Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The perspective of history
What is the meaning of respect
What is the meaning of respect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The perspective of history
Roman Pantheon (c. AD 125) v. Macon Auditorium (ca.1900)
In this project, we going to compare two historical building, the Roman Pantheon (c.AD 125) and the Macon Auditorium completed in 1925 (“Macon City Auditorium”). Although very recent in historical perspective, we did find fewer information about the latest building compare to the Roman Pantheon. In this project, we did find a striking resemblance between these two building, starting from the idea behind the project, the architectural concept and it evolution and finally how these respective building fit within the time frame of their creator.
Built in the heart of Rome over 2000 years ego, the Pantheon is a massive concrete building even for modern day scales. It was designed for social gathering, mainly religious. It comprise of a
…show more content…
combination one circular building called the rotunda and one rectangular building called the Pronaos. The façade mirror the one of the Greek Temple with massive Corinthian order style colons that support the roof. The circular section of the building is cover by a massive concrete dome with a central hole that let the light in the building. The interior of the dome is decorated with geometric shapes blocks. The overall building look rather rough and crude, according to Milo, Gary, James and Edmund, the building lack the balance and poise of those of the Greek, the ornaments were not perfectly integrated into the architectural plan (Milo et al 67). We therefor did not see the natural progress in the Art evolution in term of design and technique during this time, and this could only be explain according to above mention authors by the fact that Roman were not natural artist but buyers and borrowers whose copies were often less expressive than the originals( 67). Just as the Pantheon, the Macon city Auditorium is situated at the heart of the city and the main purpose of this massive still and concrete building is for social events not only limited to religious, but also political cultural and economic. The Architectural style of the building is often characterized as Neoclassical Greek revival (“Macon City Auditorium”). The only reliable information we gathered about the size of this building was related to the Great Hall seats capacity which total over 2600 split between 14000 square-foot floors. Similar to ancient Greek arena, the Great Hall is a basin shape like siting area overlooking a stage decorated with scene of Macon area history (“Macon City Auditorium”). A cooper Dome dominate the roof and the Doric style column surround three side of the building. The decorative features of the building are rather refined, stylish and elegant. A visitor will experience the beauty and the grandiose of our ancients Architectural past in the light of modern technology of concrete and still. Another aspect of modernity is the modular Hall in other to accommodate the space according to the events; the seats arrangement and the stage will be different whether the event is a concert, a sporting event of a state fair. We observe on the Macon Auditorium the natural progression of an Art form as it fit in the modern context, unlike the Pantheon in Rome. Comparing the Roman Pantheon (c.AD 125) to The Macon Auditorium would seem unfair and counter intuitive, however major observation can be noted here: first the vision of the Art creator of the people that commission those work are the same, grandiose, Majestics and for functional for the enjoyment of the community, the desire to create an everlasting piece of Art that will tell the stories of those who lived at that time to many generation to come.
Second, these two structure perfectly aligned themselves with the trend of their respective era. Third, despite being thousand years apart in term of style and techniques, those two structures achieved a very similar goal in defining beauty, somewhat harmony and strength. The evolution of the work of Art can be observe as we go from the rough exterior aspect of the Roman Pantheon to the slick and stylish aspect of the Macon Auditorium. Through our public building and even in some case our private home each of us live in a little piece of the Pantheon. We can forcefully assert that the Middle Age set the foundation of our modern society through various form of Art, and Architecture is the living proof of Art defining the human
experience.
For much of the last millennia many great architects have looked upon the Pantheon as a staple of classical architecture, as well as a model for many modern day buildings. Created by the Romans, the Pantheon would use many elements better than any other works of architecture to that time. No further than Columbia Missouri is this evident in the construction of what used to be known as the First Academic Building on the University of Missouri campus. The Architects Bell and Binder headed the creation of the new building after the First Academic Building burnt down in 1892. Known today as Jesse Hall, this modern day work of architecture pulls many elements from the Pantheon to create a unique work of public space. The most glaring comparison of both comes from the domes that top both buildings. Each building also shares similar characteristics in their front facades. Yet, while there are many similarities to both works, each contain unique differences in their layout and construction.
