Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critiques of the taming of the shrew
Critiques of the taming of the shrew
Analysis of taming of the shrew
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critiques of the taming of the shrew
“What goes around, comes around,” is a famous saying that states that everything a person does will eventually come back to them. This is true when observing the relations between people. When one person acts kindly to another, the other party usually acts in a similar fashion; like talking to a mirror. This also works the other way around when mistreating someone, they're inclined to the same. An example of this quote is shown in William Shakespeare's The Taming of The Shrew. Katherine Minola terrorizes the people of Padua which in turn, is terrorized by Petruchio for her actions. Kate deserves firm discipline because she needs it in more ways than one. Kate is not a regular person and normal ways of communicating with her will not work; she is much like a stubborn child. For her sake and the rest of Padua, Petuchio's actions is for the better because the way her abusive means of communication were unacceptable. Lastly, unbeknownst to most people, the taming she received brought her a blessing in the end which justifies Petruchio's actions.
The way Kate was acts resembles that of a stubborn child. She is a shrew; a selfish, ill-tempered woman who is inconsiderate to those around her. When Kate and Petruchio first meet, Petruchio sends her way an exorbitant amount of compliments which she promptly replies with, “Moved!, In good time: let him that moved as you hither. Remove you hence. I knew at the first you were a movable.” (Act II, Scene 1, Line 215-218) Kate immediately insults Petruchio and dismisses the fact that Petruchio is probably the first man to compliment her in such a way. This shows that she is not even willing to have a civil conversation with someone she's just met. If a person gives out a compliment in the real...
... middle of paper ...
...in cuts and bruises. During this scene, Kate is able to maintain her cool and disregard the widow's words. Petruchio's firm disciplinary actions unto Kate were not only deserved but justified because she finds some benefit out of it.
So as you can see, Kate did deserve the disciplinary action of Petruchio. Without it, she would not have changed and remain to her old and unacceptable ways. She would not have had learned how to properly deal with people and lastly, she would not have received the appreciation that she definitely needed. Change is very hard but it is the only way to explore life. Without broadening your scope, your mind is closed off on the other ways of living. You may never learn of what is best for you if you do not change. “Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” - George Bernard Shaw
Obedience has always been a trait present in every aspect of society. Parents have practiced enforcing discipline in their homes where children learn obedience from age one. Instructors have found it difficult to teach a lesson unless their students submit to their authority. Even after the adolescent years, law enforcement officers and governmental officials have expected citizens to uphold the law and abide by the standards set in society. Few will understand, however, that although these requirements for obedience provide positive results for development, there are also dangers to enforcing this important trait. Obedience to authority can be either profitable or perilous depending on who the individual in command is. In the film, The Crucible,
?What is left when honor is lost?? Publilius Syrus' quote, though dating from 100 B.C., still seems pertinent to our era (Quotations). Many people still feel that once integrity is lost they are nothing and many are willing to stand up to keep their integrity. Without integrity, we are nothing. During the time that Arthur Miller wrote his most famous play, The Crucible, innocent men and women are accused of having Communist leanings. Their whole lives are ruined in a short amount of time because they refuse to compromise themselves by selling out their friends. Miller tries to make a statement about these unfair trials by comparing them to the Salem witch-hunts and trials of 1692. The main protagonist of his play is a man named John Proctor who is accused of witchcraft but stands up to maintain his name and his honor, even though he is hanged for it. During the H.U.A.C. trials some took stands for their beliefs with the knowledge of possibly being shunned by society. Knowing this, instead of taking the cowards' way and giving the names of their friends, they refuse to tell the committee anything in the same way that John Proctor stands up against a court that is ruining the lives of innocent people.
