Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychological aspects of movies
Cold war movie analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychological aspects of movies
Rocky IV was produced in the year of 1985 and directed by Sylvester Stallone, who also plays the main character, Rocky Balboa, along with Dolph Lundgren and Carl Weathers. This film is much more than a victory for the American champion, Rocky Balboa as it highlights the hardships of the Cold War. The film focuses on then tensions of the Cold War in the shadows of Ivan Creed and Rocky Balboa, but more importantly, it communicates the powerful message that despite two countries’ long history of rivalry and hatred, there can be change.
The story of Rocky IV conveys the significant competition and mutual conflicts that had developed between the Americans and the Soviets during the Cold War. The Soviet Union’s most famous boxer, Ivan Drago, announces
…show more content…
As the movie progresses, the competition between the countries also increases. While watching the film, I found the Russians to be technologically superior and arrogant and the Americans appeared more old school and traditional. During the press conference with Drago, Apollo Creed expresses comments that heat up the upcoming fight between the two. The fight between Creed and Drago begins with an astonishing performance from America as Creed gets overconfident with his performance. However, things take a turn quickly as the two nations are shocked that Creed was physically unfit for his Russian opponent, he dropped dead in only the second round. This scene represented direct fighting between representatives of two vicious countries that resulted in death. Rocky Balboa soon made a rash decision to defeat Drago not only for …show more content…
From the beginning of the film, the Russians appeared fearless and harsh towards Americans. As an American, it is difficult not to feel irritated at the behavior of the opposing country. The plot of the story was quite easy to follow, and I found the actors very effective in their roles since they made the film appear as a thriller and kept me wanting to know the end result. There were many confrontations between the two countries during their press conferences that seem to be showing the audience that Drago represents Russia, as Creed represents America during this time period. Their attitudes towards each other are obviously hostile, and it is clear in these scenes that they are recreating the complexity of the Cold War. Though it is an adequately short film, it conveys an important message. At the end of the film, viewers could see that the two rivalries have somewhat accepted each other, as Rocky represents this in the boxing ring. He conveys a message to the crowd after his victory over Drago that got the entire arena’s attention. The crowd, including the Russian hierarchy, excepted Rocky [America] for his logic for a change. The moral of Rocky IV is that despite the circumstances, peace is still possible and change can be brought
“The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war” (Library of Congress). The Soviet Union and The United States were complete opposites, The United States was a democracy whereas The Soviet Union was a dictatorship. This only began their differences though, their economies, beliefs, goals, and even their fears, everything about them made them different except for their enemy. The
This boxing match, though he fails to beat Dragline, demonstrates Luke's ability and eagerness to disobey authority. Instead of personally dis...
The terms hawks and doves' were quick labels attached to politicians in order to categorize their views on war and foreign policies, as to make them understandable and accessible for the public. However, these labels were not always accurate and in some cases could be quite misleading; it would have been more accurate not to label individuals as either Hawks or Doves, but instead, what they stood for.
The political ideologies of the USA and of the Soviet Union were of profound significance in the development of the Cold War. Problems between the two power nations arose when America refused to accept the Soviet Union in the international community. The relationship between the USA and the Soviet Union was filled with mutual distrust and hostility. Many historians believe the cold war was “inevitable” between a democratic, capitalist nation and a communist Union. Winston Churchill called the cold war “The balance of terror” (1). Cold war anxieties began to build up with America and the Soviet Union advancing in the arms race for world dominance and supremacy. America feared the spread of Communism
QUESTION 2: The Cold War is an international conflict, a global fight between the United States and the Soviet Union that began in Europe in the wake of World War II but quickly expanded into Asia and the Third World. These international events, however, undoubtedly influenced domestic American politics between 1945 and 1965. How did the international Cold War shape, influence, or change domestic American politics in the first twenty years of the conflict?
There are many stereotypes in the American society that bestows an idea of the depiction of Russians. From past Olympics, we see that the Russians excel in sports and are powerful individuals. We also see the power and intelligence which come from this country.