Q: Use St. Peter’s Basilica and Donato Bramante’s Tempietto in Rome, in opposition to John Balthasar Neumann’s Pilgrimage Church of Vier(7) in Bamburg, Germany, to argue that a rational engagement with architecture is a more effective means to comprehend and understand architectural form. During the period of Renaissance, human’s thought and intelligence has reached its highest and its effect on the architectural form, it became clear and its engagement of rational aspect on the building. Mainly geometrical forms are the characteristics which can be identified. Not so long after the Renaissance period of Baroque architecture was introduced, rather than logic and reasoning they wanted to capture the emotional atmosphere by using the architectural elements such as light, height, crafted art, costly materials and so on as mentioned by(Scotti 2007, 5-10).
In conclusion, although Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II and Augustus of Primaporta, do appear very different, come from entirely different geographic regions and were separated by thousands of years, they do have many things in common. When we consider subject, style, and function; perhaps other works of art have more in common than they appear to have.
Although the Pantheon and the Cathedral of Chartres are both some of the greatest architectural advances in history they are very different. We can compare the time that each of the buildings was built, where and for who they were built for, and why they were built. Another thing we can compare is the structure of the buildings and the type of material they are built from.
Many years separate the construction and initial use of these two buildings, yet they share a similar purpose and structural elements. The differences are few, they are obviously different buildings. One paid homage to one goddess, while another worshipped all. Their uses after their high time varied as well. In the end though, both are known and celebrated as representative of the classical styles of their time for the cultures. Pillars and columns are used in architecture even now to give the idea of prominence and power. In brief, this short essay discussed the highlights of both
Pantheon and Hagia Sophia Pantheon and Hagia Sophia are two extremely outstanding architectural pieces of their times. They have been built according to the traditions of those particular times. The materials used to built these buildings and the purpose for which they were used are all very important aspects and have been briefly covered in this report. Pantheon The statesman Agrippa built pantheon in 27 B.C. Then it was completely rebuilt by the emperor Hadrian. The Pantheon is remarkable for its size, its construction, and its design. The dome was the largest built until modern times. The present structure was probably originally built as a temple for all the pagan gods. We do hear of it as being a law-court and a reception area for Emperor Hadrian meeting his quests too. Some say that the rotunda of the building was once a Roman bath. Due to all this mystery, the Pantheon is often referred to as the Sphinx of Rome. The visitor will probably not appreciate the construction as much as the Flavian amphitheatre, but it is still a great masterpiece of engineering and well worth a visit. Most Roman and Greek temples at the time of the Pantheon's construction were large, colonnaded, rectangular enclosures with sanctuaries situated in their centers. The Pantheon was different. It consisted of a large circular drum topped with a hemispherical dome. It is a masterpiece of both engineering and art a lasting memory of Ancient Rome’s might. Roman architecture is architecture of wall and enclosed tactile space. Individual column with entablature is no longer the basic architectural unity. Spatially, it shows a development from closed, simple space units and regular articulation to more complex spatial relations, more fluid interpenetrati...
The city of Rome delivers rich culture, influential architecture, and beautiful scenery that collectively demonstrate a course of great history and a prominent civilization. There are various structures from Imperial Rome that are highly recognized and mentioned within artistic research. Some examples include the Pantheon, Basilica Ulpia, Flavian Amphitheater, Arch of Titus, and Column of Trajan. Also referred to as Trajan’s Column, the iconic sculpture retains a prestigious appearance as it’s shown with characteristics of empowering height and intricate detail (Fig. 1). When analyzing such a remarkable piece of artwork one should consider the different elements that pertain to the subject matter and historical context. With that in mind, this paper presents the argument that the column is not only a portrayal of the Dacian Wars but also a funerary monument, paradigm of military inspiration, and tribute to Trajan’s reign.