In the Crucible, we are introduced to the main protagonist John Proctor; the way that Arthur Miller presents him by rebelling against the authority in Salem. Out of the entire town he is the only person that speaks out, realising that the authority is unfair and unjust; he is not like everyone else in the town who keeps quiet to themselves. There are many situations where we the readers can see very clear examples of him rebelling against the authority that controlled Salem. One example of Proctor rebelling against authority in Salem was when he did not go to church on a Sabbath day and instead decided to pray in his own home ‘Mr Proctor, your house is not a church; your theology must tell you that’. That is one clear example of him rebelling
Isn't it very possible that Kate is actually in control of all her decisions, but is just strongly influenced by others? After studying the text in-depth, you can see for yourself that although Kate is strongly influenced by others, she is the one who actually makes the decisions to act in the manner in which she acts. As stated, although Kate, in many instances, appears to be controlled by others, she is actually in control of her actions. She is the one who does everything, such as allowing herself to be married to Petruchio. Some people may say that she was forced to marry Petruchio, but she could have just run away if she really hadn't wanted to marry him.
As the adolescents wail in their pretentious horror of a fictional bird, Proctor slowly realizes the conformation that Satan has entered Salem. Arthur Miller’s tragic allegory, The Crucible, shows the destruction of sinister Salem in 1692. The protagonist, John Proctor, a damnable farmer, has a lecherous affair with the antagonist, Abigail Williams, an ignorant and covetous juvenile. Satan mixes their interior motives to manufacture a catastrophic concoction. The ingredients of destruction consist of selfishness, immaturity, and corruption. The voracious desires of the natives of Salem lead to their evil and self-indulged intentions.
The power of religion and fear is prominently displayed throughout The Crucible; the characters holding power of the court misuse it, and the motives of credible, honest, worthwhile characters are lost to lies and deceit. Out of all the characters in The Crucible, John Proctor and Reverend Hale are the most deserving of authority but receive very little, if any. The majority of the power is distributed between Danforth, Hathorne, Parris, and Abigail. The power and ability to decide innocence and guilt is given to those who can ask questions while evading answering any.
Her personality is strong and she is independent, unlike most women. This makes her unattractive to most suitors and gains her the label of shrew. She demonstrates her personality in the beginning of the play: "I pray you sir, is it your will to make a stale of me amongst these mates?" (1.1 57-58). Shakespeare uses the characterization of Kate to demonstrate the defiance against traditional gender roles and how Kate almost immediately speaks out for herself, unlike her sister Bianca. In addition, Kate describes her future husband as a "mate," unlike how most women would describe their lovers. Moreover, Kate is educated: "I 'faith, sir, you shall never need to fear: I wis it is not half way to her heart; But if it were, doubt not her care should be to comb your noodle with a three-legg 'd stool and paint your face and use you like a fool." (1.1 61-65). Shakespeare uses the characterization of Kate to demonstrate how she defies traditional gender roles by being the only person to speak in iambic pentameter. This demonstrates her intelligence unlike many women. In addition, Kate doesn 't enjoy receiving orders from others. When her father leaves with Bianca and tells Kate she may stay, she gets angry. "Why, and I trust I may go too, may I not? What, shall I be appointed hours; as though, belike, I knew not what to take and what to leave, ha? (1.1 103-105). Shakespeare uses the characterization of Kate to
Women’s rights are a household topic that has been around for the better part of the last century in America, however back when the play was written, women’s rights were unheard of. So when Petruchio didn’t let Kate eat or sleep after they eloped (IV.iii.47-48) “The poorest service is repaid with thanks, and so shall mine before you touch the meat.” Petruchio is controlling everything that Kate is doing, which includes whether she eats or not which is sexist nowadays, but back in the 16th century, it was normal behavior. Petruchio could possibly just be trying to get his woman the best food possible, or in the case of his wedding, the best tailored clothes for Kate. Petruchio brings in a tailor for his wedding, and when the dress doesn’t live up to his expectations, he lets the tailor know (IV.iii.113-121) “O monstrous arrogance!... that thou hast marred her gown.” Petruchio cares so much about getting everything for his wife to be perfect that he does not let one thing fall out of line for his wedding preparations. These things could be taken as sexist acts; however they were just acts...