There were multiple different conflicts. One, was between two Russian cosmonauts that had drank too much then got in a fist fight. The second was between, Lapierre and the Russian commander, when he kissed her multiple times when she did not want to be kissed. The third was between the international space team and IBMP’s lack of response to the troubles that the Russians caused.
The movie opens just as it ends, the camera pans down to the pavement revealing a sign outside the Barbizon Plaza Theater: “An Evening with Jake LaMotta Tonight 8:30.” The film then cuts to a punched out overweight shot of LaMotta babbling a barely coherent rhyming rant mixing Shakespeare with the infernal jabber of an half illiterate has been boxer. Quickly the scene shifts from backstage of a nightclub to a close up of a younger LaMotta receiving repeated jabs to the face. The bold white title card “Jake La Motta 1941” jumps out against the stark grey images of the match. LaMotta between rounds sits in the corner surrounded by his trainer, manager and cut man giving the impression of lion tamers antagonizing a corned animal by telling him he is “out pointed” and “You’re gonna have to knock him out.” When the fight continues LaMotta crouches like a coiled snake boring his way into a barrage of punches only to explode in a flurry of flashbulbs sending his opponent to the canvas. With a bombardment of hard stuck lefts, LaMotta sends Jimmy Reeves on a return trip to the mat. Again, in the final round a bloody pulverized Reeves lies pinned to the floor only to be saved by the bell after the count reaches nine. LaMotta then proceeds to strut around the ring proudly wearing a leopard skin robe with hands held high w...
The more you fight in the fight club the tougher and stronger you become. Getting into a fight tests who you are. No one helps you so you are forced to see your weaknesses. The film celebrates self-destruction and the idea that being on the edge allows you to be beaten becuase nothing really matters in your life.
In Kurt Vonnegut’s two short stories, ‘All the Kings Horses’ and ‘Manned Missiles’, he tried to reflect on the actual international backdrops of the time the stories were based on, in two different ways. While both stories reflected on the events that took place during the Cold War, the author managed to portray the actors involved the United States and Russia, in different ways in order to show the historical implications the stories had, and how it could be related back to that time period. Even though the stories had certain similarities like the actors involved and the time period it was based on, it also differed in the way the actors were portrayed and how they impacted the Cold war.
Lafeber, W. (2002), America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945-2000. 9th edn. New-York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
The Cold War (1945-1991) was a substantial war that was fought on an. economic, philosophical, cultural, social and political level. This impacted globally and changed the majority of the world’s societies to a. liberated fashion, rather than the archaic and conservative ways. Global war is a war engaged in by all if not most of the principle nations of the world, a prime example of such would be of the two great wars. Therefore the cold war can’t be classified as a global war in terms of the military and actual warfare’s, as the two superpowers (Soviet Union and USA) fought indirectly with each other, however to an extent the cold war can be said it’s a global war in terms of its politics and economics. The The effects of the Cold War were definitely felt globally and had an aftermath.
Colonel Filitov, Nikolay Gerasimov, and Colonel Golovko were some of the other main characters from the Soviet side. There were definitely good and bad characters, most of the Russians were bad but Filitov was good because he gave info on Soviet projects to the Americans. The main idea of the book was the race between the Americans and Soviets to build a Space Missile Defense program. One of the things I learned from the book was just how serious and dangerous it was to be committing treason to your country, especially when you’re giving info to the enemies. One of the main things I loved about the book was the intelligence and counter-intelligence that both countries were doing to each other.
In his 1962 speech which is highlighted in the film, President Kennedy calls the placing of missiles a threat of peace and offensive action taken by the Soviet Union. The filmmakers do not incorporate Khrushchev’s response, which blatantly states that the missiles are of a defensive nature and the Soviet Union wants a “peaceful coexistence” between the nations. It makes sense that the filmmakers would refrain from showing faults of President Kennedy and maintain the American perspective throughout the film to appeal to the American audience and refrain from detracting from the main plotline of the debates between advisors in the decision-making