Role Of An Unjust Society In Ayn Rand's Anthem

664 Words2 Pages

An Unjust Society
The Novel Anthem by Ayn Rand follows the story of Equality 7-2521. He as an individual that ultimately decided to stand proud for his life, limb and liberty and curse the society that tried to take that away from him. Therefore, I believe he is fully right for him to change his mind and disagree with the leaders of his society; he would also agree with Ayn Rand essay “How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society”.
First, Equality should be correct in changing his view about his society. Since he was a child he was “not happy in those years in the Home of the Students. It was not that the learning was too hard for us. It was that the learning was too easy. This is a great sin” (Rand, 21). It is a shame that he …show more content…

No because, when Equality met with the World Council of Scholars, a council member critically said, “How dared you think that your mind held greater wisdom than the kids of your brothers? And if the Councils had declared that you should be a street sweeper, how dared you think that you could be of greater use to men than is sweeping the streets?” (Rand, 71-72). The council member said that if Equality was forced to be a street sweeper for the greater good of all men and that he has no further use to men other than cleaning the streets. Equality is not free at all and therefore he isn’t happy, and the basis that built this society is broken. Furthermore, when Equality start seeing The Golden one, He mentions a rule, “For men are forbidden to take notice of women, and women are forbidden to take notice of men.” (Rand, 39). Meaning that men lack freedom not only in professional matters but in personal matters, also. His leader must be ignorant and incompetent to not see that this is the exact opposite of what this society stands …show more content…

First off, it start with “I will name only one principle…That principle is: One must never fail to pronounce moral judgement (“How does…”). At the end of the story, He morally judges his society and decides that it must change. Furthermore, “It is not justice or equal treatment that you grant to men when you abstain equally from praising men's virtues and from condemning men’s vices.” (“How does…”). Equality would agree with this statement because he was punished for all the “sins” that he committed and the only virtues his society had was for everything to be done together. Finally, “Moral values are the motive power of a man’s actions” (“How does…”). I believe that all of Equality’s actions were because of moral value from him writing his pages to naming The Golden One to him breaking out of

Open Document