Hinds, Jennifer. Review of The Search for Order: 1877-1920. By Robert H. Wiebe. Commerce: Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2015.
In The Search of Order: 1877-1920, (Search for Order), by Robert H. Wiebe the author writes about finding the utopia. He writes for the constant need to have the best utopia possible but as the reader reads the book we find out that he never discovers the best utopia. Throughout history, Wiebe takes apart every aspect of something that went on in a period of time and analyzes it. There are some things that Wiebe does well and other parts he does not do as well in. This can throw the reader for a spin and not understand everything that Wiebe is trying to say.
From the beginning of the book we see that Wiebe can go
…show more content…
through different periods of history on the same page which he continues to do throughout the entire book. It reminds me of a schizophrenic piece of music that is leading up to something but never really gets there. On pages 62 of Search for Order Wiebe goes from talking about religion to the prohibition and then The Women’s Christian Temperance Union (62). That is all on one page! How can someone follow what Wiebe is talking about when he constantly jumps from one thing to another without giving each item a purpose and shows how it leads to the next thing? Wiebe should have noticed that when he was writing The Search for Order and his editor and publisher should have noticed that as well. One thing that Wiebe does well is he does talk about things that a lot of authors do not want to talk about.
Wiebe explains what The Knights of Labor are and explains what they did (67). He explains that The Knights of Labor were a group of people who “excluded men who had corrupted morals and those who manipulated money, for all honorable men, laborers ‘of the hand or of the brain,’ properly belonged to the healthy community.” (67) This process of excluding men has never seemed to work on all things but it does work on some things. Excluding men from some things makes room for competition between people which is not always a good thing because people are naturally competitive and want to be on top of whatever it is that they …show more content…
do. As Samuel P.
Hays says in his review of The Search for Order, “Many will recognize his views as a variation of community-society or local-cosmopolitan typology, well known in sociology but applicable to historical description.” Paul is saying that Wiebe has the ability to take what has happened in the past and sees that they have found the utopia of the time. However, as we find out every era of humanity tries to find the perfect utopia only to find out that there is not a perfect utopia. Paul also says that even though we may have not found the current utopia, throughout history many people thought that they have found it and let others know which is why Wiebe wrote about it in The Search for Order. This is something good that Wiebe has written about. He has taken the past experiences from other people and applied them to, at the time the book was written, the ability to find the utopia he was talking
about. Another thing Wiebe did not do well though was when he would talk about religion. He would talk about one sect of Christianity and not any other sect. Wiebe quoted Josiah Strong saying, “The Roman Catholic vote is more or less perfectly controlled by the priests.” (54) I find this offensive as being Roman Catholic myself I know that what Strong said is wrong. Yes, we may be influenced by the priests but you know what? So are the Protestants. When they elect someone to be their new pastor they have been influenced by their old pastor in the way he or she did things. Also, why did Wiebe only choose to briefly discuss this section of Christianity? He should have at least talked about others denominations and compared it to the Roman Catholicism. To me, Wiebe seems biased of all of the religions and there are only a select few that he likes and feels comfortable talking about. In chapter nine of The Search for Order Wiebe talks about the emergence of foreign policy to in which he states, “At its inception the heart of the nation’s new foreign policy concerned Latin America and East Asia, largely because these were the territories available for expansion.” (239) I can see how Wiebe was right about this because the United States of America buys a lot of goods from East Asia. The United States owes a lot of money to China and East Asia. With Latin America, we see a lot of illegal drugs coming through to America. Yes the United States is cracking down on it, but having the border patrol nine miles off the border is allowing the drugs to be brought into the United States and given the chance to actually make it to the rest of the United States. I know that the border patrol is off the border by nine miles because I am with the Texas States Guard and the President of the United States has called for troops to be pushed back nine miles. It is like Wiebe was predicting the future and knowing that the United States would be doing the things he said in his book. Overall, I would give The Search for Order: 1877-1920 by Robert H. Wiebe a half a star out of five stars because the book is hard to follow and Wiebe jumps around too much. Yes there are some great things about the book but it is not enough to outweigh what I do not like about it. Wiebe is always looking for the utopia but just when he thinks he found it something happens and he is looking again. There will never be a utopia because things are always changing and that is making history. The only utopia that there will ever be is if you are in heaven after you die. That is it. Here on earth there will never be utopia and that is something that I do not think that Wiebe understood because if he did he would have figured it out as he was writing the book. Jennifer Hinds Texas A&M University-Commerce
In all aspects a utopian society is a society that is place to achieve perfection, and that is the society that both the “Uglies”, by Scott Westfield and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, was striving for. In both of these stories, the government had control over the people’s choices, freedoms, and their natural abilities. Yet both government strive for a perfect society, the methods they use to achieve this goal were different from each other.
The authors therefor saw the ‘utopian’ societies to be a trap for weak minded publics, and that once in place, such systems would be able to perpetuate indefinitely due to the efficiency at which they protect and propagate themselves. Through fear, diversion and sedation the utopia can maintain a strong grip on the people it encompasses before anyone realizes the sacrifices made. The popularity of these books does rule out the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however. The state of people is not about to change, and their ignorance will continue regardless of the harshness of the wake up calls issued.
