Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roman Army
What made the Roman army so great
Innovations of roman architecture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roman Army
The Roman army was unbeatable for approximately 300 years, so they must have perfected the art of war at the time. The Roman army’s skill, effective chain of command, discipline, organization, and extensive training enabled it to fight its way to victory. As a matter of a fact, the Roman army’s tactics were so brilliant that they are similar to modern military tactics today. The organization of the Roman army was imperative to its success as a whole. The basis of the Roman army was a legion. A legion is composed of ten cohorts: the first having 800 men and five centuriae of 160 men. The rest of the cohorts consisted of 480 men and six 80 men centuriae: each commanded by a centurion. Each centuria was divided into ten contubernia, where the …show more content…
Having a well-rounded legion enable the Romans to overcome obstacles that other armies considered unfeasible and heavily time-consuming: such as expansive rivers. The Romans easily engineered temporary bridges to rush troops across rivers and surprise the enemy: then retreating, removing the bridge, and leaving the opposing troops in great awe and confusion. Engineers complemented the artillery operators because they empowered the operators to constantly rain destruction upon the enemy by ensuring that the artillery stayed in a state of operation. Architects complemented the engineers by drawing out blueprints for their innovative creations. Architects also complemented artillery operators by collaborating with them to design artillery that would be the most effective in destroying enemy structures and resulting in the Romans gaining the upper hand and decisive …show more content…
The cohorts had a clear chain of command: “A legate in charge of a legion of ten cohorts could control his force far more easily. Instead of having to deal with thirty immediate subordinates, he had only direct his ten cohort commanders. These men could themselves be left to control the 480 men under their command. A cohort was far more than the sum of the three maniples composing it. It possessed a clear command hierarchy and was accustomed to operating together as a unit. The result was a far more flexible legion, capable of successfully undertaking complex plans (Goldsworthy 34).” The Romans obviously did not have cell phones back then, so being able to rapidly disperse a command was a major key to victory and preventing the loss of men. These tactics resulted in the conduction of effective military drills. The Roman army was able maintain a wide and shallow line of troops: which poorly trained troops, often the opposition, could not do because staying in such a wide formation would result in the encountering of more obstacles which threw them off and resulted in disorder. The Roman army would easily win swordfight battles because their wider formations “have as high a proportion of its men as possible in contact with the opposing unit, and therefore in the front rank of its formation” (Goldsworthy 177). This wider formation allowed the Romans to swarm, and even double team, the enemy and be
“This account I have given the reader, not so much with the intention of commending the Romans, as of comforting those that have been conquered by them, and for the deterring others from attempting innovations under their government. This discourse of the Roman military conduct may also perhaps be of use to such of the curious as are ignorant of it, and yet have a mind to know it.” –excerpt from “Description of the Roman Army,” by Josephus
... middle men between the troops and the Senate, and were looked on by their soldiers as looking out for their best interests. The soldiers relied on their general to give them what they needed, be it arms and armour, pay or land to retire on, and in return the generals wanted loyalty from their troops. As the legions were firmly in control of their generals, they were content to become a threat to the Republic and willing to become akin to private armies, following Generals such as Sulla to march on Rome or other generals.
The Roman military was great and powerful, but didn’t just end up that way over night. They worked hard and, as the Romans are known for their excellent engineering skills, tried to stay one step ahead of the enemy. One way they did this was siege weapons, which was how the seized castles and lands. Siege engines ingeniously used both potential energy, kinetic energy and rotational kinetic energy to throw things very far, fast, and even accurately. Besiegers could fire 100-200 pound stones up to 1,000 feet. The main siege weapons were catapults. The catapult was used to destroy buildings and walls inside and outside of the castle, and it could also destroy an enemies morale by throwing severed heads of comrades.
These reforms changed Roman life as well as the face of the Roman army, moving it away from its classical infantry-based structure to a more cavalry-based system. The army was reorganized into lightly armed troops called "limitanei" who defended the border, and large mobile armies composed of troops called "comitatenses". Border troops were given land to live on around forts they protected. This structure led to farming becoming the job of the border troops so that they could feed as well as protect those on the frontier. Over time, this in turn led to out of date weaponry and neglect in training.
The Roman military was arguably the most important factor in Rome’s illustrious history. Using your knowledge of Rome’s military from the video, text, and the document provided, make an argument for why the Roman military was so successful.
During his reign, Augustus made a number of changes how the Roman military operated. As Rome shifted from a Republic to Empire and the ideas of what Rome was to be was carefully being crafted by Augustus to fit his own narrative, the army went through a number of changes to support the new dynamic of Empire and Emperor. These changes to the army allowed the army to grow to fit its new role, and helped Rome to become a true military power.
By allowing more people into the army, giving them a personal reason to join, and forcing them to grow stronger, Marius made the military considerably more effective, which naturally lead to the swift gaining of territory and the transition of Rome from republic to empire, and
The Roman Army was a masterpiece in itself. There was no other army like it, and was impenentrable. This was probably because of the extreme patriotism and pride in battling for Rome, and maintaining their superiority. Gladiator, "RomanArmy.com", and The History of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire all portray this patriotism in many aspects.
Rome could not have succeeded without the personal freedom and individuality granted to its citizens. This nurtured a creative and inventive mind, which would not be hindered by the limitations of oppressive monarchies. People lived for their own greater good more than the government, as in America. America and Rome both produced technologies that made their economies dominate over their neighbors, appreciating the value of their currencies. A strong sense of peace and order helped each country thrive, as the fear of trading and making money dissipated. The Roman military was the most advanced of its day. Soldiers were more equipped and armed than any other army, and the best methods of siege craft were employed in battle. The American military shares the sam...
The strength of the Roman military was the string that held the Roman Empire together for as long as it lasted. The military was made up of strictly disciplined men whom were ready and willing to serve their emperor.
During their time, the strategy the Roman’s employed was second to none. The success of their strategy started with the Roman’s separating their armies into smaller, more specific types. They used many different types of infantry throughout the years, but the main types they used were the velites, hastati, principes, triarii, and later the famous Legionaries were introduced (Roman Empire Wars). These infantry worked together on the battlefield to effectively eliminate the enemy and win the battle.
There are many political, economic, sociological causes to the growth and expansion of the Roman republic and later the Roman Empire, but one major factor of expansion that the Romans are most famous for is there Army. There Army was famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and there mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. According to our text Roman warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the Roman pursuit of victory was relentless. The Romans had a pragmatic view towards atrocity and massacre that viewed almost any act as justifiable if it eased the path of victory (Goldsworthy 2000) p. 24. The hoplite phalanx which originated by the Greeks and later adopted by the Roman army, demanded great discipline and adherence to orders in order for this group of soldiers...
this project I aim to show how two parts of the Roman army: a) its
Simkin, John. “ Military Tactics of the Roman Army.” spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk. Spartacus Educational, Sept. 1997- June 2013. Web. 9 Nov. 2013.
Throughout history, no other era was more significant than that of the Roman Empire. The power and influence of the Roman government and it=s rule over the world was accomplished by the Roman Army. The Roman army was the ultimate weapon of war because of the well trained men, their effective weapons and their brilliant battle tactics.