Rodin And Henry Moore Analysis

568 Words2 Pages

Artists reimagine the human form in their artworks by using past experiences, intentions, ideas, materials, practises and applying them to the human form in an abstracted or changed reformation. World issues and interests also contribute to the recreation of the human form as they can give a traumatising or positive impression on the artist which would lead to new ideas for recreation. Art is an outlet for an artist to release his/her inner intentions and any other beliefs that cannot be seen by looking at his/her physical appearance, naturally these hidden beliefs, intentions, experiences can be easily moulded and distorted into and abstract and intricate piece of art.

Henry Moore (30 July 1898 – 31 August 1986) was the most influential English sculptor of his generation. Examples of his masterpieces include “The reclining figure” “King and Queen” and “large interior form” all organic artworks that depict and emphasise the human figure in a new …show more content…

In comparison to Henry Moore, Rodin’s work is much more realistic in fact critics were quoted saying that the artwork was thought to be cast from a living model whereas Moore’s work is greatly abstracted. If you look at “The Thinker” by Rodin and “the reclining figure” by Moore you will see Rodin’s work has such explicit detail from facial features to hair grooves keeping in mind that this is a metal sculpture and Moore has no facial features or even a top half of a head. Rodin once said “To the artist there is never anything ugly in nature.” this is evidence to Rodin’s favour of the human figure as it is, he was very fond of nature as many artists are. His creations focused on media not figure. Using refined natural materials like bronze and other metals he was able to reimagine the human figure in a different

Open Document