All The Kings Horses Analysis

1272 Words3 Pages

In Kurt Vonnegut’s two short stories, ‘All the Kings Horses’ and ‘Manned Missiles’, he tried to reflect on the actual international backdrops of the time the stories were based on, in two different ways. While both stories reflected on the events that took place during the Cold War, the author managed to portray the actors involved the United States and Russia, in different ways in order to show the historical implications the stories had, and how it could be related back to that time period. Even though the stories had certain similarities like the actors involved and the time period it was based on, it also differed in the way the actors were portrayed and how they impacted the Cold war.
In the short story, ‘All the Kings Horses’ written …show more content…

However, the significant difference between the two stories would include how the two countries (specifically Russia) was portrayed in each story. For example, in the first story America’s communist adversaries, Russia and China were portrayed rather negatively. As we can see the plane crash landed in China, and the American survivors were held captive by Pi Ying and Major Barzov who was a Russian military figure. The author tried to show these characters as more villainous in order to reflect on the real life activities of the Communist countries at that time. However, in the second story we find the author portraying the Russian astronaut and the communication between the two fathers more positively. In this story he did not try to show Russia or its astronaut as negative figures, but rather tried to reflect on the situation at that time in a different light. Both stories are situated during the Cold War and reflect the events of that time. Historically, the Cold War was more political and was an ideological fight between the governments of the two great nations, but its effects were felt by the general people of the two countries, as well as other countries across the

Open Document