In The Taming of the Shrew, the concept of love is a means of emotional manipulation, and manipulation is nothing more than a means of control between men and women. William Shakespeare critiques the patriarchal social structure by ironically employing the manipulative stance Petruchio takes towards winning Katherine as his wife by charming her with words and manipulating her psychologically, and then taming her after their marriage through legal, physical, financial, and psychological control and manipulation. Though Petruchio may think he yields power over his wife, Katherine uses obedience as a tool of manipulation and has the control of the household, as can be seen by her ironic speech at the end of the play, where she claims women must serve their men. Shakespeare uses the irony of a man using manipulation as a tool for control to magnify the significance of the power women yield through manipulation, thus proving that men and women engage in a power-shifting struggle.
In Shakespeare's comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare has a woman as one of the story's main characters. Katherine Minola (Kate) is off the wall, and kinda crazy. Because of her actions, the “male centered world” around her doesn't know what to do with her. In the beginning, a lot of what we learn about Kate comes from what other people say about her. In Act I, she is only seen briefly and she speaks even less, but our picture of Kate is pretty clear.
Kate never finds out that Petruchio was paid to marry her. Petruchio and Patrick both use deceitful tactics in order to be with their respective loves. They disguise their true feelings and motives for being with their girl. Both Kat and Katherine fall in love with the man who was paid to be with her.
A Shakespearean scholar expanded on this, “The play enacts the defeat of the threat of a woman’s revolt; it does so in a comic form – thus so offers the audience the chance to revel in and reinforce their misogyny while at the same time feeling good” (Gay). The Taming of the Shrew at many points is just praising the men in the novel despite their behavior and putting down the women for being anything but perfect. The novel makes the actions happening comedic and the reader does not get upset at the things happening, but in reading further into it and comparing it to modern day, it is not hard to see the plain and simple abuse. Although gender roles are still prominent in today’s society, they are toned back. In contemporary versions of The Taming of The Shrew, such as 10 Things I Hate About You and Kiss Me Kate, the character Kate is always mitigated.
is otherwise known as Kate. At her first entrance in Act 1 Scene 1 she
Throughout Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare portrayed women as objects or shrews that needed to be tamed. Kate was the daughter of a wealthy man named Baptista Minolta from Padua. She was the oldest sister and, under tradition of the time, had to be married first. Bianca, on the other hand, was the younger daughter and was courted by many. Due to Kate’s wild behavior, the suitors were afraid of her. Along came a man named Petruccio, who was determined to marry her and get the money that would be given to the man who marries her. Through Petruccio, Shakespeare exploited women.
When the character of Kate is first introduced, Hortensio compares her to a devil and says that no matter how much money she may have, no one would ever want to marry her. She is treated poorly because she does not fit the standards set by others (Shrew). I identify with her because I also feel judged by others. I feel like no matter how smart, helpful, and nice I am, I will always be less because I do not fit the mold set by others. My sister, on the other hand, fits the mold at first glance. Her room is almost always ready for company to come over and walk into. She is a social butterfly who tries to look like a magazine ad in every aspect. My room always has and always will reflect me as a person. I have artwork covering the walls and music and playbills on my bulletin board. Even if I were organized, they would still be in there. My room looks like a human lives in it and my sister’s looks like she is waiting for a camera crew to walk in and start filming. If my room were cleaner than hers, people would still choose hers over mine because her room is generic enough that other people would feel cozy enough that they would be willing to spend time in it, but it is cute enough that you feel like the atmosphere is one of a trendy person’s room. My room feels too much like me even when it is clean. “Why do you have so many painting on your wall? Can’t you get rid of at least a few of these books? Why don’t you get new bedding? This one seems outdated.” I do not care that it is not what that person would put in their room. It is my room and I do not care what others think looks best. I try to make things in life easier for me so that I can do more things in my day. In my current messy state, my room is set up so that my life can be quicker and easier for me. I keep the shirt I know I need to wear in two days sitting on my desk chair so I can easily grab it and go. I have my