Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greed in literature essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greed in literature essay
Consequence of Greed “We are in danger of destroying ourselves by our greed and stupidity. We cannot remain looking inwards at ourselves on a small and increasingly polluted and overcrowded planet” (Stephan Hawking). Just as Stephan Hawking illustrates, Norma, the main character in the short story, “Button, Button” by Richard Matheson learns what will happen when she is selfish. For instance, Norma has the option of whether or not to press the button. However, in the end, Norma finds out the hard way by letting her greed surpass her common sense. As a result, she demonstrates egotistical behavior. Consequently, Matheson utilizes the conflict and irony in order to develop his theme: people tend to be so greedy and self absorbed that they tend …show more content…
to be oblivious to their surroundings. In the beginning of the story, Matheson portrays Norma as being greedy when asked about the offer.
As a matter of fact, when Norma is discussing the deal with her husband, Arthur, she remarks, “‘Fifty thousand dollars, Arthur.’‘Fifty thousand dollars, Arthur,’ Norma interrupted. ‘A chance to take that trip to Europe we’ve always talked about’” (Matheson 21). Because Norma mentions the trip to Europe, it suggests that she wants Arthur to agree with her, in an attempt to make herself seem less selfish. Also, because she constantly mentions the amount of money they will receive with a push of a button, it reveals her greed; for instance, she will let a child die rather than give up the fifty thousand dollars she does not have. Furthermore, the author inserts Norma’s contemplation in order to reveal that people tend to let greed get the best of them. All in all, Matheson portrays Norma as being greedy when asked about the offer towards the beginning of the …show more content…
story. However, as a consequence of Norma’s greed, a conflict emerges; she decides to press the button that will end someone’s life. In fact, as Norma is pushing the button, she reveals, “How ridiculous, she thought. All this over a meaningless button. Reaching out, she pressed it down. For us, she thought angrily” (Matheson 24). Since Norma expresses how she is pressing the button for Arthur and herself, it presumes that she is willing to risk someone’s life in order to receive a check. As a matter of fact, Norma is so consumed by her curiosity and desire that she makes the impulsive decision to press the button. Furthermore, because Norma presses the button, it reveals that she favors wealth over the people dearest to her. Thus, Norma’s greed causes a conflict to arise. Towards the end of the story, Norma discovers who the “random” person she kills is through an ironic twist.
For instance, once Norma presses the button and begins to believe it truly has no power, she receives a call from the Lennox Hospital informing her that her husband died; she then calls Mr. Steward and exclaims, “‘You said I wouldn’t know the one that died!’... Mr. Steward said, ‘do you really think you knew your husband?’” (Matheson 25). Because Mr. Steward asks Norma if she really knows her husband, it suggests that Norma’s egotistical personality causes her to be incognizant of her surroundings. The author composes this choice in the plot in order to manifest the concept that greed can cause a person to be desperate enough to make irrational decisions. Moreover, Norma’s recklessness reveals her inability to formulate logical decisions. In the end, Norma’s decision costs her her husband’s
life. Therefore, through the conflict and irony, this story reveals that with greed and an egotistical personality, people tend to be blind to their surroundings. Norma demonstrates to readers that with a self absorbed attitude, people tend to be oblivious to their surroundings. Furthermore, Norma also demonstrates the consequence of greed. For example, rather than giving up the money, she chooses to push the button: as a result, it costs her her husband’s life. When a person lets their greed and egotistical behavior surpass their common sense, people tend to be oblivious to their surroundings.
Mrs. Mallard’s husband is thought to be dead, and since she has that thought in her mind she goes through many feelings
Money can cause people to act selfish and arrogant, especially when they have so much money they do noteven know what to spend it on. In the novel,
The consequences of selfishness are seen to be so dramatic and devastating, that an audience can’t help but be
The Misfit was no exception to her ways of manipulation but her efforts came up short. Her actions, in many ways, could be compared to species of prey as they use their unique characteristics to elude the grasp of their predators. Just as the speed of the gazelle against the strength of the lion, the grandmother’s intelligence could be compared to the Misfit’s need for vengeance. When some people can see death coming, they will do anything in their power to avoid it. The grandmother knew who she was dealing with as soon as she saw the Misfit’s face. Yet, she tried to fool herself into believing that her sure fate could have been changed by her own actions. It is hard to say that her actions were just out of manipulation. T...
These characters, however different they lie on the morality scale, all share the sinful trait of greed. They all ask, and take too much, ruining what the good that they had in their lives. Understanding their mistakes offers its useful readers a lesson, not to demand too much of the things we are offered. The characters struggle with their desires, each of them succombing to their passions.
Once examining the story I found an interesting insight on Mrs. Mallard in terms of acts and happenings; the happenings (a change of state not brought about by an agent and manifested in the discourse in the act of happen) are events out of Mrs. Mallards control, and the acts (a change of state brought about by an agent) are Mrs. Mallards emotional realizations and her change of outlook on life and death rather than physical actions: Mr.
