Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing books and movies
Comparing books and movies
Comparing books and movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing books and movies
Watching the movie before a book is a little weird. Most think the book has the mistakes until they look it up.The Rikki-Tikki-Tavi story and short film’s differences are hard to spot. Unless looking at the story as a whole, finding the differences would be hard. The story is based off a mongoose being found by a family, who then saves the family from two cobras living in their garden. Not much could change between a simple fight like the one the antagonists and protagonists fight. Looking over the whole plot contains some of the three main factors of the actual story, first reviewing the conflict, or what caused the plot of the story, the climax, and the falling action-resolution. Next would be the film’s conflict, climax, and resolution. Looking at all of those will give a general idea …show more content…
of how different the film is from the story. During the story’s rising conflict Rikki is washed away from his family, and found by a family who takes him to his house. After being aroused, Rikki explores the family’s garden, to which he encounters the story’s main anti-protagonists, which are cobras by the name of Nag and Nagaina. The only reason Rikki encounters the cobras is because he hears the weeping of a bird family whose child had been devoured by Nag. Later in the night, Nag attempts to slay the family in the bungalow, Luckily, Rikki is there to save them, but even though he killed Nag, Nag’s death is illusioned to look like the father in the bungalow killed him with a gun. Nag is later described as “two pieces”. Darzee, who was the husband of the bird family, rejoiced by singing a victory song, which isn’t in detail. Rikki knew he now had to deal with Nagaina. But Nagaina wanted revenge on the bungalow family because she thought the man had killed Nag. earlier on in the story, Nagaina mentions her eggs are almost ready to hatch, so, currently, Rikki is trying to lead Nagaina away from the family by using the previously mentioned bird family’s wife to lead her away. The eggs are almost hatched, so Rikki smashes all but one, to trick Nagaina. Nagaina falls for the trick and ends up not killing the family, and later on is killed by Rikki in her own rat hole. During the movie’s rising conflict Rikki is washed away from his burrow, and found by the bungalow family, who take him back to the bungalow.
Some small differences were what Rikki ate throughout the start of the movie and the bathroom scene. At the start, instead of meat Rikki eats a banana, which he eats later in the story. While the bungalow family’s son is taking a bath, rikki explores the bathroom, which he did in the book. Rikki, in the film, seemed to explore the bathroom a lot more in the movie. Rikki even checked out the bath itself. Rikki decides to explore the bungalow and confronts the bird family, who seem to be afraid of Nag, but no details are given if they ever even had a child to begin with, The encounter with Nag is basically the same. During the movie, the man doesn’t shoot Nag after Rikki kills him, so Nag doesn’t end up as “two pieces”. Darzee’s victory song, this time, is given a whole minute of singing. The book never had the lyrics in the story, but where show in a separate page. The Nagaina knows Rikki killed Nag, so she decides to take revenge on him by killing the bungalow family. Rikki tricks Nagaina the same way, and they go back to the same rat
hole. There will always be small differences, because each person has their own version of the story they want to tell. For example, a director would maybe want this or that detail switched. Overall, in the Rikki-Tikki-Tavi story, not much is changed. In the rising conflict, not much is changed, just what is seeming to be a lack of detail about Darzee, and some more details in the bungalow. In the conflict, a pretty major part of the how the story went changed, in the story Rikki kills Nag, but the man from the bungalow family shoots Nag, so the situation looks like the man killed Nag. In the movie, the man doesn’t shoot Nag at all. The conclusion is basically the same. So overall, whoever did the movie of Rikki-Tikki-Tavi made it really close to the story.
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
Many people assume that the book and movie of the same story are always very similar, but they are incorrect. In my comparison of the short story Rikki-tikki-tavi by Rudyard Kipling and the movie of Rikki-tikki-tavi, I found them to be rather different. There were many minor differences, but the three main topics in the short story that clearly differentiate it from the movie are the setting, the character traits, and the use of humor.
The book Hoot and the movie Hoot are very alike and very different. Some people like them both but some people only like one, or neither.
...d coloring of certain images. The novel, however, puts much greater emphasis on the imagination and creativity, and on the main character Tita. The novel really makes the reader feel Titas pain and grow with her as she discovers her freedom, whereas the movie failed to achieve this. Moreover, the movie tends to ignore the significant of 3 integral motifs, cooking, tears and sensuality.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
One difference from the movie is the way Maxwell and Freak meet each other. In the original novel, Maxwell meets Freak when they were younger, in a daycare. However, in the movie Freak moves into Maxwell’s town and moves beside him. Though that may be the same, the movie makes this scene the first time Maxwell and Freak ever meet each other. Also, in the book, it has details on when Kevin (or Freak) moved into the town. Such as what he said, did, and reacted. While in the movie, this scene is completely cut out and forgotten.
As you can all see the movie for once is actually better than the book in showing the
Though the events and a lot of the dialogue are the same in both the book and the movie the crux of the two are completely different. The book focuses a lot more on sexual tension and sexual exploration. The...
When you get to the beginning, middle, or end u realize they are both very different. The movie and book have a lot in common like they both have the same characters .
The initial difference between the novel and the film is the main character. In the novel, the story is told through the eyes of the narrator, Chief Bromden. Chief Bromden is the main character and “the most fully developed character in the novel.” (Beetz 3089) The Chief is a supposedly deaf-mute, half-breed Indian who is a very large and powerful man. He is a paranoid-schizophrenic who has been a Chronic patient on the ward for fifteen years. He is known as “Chief Broom,” because he is constantly pushing a broom around the ward. From the beginning, the reader...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The plot in the film is very similar to the book but in parts, especially towards the end, the plot is slightly different to the film. The plot is varied in the film to show
The first change in the film in comparison to the novel is the opening scene. In the novel it starts with George and Lennie arriving at a pond and carelessly drinking stagnant water. However in the film it opens with Curleys Wife running as well as George and Lennie running from a lynching party chasing them out of the ranch in Weed. In the novel this is explained later rather than at the start
The book, "Being There," is about a man named Chance, who is forced to move out of the house he lived in his whole life and his experience in the outside world. Based on the success of the book, the movie, "Being There," was made. The author of the book, Jerzy Kosinski, also wrote the screenplay for the movie. I think the major difference between the book and the movie is that in the book, we get to read what Chance is feeling and thinking, but in the movie, we only get to see his actions.
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.