. The first ethical concern was the two feuding families. How moral is it to hate someone only because they have a certain family name? This all come from a time period when people were fairly focused on religion, which teaches us not to hate. I also question this because I think it is ironic that both Romeo and Juliet seem to be fairly religious, since the first person Romeo went to for help was Friar Lawrence, and a few scenes in the play took place in or around the church. I think that this hatred is especially bad in the case of the Capulets and the Montagues, because I was always under the impression that the families had been feuding for so long that no one really knew why they hated each other anymore. This was the beginning of the problems for Romeo and Juliet. They had a moral decision to make. Should they stay true to their families, and deny their love, or should they stay true to their feelings and disgrace their families? In order to resolve this dilemma, Romeo turns to Friar Lawrence, who perhaps could be seen as the most moral character, to begin with. Because he was a holy man, he was the most logical confidant of anyone in the play. People see men of the cloth as reliable and a good source of advice. Of course, Friar Lawrence has every intention of helping the two lovers, also hoping that he could reunite the feuding families. However, unbeknownst to him, everything he will do throughout the play will have an unnerving consequence. No matter what he did to correct what he had done wrong, it only drug him deeper into trouble. Who ever would have thought that by marrying the two young lovers, he would have caused all of this heartache for the families, and really for all of Verona? No one ever considered the fact that two young people wanting to get married would have affected the entire city. Friar Lawrence was only trying to be a good friend and ally, but everything he did just ended up backfiring for him.
Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo? Deny thy father and refuse thy name; Or if thou wilt
If it were not for Capulet sending incompetent help to do his tasks or if Romeo had been in a different spot at that time and did not come in contact with the servant, then Juliet and Romeo would have never even met in the first place. Also, while attending that party, Romeo is discovered at the party by Juliet’s cousin Tybalt. Tybalt has a strong hatred for all Montague’s and when he discovers that one is attending his own family’s party it really angers him. He then goes straight to the head of the Capulet family and asks for permission to fight the intruder. Capulet does not want a fight at his party so he tells Tybalt to be patient and ignore him.
In the play, “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare, we are introduced to the character Tybalt; a member of the Capulet family. Based on Tybalt’s use of a simile in scene 1 (in which peace and Montagues are compared), it can be inferred that Tybalt is nothing but conceited, violent, and impetuous and will do anything for power; especially for control over his enemies. Part of this particular statement by Tybalt can be found in lines 63-65 as he intervenes in the fight between Gregory and Sampson and announces, “What, drawn, and talk of peace?... Have at thee coward!” In these specific lines, Tybalt clearly sees no reason for there to be peace especially when Benvolio has his sword drawn.
When Romeo was at the party though as stated in the second paragraph Tybalt saw him and it caused a lot of trouble. After seeing Juliet at the Capulet party Romeo married her in secret. Once Romeo and Juliet were married Romeo went into hiding for killing Tybalt. When Romeo was gone Juliet was to marry someone else against her will. As a result Juliet faked her death.
As a result of this fight, Romeo is banished from Verona and separated from Juliet, which leads to the tragic ending of the play. In Act 3, when the fight takes place, Tybalt says “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain… this shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done me. Therefore turn and draw,” (3.1.68) to which Romeo responds “I do protest I never injured thee.”(3.1.69) According to Tybalt, Romeo has injured him greatly, making him a villain; in truth, Romeo never hurt Tybalt in any way other than by simply being a Montague, which Tybalt proves when he says “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe, a villain that is hither come in spite to scorn at our solemnity this night” (1.5.69) during the Capulet’s party. Tybalt believes that Romeo has it in for them, even though Capulet ensures him that Romeo “bears him like a portly gentleman.”
P839Romeo is just who he ison the inside no who his family name says heis. Juliet#1 “be but sworn my love, And I’ll no longer be a Capulet. ”Juliet also says that her identity as a Capulet does not define her but rather her love for Romeo defines her.#2 “tis but thy name that is my enemy, Thou art thyself, though not aMontague.” P839Juliet is saying that a name doesnot make the person who they are. If Romeo were named Daudi he would still be who he is on the inside.