Utopia is a term invented by Sir Thomas More in 1515. However, he traces the root two Greek words outopia and eutopia which means a place does not exist and a fantasy, invention. It is widely accepted that Plato was to first to picture a utopian order. In his masterpiece, “Republic”, he formed the principles of ideal commonsense and his utopia (Hertzler, 1922:7). After the classical age, Sir Thomas More assumed to be the first of the utopian writers in early modern period. As a humanist, he gave the world in his “Utopia” a vision of a perfect communistic commonwealth (the history of utopian thought). Utopia’s influence on contemporary and rival scholars is so deep that it has given its name to whole class of literature. Following the appearance of More’s Utopia, there was a lack of Utopian literature for nearly a century (Hertzler, 1922:7). This period ended with the works of Francis Bacon, Campanelle and Harrington. These early modern utopians, being the children of Renaissance, filled with a love of knowledge and high respect for the newly truths of science. Thus, they believed that the common attainment of knowledge means the largest participation of all members of society in its joys and benefits. After the period of early Utopians, continuation of a sprit of French Revolution and initial signs of industrial revolution resulted in the emergence of a new group of Utopians called Socialist Utopians (Hertzler, 1922: 181). The word “Socialism” seems to have been first used by one of the leading Utopian Socialists, St Simon. In politics utopia is a desire that never come true neither now nor afterwards, a wish that is not based on social forces (material conditions and production) and is not supported by the growth and development of political, class forces. This paper discusses the validity of this claim, tries to present and evaluate the political reforms, if any, offered by Socialist Utopians.
What would happen if an utopia wasn’t all that perfect on the inside? Judging by just the appearance of something may lead to a situation of regret and confusion.” The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson address the theme of religious and traditional symbolism.” The Lottery” demonstrates how something that seems so perfect on the outside isn’t all that great on the inside.
This argument is supported by the unique position of the narrator they are not an “’objective’ observer” but instead “She is an entrapped cinematographer” (8). The narrator portrays a world through a biased voice making it seem that much more splendid and magnificent. After finishing the description of the utopia, the narrator switches to first person and begins asking questions directed at the audience about the town. These questions “pose real ethical, linguistic, and perceptual problems involved in describing and conceptualizing utopia during the last 20th century” (Roemer 8). By allowing the audience to build the town the narrator allows for the “justification for the brevity and vagueness of the narrative” (Roemer 10). The narrator is made to look even more unreliable by her word choice and “admits her ignorance about many aspects of the Omelas system” (Roemer 10). By using this kind of narrative voice the story becomes more believable and offers a change from previous utopian works it is not offers “a memorable encounter with a modern utopian text” but also causes the audience to become part of “the creation of utopias that may involve unexpected moral responsibilities” (Roemer
...nce our perceptions on reality and the concept of a utopian society. The connection between our own society and elements of the novel enable readers to recognize that although a literal utopian society is not possible, the closest we can come to perfection is to find a balance between what is and what we can imagine.
The definition of Utopia is, “an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.” The rules and controls listed above and the many more that are in the book “Anthem” describe a society trying to become collective but in a utopian way. The purpose of these rules and controls is to keep the society collectivist. Fear is what runs this society. “.
Sklar, Robert. “The Golden Age or Turbulence And The Golden Age of Order.” Movie-Made America. New York: Random House, 1975. 175-194. Print.
A “utopia is that which is in contradiction with reality,” said the famous French novelist Albert Camus in his collection of essays, Between Hell and Reason. History shows us that seemingly exemplary ideals in practice have led to the collapse of societies. Just examine the two most prominent attempts at a utopia: Hitler’s attempt to socialize all of Europe and create the “perfect” Aryan race coupled with Karl Marx’s beliefs to instate communism into society. The final result was the destruction of their perspective visionary worlds. There was one major facet that prevented these two from creating their paradigms: utopias take away individual freedom and identity and therefore society cannot exist. Aldous Huxley’s science fiction novel Brave New World examines the large disconnect between the future and present day societies, showing how several aspects of this dystopian world lead to the downfall of the individual identity, most prominently exemplified by the death of John Savage.
1900-1930," Journal of American History; June 1996, Vol. 83 Issue 1 Web. 26 May 2015.
...e of reality, seizes the pleasures in their lives and portrays a loss of freedom. Both their perfect worlds were full of lies and instead of shielding its inhabitants from evil they gave individuals no rights of their own. What appeared in the beginning as a perfect utopian society was actually an imperfect dystopian environment.
Revolutions and civil wars have taken place and totalitarianism has become a fact that can hardly be ignored. Therefore, the modern age has become a time in which more anti-utopias have been envisioned than ever before. A lot of authors have expressed their views on utopia in their novels. Some have done it by creating their own perfect world, while others have chosen a different path. They have been selected to voice their opinions in anti-utopian novels, or dystopia.
More, Sir Thomas. "Utopia." The Longman Anthology of British Literature. Vol 1. Ed. David Damrosch. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc., 1999. 637-706.
The book "Utopia", was written by Thomas More in 1516. The book provided many details of how society was wrong, according to Thomas More. In the first part he describes the problems with the 16th century's society. The following sections are More's ideas of a perfect society in an island. The ideas are common welfare vs. private interest, uniformity and dissent, civic virtue and the moral education of citizens, and exploration through philosophy and travel. Thomas More's book, Utopia, is from the mind of Thomas More that tells his view on a perfect world and how it would fit in with 16th century society.
Because they are described in a detailed manner, the Utopia book itself seems to be enough to be a blueprint for the future. However, Thomas More clearly stated that he just wishes Europeans to follow some good qualities of the Utopian society—“there are many things in the Utopian commonwealth that in our own societies I would wish rather than expect to see” (97)—because he himself knows that it is impossible for any country to be like Utopia. This is apparent, because Utopia is possible on the premise that every factor comes together to create this ideal society. Even the geography has to contribute to this premise, as Hythloday explains the geography of Utopia as the place where strangers cannot enter without one of them (39). Moreover, from diligent and compassionate Utopians’ characteristics and their ways of life, they seem to be successful in reaching the fullest of every aspect of their life including physical, intellectual, social, spiritual, and emotional, when it is hardly possible to even have one person like that in real life.