Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benjamin franklin the autobiography role of education
Benjamin franklin the autobiography role of education
Benjamin franklin the autobiography role of education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As Benjamin Franklin once said, “Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn”. This is exactly what the Rocky Mountain College’s debate team is doing by collaboratively teaching debate workshops at tribal colleges around Montana and Wyoming.
The Tribal College Debate Program was started in the spring of 2013. The program is funded by a 34,000 dollar grant from the Open Society Institute through International Debate Education Association or IDEA, an organization that has been in existence for over 20 years, works with young people from all over the world in realm of debate. The grant has made it so that Rocky’s debate team has been able to teach more than 10 different workshops at several different colleges including
Little Bighorn Community College located in Crow Agency and Chief Dull Knife College located in Cheyenne Indian Reservation. Native American Reservations in Montana are a hub for political discussion and discourse. The debate workshops like the TCD program provide a chance for the people at the colleges to discuss and explore both sides of complicated issues to be able to gain a better understanding of them and the effect they have on the community. The workshops not only help the students at the tribal colleges but they also help the students on the debate team. When RMC students go and teach debate augmentation under the British Parliamentary style, it not only helps them hone and practice the skills they need to be successful at for competitions but it also helps them to understand what they are doing on a higher level. When asked about her experiences teaching at the tribal colleges, Annastacia Anderson, sophomore, said, “Teaching at the tribal colleges has been an incredible experience for me. It has not only been eye opening about Native American issues but also a great learning experience for debate. Dissecting argumentation and teaching it to someone else has increased my own understanding of argumentation and how to relate to my peers”. Programs like the Tribal College Debate Program are revolutionary This program is the first of its kind in Montana and in the country. It provides a great opportunity to create a network of debate and civil engagement between colleges that currently do not have the resources to this on their own. The creation of this network is important because of how spaced out the higher education opportunities are. When that amount of physical distance exists it makes collaboration between the schools incredibly hard. The Tribal College Debate Program makes this needed collaboration possible.
he enduring debate is a book that was written by John J. Coleman. It outlines the issues and the existing readings in the history of American politics. The politics of America have been defined by a number of great articles from great philosophers. Some of the writers who wrote about the constitution in America include former presidents such as James Madison. Chapter 3 of the book talks about federalism. Federalism is a form of government that advocates for two or more units to contribute equally to the control of one geographical region. Federal government advocates for sharing of power between the central government and the other units of governance. The discussion below is the summary of the readings on federalism.
John Rutledge was brought up through a wealthy family in Charleston South Carolina. In the year of 1739 his mother and father were gifted with their first of two sons that lead to sign the constitution.
In her article, “Lecture Me. Really”, Molly Worthen addresses the issue college students know all too well: how to lecture properly. Published in the New York Times, Worthen writes a passionate article about lecturing but from the perspective of a professor. Worthen presents the idea that lecturing, although some may think ineffective in the classroom, is a way to truly challenge and engage students into critically thinking. Worth dictates this idea with an excellent build up logical argument but lacks the proper evidence to support her claims creating a faulty argument.
The debate team of Wiley College faced many colleges to be recognized and finally in the end winning a debate against the reigning debating champions, Harvard University. One of the debaters who caught my attention was James Farmer Jr., the youngest on the team that started out as an alternative. James Farmer sought recognition from adults and wanted to show everyone he was capable of debating. James Farmer incorporates a lot of Ethos and Pathos into his speech making, allowing him to leave his audience filled with emotions and in awe. Although James Farmer interested me, especially the way he presented his final speech, James Farmer and I are very different in the way we deliver our speeches.
Chapter nine of Enduring Debate talks about how the American opinion poll plays role in constructing the government and how the media has affected the American politics. The public polling promotes democracy by allowing citizens to give their views concerning issues in government. The opinion polls also keep the government on toes. The main ideas are based on the founding of the American state and the constitution. Constitutionalism is based on the concept of the rule of law and limited authority. American constitutional principles can be traced back over 200 years ago. However, the practical meaning of constitutionalism is a recent and peculiar achievement. In the American history before the constitution was implemented, most governments were established by use of force, heredity, the need to stop anarchy and by the belief in God’s will. During out the history, this style of establishing authority has endorsed power to different leaders with different characteristics. Some were dictators, divine, kings, tyrants while others were bureaucratic. These people had full control of power. They exercised absolute authority. The main reason is that there were no instruments of power such as constitution that could limit and keep in check the powers of these forms of government.