As one of the greatest structures in Rome, the Pantheon was built between 118 and 128 CE. It is described as the most remarkable ancient building surviving in Rome. After being destroyed and rebuilt twice, it was renamed the “Temple of the Gods”. In 126 AD, the Pantheon was restored to its glory, by the architects who at that time has learned and mastered their craft in concrete construction in the Greek Classical order. They constructed a massive 25 foot thick walls which was to support the huge dome made of concrete to be placed at the top. The dome was the largest ever made of unreinforced concrete at 43.4 meters in diameter (Matthews, Roy and Platt pg. 5).
When walking around a city, you may notice that the architecture and art look similar to other works. Many of these designs have changed along the course of history and time whilst others have not. The designs that many people still see in society and day to day living is from two of the many cultures of the old civilizations, Roman and Islamic. The art and architecture forms from the Islamic and Roman cultures have many comparisons and contrasts between them. They, the Islamic and Roman nations, have both adopted from other cultures and have made their own discoveries in the art and architecture worlds. The Roman and Islamic architecture and art vary drastically from each other and yet have varying comparisons between the two.
Rome, Italy’s capital, is a stretched, city with nearly 3,000 years of influential art, architecture and culture written to share to the world. Ancient Rome was one of the most advanced societies in its time. Ancient Roman culture lasted a long time in the history of the civilization of Ancient Rome. ancient Rome was a joint of the city of Rome which a lot of the activity’s happen. Ancient Rome is known for the prominent Colosseum which is the largest amphitheater ever built. , the , and the Pantheon.The Roman Pantheon is the most maintained and dominant buildings of ancient Rome. It is a Roman temple dedicated to all the gods of ancient Rome. The city also had many other theaters, gymnasiums, and many taverns. most of the population in Rome lived in
The reason for this piece is to attempt a comparison between two architectural examples that employ classical design from different stylistic eras of architectural history. The two styles I've chosen to discuss are the Renaissance and Baroque periods. An understanding of classical architecture needs to be made, as it is the fundamental style of any period that developed architecturally
For this task, the two art periods that I have decided to compare are the Baroque and the Neoclassical periods. The discipline within in the humanities that I have choose to focus on for this essay is the aspect of architecture in the respective periods.
The differences between the art of Roman and other civilizations were that every Roman arts whether were sculptures or architectures had served some purposes and played certain roles in the daily lives of Roman citizens. For example, Romans love to build small concrete building with the vaulting systems. The small building which was called the bay (Pg. 105). This unique system helps to construct much fine and greatest architecture for Romans such as the Sanctuary of Fortuna Primigenia, the Colosseum and the Basilica of Constantine. The Pantheon of Rome was also another striking example of fine Roman structure. These structures were often used for religion matters, public meetings and entertainment for every Roman citizen. If any Roman citizens wanted to have some fun, they would attend the Colosseum and watched the gladiatorial game or a series of chariot race. If some other citizens wanted to seek God or certain deity, they would likely to go to the Sanctuary of Fortuna Primigenia. In fact, architectures were significant in the lives of Roman citizens.
The development of Christian act and architecture University of the People Abstract The aim of this essay is, through my understanding of the development of Christian art and architecture, to describe how was it unique, and explain to what extent was it influenced by the classical Roman art and architecture . Key Words: Christian art and architecture, Classical Roman art and architecture To begin with, the mere mention of Christian art and architecture was reminiscent of Christian times in Rome, and in my opinion, those non-conformists have not carried the torch of Greek legacy, but also tried to make some exciting artistic breakthrough in the fields of painting, sculpture and architecture. Additionally,
From the time of the ancient Greeks all the way to modern day, some part of humanity has almost always been interested in the past. For the ancient Greeks, it was discovering Mycenaean ruins and composing stories about them. Today, inspiration is still drawn from classical architecture. One has to look no further than the U.S. capitol building, or even the University of Michigan's Angell Hall to see remnants of this architectural style. This raises the question of why does it still persists? Logically, the best way to answer this is to examine the origins of classical architecture, and what it represented then and now. Furthermore, the study of ancient architecture can show insights into past civilizations which otherwise would have been lost.