In conclusion, it was no surprise when Mrs. Mallard is shocked when her husband is standing at their front door. He had missed his train; therefore, sparing his life. When she is making her symbolic descent down the stairs, she spots her husband and realizes that she can never reverse her progress. The “joy” that kills her is the joy that she refuses to surrender, but for one hour she gets glimpse of what true joy is (Jamil 219).
Throughout the narrative, the text utilizes the conflict over the crisis of cognition, or the very mystery regarding the Marquise’s lack of knowledge surrounding her mysterious pregnancy, as a catalyst for the presentation of the plurality of opinions associated with the Marquise’s current status in society and presumptions to the father’s identity. In itself, this state of cognitive dissonance prevents the Marquise from making any attempts at atoning for her supposed sin, as she herself is unaware of any possible transgressions responsible for her current predicament. In turn, this separation from the truth pushes the marquise to fall into the conviction that the “incomprehensible change[s] in her figure” and “inner sensations” (85) she felt were due to the god of Fantasy or Morpheus or even “one of his attendant dreams,” (74) thereby relinquishing her subconscious from any guilt. However, despite her self-assurance of innocence and desperate pleas at expressing her clear conscience, the marquise becomes subject to external pressures from both her family and society, who come to perc...
Upon reading more closely, the story is revealed to present a tragic journey of a man who has lost his sanity but seeks solace in the materialistic comforts of his old life. The story succeeds in making a number of statements about human nature: that wealth is the most powerful measure of social status and anyone without it will face ostracization; that denial of one 's mistakes and unfortunate circumstances only leads to more pain; that even the most optimistic people can hold dark secrets and emotional turmoil inside them. All of these themes compel the reader to ponder their real-life implications long after the story is
Button,Button is a short story by Richard Matheson about greed and selfishness. In the story there are three characters Mr. Steward, Arthur and Norma. Mr. Steward delivers the package which contains the button and he tries to convince Norma to press the button. She becomes curious and greedy wanting to kill someone for 50 thousand dollars while Arthur completely neglects the thought of pressing the button. They both try to convince each other but it doesn’t work and when Arthur sees that Norma is willing to press the button he becomes deeply depressed and commits suicide in turn giving Norma 50 thousand dollars in life insurance money. Arthur and Norma both have very different values and beliefs as Norma believes that it is okay to press the
As Lady Audley is examined, the doctor finds “no evidence of madness in anything that she has done” (Braddon 321) because all of Lady Audley’s actions in her life have been for a reason. Freud states that “when an idea immediately produces lively somatic consequences, this implies that…it flows off into the paths concerned in these consequences” (Freud 1936, 224), explaining that it is the ego of Lady Audley that is weighing her options of how to gain the status and wealth that she yearns for. Lady Audley’s upbringing has changed her ego into a cunning and calculating machine because her constant desires have impacted her decision-making process. She employs the challenges she has experienced and channels them into intelligence and ways that can advance her in society. She finds a happy medium within her superego and id by having “the cunning of madness, with the prudence of intelligence” (Braddon 323), which symbolizes her ego throughout the story. As a woman with this ability, “she is dangerous” (Braddon 323) because no other woman has presented these qualities, meaning it would be harmful to the power and control of men. Even though “there is a splitting of the mind into two
His untimely demise makes her eligible to claim fifty thousand dollars in life insurance as per the policy the couple had established with their insurance company. Within the narrative of “Button, Button” by Richard Matheson, Norma Lewis demonstrates the qualities of self-absorption and inquisitiveness, shaping her into a morally ambiguous character. Hence, it is vital that one keeps in mind that greed is a dangerous quality and can push one to do vile things if one does not exercise caution. To begin, throughout the story, the actions and decisions of Norma Lewis reveal distinct indicators of her self-absorption and egocentricity, rendering her an ethically ambiguous character. Her competitiveness quickly proves to be capable of clouding her thoughts and prompting her to commit unscrupulous acts.
Mallard’s emotions over the presumed death of her husband. The author used both dramatic and situational irony to mislead the reader and surprise them with a plot twist ending. By utilizing both external and internal conflict the author expresses the internal debate of Mrs. Mallard’s true feelings and those of the people around her. The author used symbolism to display Mrs. Mallard’s desire for freedom from her marriage. In the end it was not joy that killed Mrs. Mallard but the realization that she lost her
Imagine what our world would be like without governments, religion and possessions. John Lennon’s song “Imagine” reflects on the world we live in and who we are as people. John Lennon's song creates a feeling that’s unthinkable. Lenon’s masterpiece is visionary and pure genius. It may come across as simple words, but each word has a remarkable meaning behind it. Lennon was asking the world to imagine a place where things that divide people (anything from religion to possessions) did not exist.
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.