Americans have embraced debate since before we were a country. The idea that we would provide reasoned support for any position that we took is what made us different from the English king. Our love of debate came from the old country, and embedded itself in our culture as a defining value. Thus, it should not come as a surprise that the affinity for debate is still strong, and finds itself as a regular feature of the mainstream media. However, if Deborah Tannen of the New York Times is correct, our understanding of what it means to argue may be very different from what it once was; a “culture of critique” has developed within our media, and it relies on the exclusive opposition of two conflicting positions (Tannen). In her 1994 editorial, titled “The Triumph of the Yell”, Tannen claims that journalists, politicians and academics treat public discourse as an argument. Furthermore, she attempts to persuade her readers that this posturing of argument as a conflict leads to a battle, not a debate, and that we would be able to communicate the truth if this culture were not interfering. This paper will discuss the rhetorical strategies that Tannen utilizes, outline the support given in her editorial, and why her argument is less convincing than it should be.
"Fighting for Our Lives" offers great insight into the current state of public dialogue. Deborah Tannen describes how our public interactions have increasingly become "warlike", in the way we discuss ideas, the way we cover the news, and the way we settle disputes. She observes that an adversarial approach has become the standard as much in public dialogue as it has in "just about anything we need to accomplish". Although she concedes that "conflict and opposition are as necessary as cooperation and agreement", she believes that the balance has been tipped in recent years. An "argument culture" has pervaded American culture, and the consequences are real.
A mere question is how Tannen pulls the reader into her article titled “The Argument Culture.” Deborah Tannen uses multiple rhetorical devices such as language, logos, and imagery to explain in depth the “adversarial mindset” plaguing America and shows us her solution in the article “The Argument Culture”. Tannen wanted to inform Americans how argument based we truly are and persuade us to make change. Like I stated earlier Tannen begins this process by placing a question in our minds, “Balance. Debate. Listening to both sides. Who could question these Noble American traditions” (Tannen 403)? Tannen then structures her article to develop understanding of the concept among the uninformed. Ethos, Pathos, and Logos also play a key role in the description of the culture, but Tannen adds in real life examples and imagery to create mental
Many historical films are based on true stories, but how many of them are historically accurate? The Great Debaters is based on the true story of an African-American debate team from Wiley college in the 1930s. While this is an extraordinary and inspirational film, it is full of historical inaccuracies.
During the Second Industrial Revolution two philosophies combated each other on a global scale. Laissez-Fair economics had ruled for the last few centuries and had created many prosperous nations but abuses of power by wealthy men had turned public opinion against it. Ever since its creation, Socialism begged to be placed head to head with Capitalism and it had finally gotten its chance. Laissez-Fair economics and Socialism both have their pros and cons when implemented in society. The battle between these two ideological works its way throughout society alternating between the protests and debates in the U.S. today to the great terror of the Cold War.
White, Fred D., and Simone J. Billings. The Well-crafted Argument: Across the Curriculum. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2013. Print.
Cell phones they are everywhere nowadays, they have become a need in the eye of the public. One feels much more connected to others with a cell phone in hand. Social Networking apps and texting, aid one to be more connected and closer to others around them. Cellphones serve as a reassurance that if one is in an accident, they have a resource to call for help. It’s not only adults who need a cell phone youth twelve and over should have one for the same reasons as adults do. The number one reason one buys a cell phone is to feel safe if an accident occurs. Adults are not the only one who accidents happen to youth are prone to them as well. For example, kidnappings happen mainly to preteens who have become more independent and have not yet learned how to keep to safe since they are very naïve. GPS trackers are fairly common in cell phones, providing a peace of mind as to where the child really is. Websites can easily be blocked on the cell phone. If the parent does not feel texting is vital they may get a talk only plan. A feature phone may be ideal as well they only have the basic func...
A spate of high-profile baby abandonments throughout the nation in recent years has led to a movement in some states to allow women to give away unwanted newborns at selected medical facilities.
The purpose of this reflective essay on the debate is to analyse my team and my own personal learning style and experience of participating in the debate and in the preparation period - that started in week 7 with the mock debate - by structured and based on Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles theory, and examine some ideas for my future practice.
debate, that we must look at both sides of the issue to better understand it