Richard Gossip Murder Case

595 Words2 Pages

In Oklahoma, a man named Richard Gossip got sentenced to be put to death for a crime he said that he did not commit in 1997. In 1997, Gossip was convicted of demanding and ordering the brutal beating of Barry Van Treese. Barry Van Treese was a man who owned a motel where the inmate, Richard Gossip worked. According to “evidence”, Gossip hired another young coworker of the motel, Justin Steed, to brutally beat and kill Treese. According to the jury and the Court, they didn’t have any actual evidence that Gossip had anything to do with it. They couldn’t even place him at the crime scene. Although Gossip didn’t have any proven evidence, that’s another story for Justin Steed though. According to the Crime Scene Investigators, Steed’s fingerprints and DNA were all over the crime scene; even in the car of the victim. Policemen told Steed that he would not face a life sentence and a death sentence if he told the police what really happened. Steed was quick to respond that he was ordered to kill Van Treese by Gossip but yet, he admitted to the crime. Because of Steed committing to the crime about Gossip, he was just given a life sentence instead of a death sentence. When the cops came after Gossip because of Steed’s testimony, the jury persecuted Gossip. Even though they didn’t have actual …show more content…

In 2004, a second trial was appealed. Before the judging and verdicts ended, the prosecutors offered Gossip a deal: if he were to plead guilty to second-degree murder, he would only receive a lifetime sentence and a possibility of parole after the first twenty years. Gossip was determined to make the jury, judge, and prosecutors believe that he was innocent so he refused the offer. In 2004, the second jury even found him guilty and sentenced him to death just the like first trial. According to the jury, they found him being inconsistent changing his story from

Open Document