Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Richard III
Richard III character analysis
Shakespeare use of language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this passage from Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard progresses his plot further into acquiring the ultimate royal sovereignty. He has rid himself from the burden of Hastings, which brings him closer to achieve his goal. Richard states all wrongdoings of Edward, and sends Buckingham to spread rumors among the citizens. He then orders Lovell to gather allies, and he himself plans to get rid of Clarence’s children and ensure that no one can contact the princes locked up in the tower. Here, Richard is shown as a master of manipulation. Nothing would get in the way of him obtaining the crown, even if it means betraying his family. Richard’s villainy and his manipulation skills are reflected by Buckingham and Lovell’s loyalty and also his diction …show more content…
in this passage. This passage explicitly shows Richard’s clever use of structure and literary devices to convey his messages to the other characters, and the audience. He uses enumeration, listing the details of how unfair King Edward is to his subjects, and how he is idly abusing his power.
Richard asks Buckingham to exaggerate Edward’s bad side to the citizens, including how Edward has seduced “their servants, daughters, wives,” in line 82, the asyndeton used here implies that this is only a fragment of what Richard has to say, which means that Edward has done more than what is listed, much more horrific than what Richard may fathom. Richard also uses personification, like “raging eyes” and “savage heart” in line 83 to indicate that Edward was brutal, and dehumanizing him, merely just a beast seeking “a prey”. Richard’s diction creates a visual imagery, putting on a false persona to criticize Edward, claiming that the citizens should know the ‘truth’. He turns himself from a man who is betraying his own brother, to a man who sympathizes with the citizens. He also claims that Edward is illegitimate in line 86 to 90: “Tell them, when that my mother went with child/ Of that insatiate Edward, noble York, My princely father, then had wars in France, And by true computation of the time/ Found that the issue was not his begot”. These lines indicate the extreme measures Richard is willing to take to lead himself into power. He is destroying the images and …show more content…
reputations of his family to become King by all means. This clause portrays Richard’s skills to manipulate people and persuade them; making false allegations to paint King Edward as a corrupted king.
The dramatic irony is very clear to the audience, as he has already established himself the actual villain who does not consider the inputs of others. In line 95 to 97, Buckingham replies to Richard’s controversial orders reply for Richard's order: “Doubt not, my Lord, I’ll play the orator/ As if the golden fee for which I plead/ Were for myself. And so, my Lord, adieu.” This particular response shows his loyalty to Richard by using anaphora to repeat the word “lord” twice. This can be further interpreted as Buckingham establishing himself as a close ally to Richard. In addition, Richard also speaks to Lovell in a demanding tone. He uses anaphora in the lines from 103-104, “Go, Lovell, with all speed to Doctor Shaw. Go thou to Friar Penker. Bid them both” creates a visual imagery of Richard being in power and commanding Lovell. This reveals Richard’s control over his allies, as Lovell exits without bearing any questions or explanations, proving Richard’s true villainy. After Lovell leaves, Richard reveals his future plan to the audience through his soliloquy. Richard belittles the children of Clarence and
calls them “the brats of Clarence”, showing that Richard doesn't really care about them and hates them. He is reducing them to nothing but brats. In contrast, Richard calls the children of Edward “the princes”, which is much more appropriate than how he addresses the children of Clarence. This indicates Richard envies the power the princes were born with since they don’t have to go through the troubles to plan out evil plans and ponder upon betrayal. This makes them undeserving in Richard’s eyes. This also reveals Richard’s villainy since the princes and Clarence’s children are all innocent, and the fact that he would betray and harm them only for power shows his selfishness, Through these sentences, Richard foreshadows the future plot line as he speaks out his plan. Richard uses the power of language to establish his plan; he betrayed his brother, his nephews and even his own mother just for the throne and it's power, revealing his villainy and his manipulating talent with his diction. This passage reflects the evil characteristics of Richard and indicates how the plan Richard has will affect his plot. This passage also brings the overall theme of “betrayal” in his clause, as he is betraying his family as his scheme progresses. If Richard had chosen another way to fight for power without betraying everyone, maybe he would not end up being abandoned by everyone, and prove victim to Margaret’s supernatural cursing power. Unfortunately, he is a heartless man, and his destructive schemes continue. He may have ended up with a pitiful ending but that is what he deserves.
I feel that Richard gains our sympathy when he resigns the crown, refuses to read the paper that highlights his crimes, and smashes the mirror, which represents his vanity. In terms of kingship, I interpret the play as an exploration between the contrast with aristocratic pride in the law and the king's omnipotent powers. It also shows the chain reaction on kingship as past events in history determine present
Shakespeare constructs King Richard III to perform his contextual agenda, or to perpetrate political propaganda in the light of a historical power struggle, mirroring the political concerns of his era through his adaptation and selection of source material. Shakespeare’s influences include Thomas More’s The History of King Richard the Third, both constructing a certain historical perspective of the play. The negative perspective of Richard III’s character is a perpetuation of established Tudor history, where Vergil constructed a history intermixed with Tudor history, and More’s connection to John Morton affected the villainous image of the tyrannous king. This negative image is accentuated through the antithesis of Richards treachery in juxtaposition of Richmond’s devotion, exemplified in the parallelism of ‘God and Saint George! Richmond and victory.’ The need to legitimize Elizabeth’s reign influenced Shakespeare’s portra...
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
“I am determined to prove a villain / and hate the idle pleasures of these days. / Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, / by drunken prophecies, libels and dreams.” Richard III, the evil Duke of Gloucester, is fighting a bloody road to the crown in Shakespeare's dramatic play. Stopped by nothing and with brilliant intelligence, Richard fights his way to the king’s position, clothing his villany with “old odd ends stolen out of holy writ.” With no one to fully trust, Richard breaks many hearts by killing all people in his way, and becomes the unstoppable villain. He hides behind a shield of kindness and care, but when he is alone, his real soul comes alive. Sending murderers, or killing people himself, he has no mercy. Manipulating Lady Anne to marry him and promising Buckingham rewards for his deeds, he knows what he is doing, and won’t stop until the crown lies at his feet.
...f control of scenes and verbal encounters, which finally ends with his magnificent downfall. [implement more Margaret control/curses/competition in the beginning]. Despite Richard's best attempts to write his own ending, the audience is now forced with the truth that it was Margaret's prophecy that ripened to fruition. With Richard's final soliloquy taking blame for his actions and "the outward movement away from any semblance of Richard's control, completes the separation of Richard and audience" (Schellenberg 66). Through the course of Act V, Richard takes part in only two of the six scenes. Of these two scenes, he shares the stage with Richmond, the rising actor to take the lead role.
“Whenever my environment had failed to support or nourish me, I had clutched at books...” ― Richard Wright, Black Boy this is a quote from the famous Richard Wright an African American author. This quote means that no matter what was placed in his way or what he lacked that others had he hung on to what he had and did what he could. And the more he read about the world, the more he longed to see it and make a permanent break from the Jim Crow South. "I want my life to count for something," he told a friend. Richard Wright wanted to make a difference in the world and a difference he did make. Richard Wright was an important figure in American History because he stood astride the midsection of his time period as a battering ram, paving the way for many black writers who followed him, these writers were Ralph Ellison, Chester Himes, James Baldwin, Gwendolyn Brooks, Lorraine Hansberry, John Williams. In some ways he helped change the American society.
...e was also writing in Tudor England and seemed to have openly dislike Richard III. In other portions of his writing he describes Richard as an unattractive deformed man who was born with a full set of teeth. He writes that he had a “sour countenance , which seemed to savour of mischief, and utter evidently craft and deceit.”
Poet, journalist, essayist, and novelist Richard Wright developed from an uneducated Southerner to one of the most cosmopolitan, politically active writers in American literature. In many of Richard Wright's works, he exemplifies his own life and proves to “white” America that African American literature should be taken seriously. Before Wright, “white” America failed to acknowledge the role African American writing played in shaping American culture. It was shocking in itself that an African American could write at all. Thus, Richard Wright is well known as the father of African American literature mainly because of his ability to challenge the literary stereotypes given to African Americans.
Richard had weakened since he had become king and was no longer ruthless as he had no reason to be ruthless. He had got what he wanted and was pleased with himself. He thought he was invincible, and he was too confident, which cost him his life. If he had been more careful, he would have been aware of the danger that lied before him. But, he did use some similar techniques in both the scenes.
Richard’s disdain for humane beliefs and customs (such as religion, marriage, and family) shows when he treats them as nothing more than empty forms – this further labels him as a demon of indiscipline and rebellion. He sees virtues as contrary to his power-thirsty nature and aim, which emphasizes his pathological shamelessness and lack of hremorse. With his charisma, he woos Lady Anne in order to disempower her, revealing his disregard towards the seriousnesss of murder and respect for women: “What though I killed her husband and her father?” (I.i.156). Richard shows his disrespect towards love and marriage as he becomes her husband “ not so much for love / [but] for another secret close intent” (I.i.159-160) to benefit himself. In Act IV, Richard “prays” with ...
At the very outset of the play, readers are presented with the power-hungry, self-loathing Duke of Gloucester, defined by his thirst for vengeance and power and by his uncanny ability to manipulate the minds of the people around him. Richard appeals to the audience’s sympathies in his self-deprecating description, when he declares that he is deformed, unfinished, and so hideous and unfashionable that dogs bark at him as he passes by. The imagery he utilizes throughout the opening soliloquy also evokes a feeling of opposition and juxtaposition which speaks to the duality of his nature.The juxtapositions he employs are more than rhetorical devices, as ...
This contributes to a very villainous role. Richard begins his journey to the throne. He manipulates Lady Anne. into marrying him, even though she knows that he murdered her first. husband.
"therefore, since I can not prove a lover, To entertain these fair well spoken days, I am determined to be a villain".As a villain Richard must be heartless, he can not let his emotions interfere with his actions.
Before the start of the play, Richard knows his plan of action: obtaining the crown through whatever means necessary. He has to kill off all of the male heirs that come before him, which includes Clarence, King Edward, and his princely nephews. In his pursuit, he tells King Edward that “[there is] a prophecy which says that “G”/ Of Edward’s heirs the murderer shall be,” (Shakespeare I. i. 39-40), which could pertain to Clarence or Richard. However, since Richard has clear intentions, the “G” stands for his title as Duke of Gloucester. Since Richard killed Queen Margaret’s son, Edward, she prays to God to “Cancel his bond of life, dear God I pray,/ That I may live and say ‘The dog is dead’,” (Shakespeare IV. iv. 79-80). The prophecy becomes reality once Richmond defeats Richard in battle and kills him (Shakespeare V. v. 1-2). These prophecies propel Richard down the path of no return; killing his kin and fighting a war he cannot hope to
He breeds anger in Clarence and the populace, not of himself, but of Edward and the rightful heirs. "We are not safe, Clarence, we are not safe,"3 he exclaims as his brother is hauled away to the tower. He preys on the "hateful luxury And bestial appetite"4 of the citizenry, catapulting himself to the thrown over a heap of bodies: deaths that hang on his head. But, it is Richard's attitude that his end goal of the crown justifies the murderous means that so closely links ...