More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative paper
Discuss the ethical and social implications of artificial intelligence
Robots'effect on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Machines with Feelings
In “The Future of Machines with Feelings”, Scott Feschuk responds to the article, “We Know How You Feel”, written by Raff Khatchadourian, from The New Yorker, on January 19, 2015. Feschuk was quick to respond to the essay in Maclean’s magazine on January 24, 2015. Feschuk describes the negative impacts that will appear once machines with the ability “to read our feelings and react in ways that have come to seem startlingly human” (229). He jokes about the numerous negatives that machines with feelings will bring to our society. The future of machines is advancing and is explained in a consistent tone and reflective view. In order to explain, Scott Feschuk mocks the negatives of machines with feelings by his use of content, and his humorous writing style.
…show more content…
Firstly, Feschuk focusses on content and evidence to mock the negatives of machines with feelings.
In the essay, Feschuk explains that privacy will be compromised with these machines. Machines with feelings could easily take an advantage of our privacy by monitoring each and every move. Furthermore, Feschuk uses rhetorical questions throughout his essay to draw the attention of the reader. For example, he begins with three rhetorical questions that mock our relationship with our devices. The use of these rhetorical questions subtly influences the audience to think critically about the usage of devices and their negative impact on our daily lives. He further uses short paragraphs throughout the essay to grab his reader’s attention. The use of short paragraphs made it easier to follow and understand the point of the essay. Feschuk provides evidence throughout the essay with relatable scenarios. For example, you could have a fight with your spouse and “your cable box may choose to show you an ad for a marriage counsellor” (230). With the use of real-life scenarios, he convinces the readers that your technology will interfere with your personal
relationships. Secondly, Feschuk use of diction and humorous writing style further mocks the impacts of machines with feelings. In the essay, Feschuk uses words like “ubiquitous” to emphasize that he is an educated person who is well informed about the subject. The use of words like this makes him seem credible. He also uses informal language. The use of informal language makes it easier for readers to follow and makes it more conversational. Furthermore, the author consistently uses direct quotes. These quotes provide evidence for the all the claims he has made about the negative impacts of machines with feelings. The style he uses for his writing is a humorous tone. For example, he used irony to indirectly express that machines with feelings will ultimately be negative. As Feschuk says, “will [technology] be harnessed for the betterment of society as a whole? Or for a second reason that isn’t as totally naïve as that first one” (229). He explains that technology will never be positive in our society. It will always be taken advantage of for the worst. This tone of writing points towards anyone that will be affected by the uprising of machines with feelings. Therefore, Feschuk uses a unique writing style. Feschuk reminds his readers that technology is taking a new turn in society which will not have positive influences. He effectively succeeds in persuading his readers that machines with feelings will be taking advantage of our privacy. The strategy he used to support his claims were a humorous, but formal writing style, and content with evidence. I agree with Feschuk’s opinion of the future of machines with feelings. He provides logical reasoning to support his claims. His examples provided were relatable and presented in a conversational matter that made it easy to follow. I think he accomplishes its purpose by providing us with why we should not have machines with feelings. His use of content and writing style clearly illustrated that machines with feelings will not have a positive impact on society.
Technology is evolving and growing as fast as Moore’s Law has predicted. Every year a new device or process is introduced and legacy devices becomes obsolete. Twenty years ago, no one ever thought that foldable and paper screens would be even feasible. Today, although it isn’t a consumer product yet, foldable and paper screens are a reality. Home automation, a more prominent example of new technologies that were science fiction years ago are now becoming an integral part of life. As technology and its foothold in today’s world grows, its effects on humanity begin to show and much more prominently than ever. In his essay, O.k. Glass, Gary Shteyngart shows the effects of technology in general and on a personal note. Through the use of literary
Throughout his preface of the book titled Why We Can’t Wait, which entails the unfair social conditions of faultless African Americans, Martin Luther King employs a sympathetic allegory, knowledge of the kids, and a change in tone to prevail the imposed injustice that is deeply rooted in the society—one founded on an “all men are created equal” basis—and to evoke America to take action.
deep need to probe the mysterious space between human thoughts and what is a machine can
Everyday, our world gains a new technology advancement. At first it began with a computer being created in the year of 1822 by Charles Babbage. Which now turned into having an everything being held on a 4.7-inch screen device. Engagements with other individuals are different now. Preferably teenagers would rather create a group message than start a conversation. The amount of terrorist attacks and technology consumed on a daily basis created a suspicion upon the government. Fahrenheit 451 and Minority report authors both demonstrate their concern on the effect of technology and government have on our future.
A major falling point of robots and machines when placed in a human’s position is that robots cannot improvise. Robots can only do what they are programmed to do. if Damasio is right, emotions are ‘improvised’ by the human brain even before someone is conscious of what they are feeling. Therefore it is even harder to make machines feel true emotions. An example of this exists in Ray Bradbury’s short story “August 2026.” A completely automated house survives after nuclear warfare has devastated the Earth. Cheerful voices go on announcing schedules and birth dates, the stove prepares steaming hot food right on time, and robotic mice keep the house spotless and free of dust- in eerie contrast to the barren and destroyed city surrounding it. The house lets nothing in, closing its shutters even to birds, but lets in a sick and famished stray dog, which limps into the house and dies. The robotic mice think nothing of the dead dog but a mess that needed cleaning up: “Delicately sensing decay at last, the regiments of mice hummed out as softly as blown gray leaves in an electrical wind. Two-fifteen. The dog was gone. In the cellar, the incinerator glowed suddenly and a whirl of sparks leaped up the chimney.” The house, seeming so cheerful, caring for its attendants, has no compassion or reverence for the dog. The mice were programmed to clean up messes, and nothing beyond. This is why in science
Scott Feschuk’s article “The Future of Machines with Feelings” was published in MacLean’s Magazine in 2015. In his essay, Feschuk delivers a vivid picture of emotionally responsive machines and the future of human-machine interaction. On the other hand, he raised his concerns about privacy rights of individuals, which could be violated by emotional sensing machines. Moreover, he mentioned findings of expert researchers such as Rana el Kaliouby. Although this may be true that emotional machines could violate human privacy rights, but technology is going to take over our lives. It can help autistic children to better react to human emotions. Corporations would target emotional state
Carr starts off his argument by referencing a “2001 a space odyssey” released in 1968 about a computer named HAL that tries to kill the astronauts that are on the spaceship that HAL controls. Carr uses an excerpt from this movie to incite fear into his readers and fear clouds judgement and causes irrational ideas to be formed. This movie is an over exaggerated sci-fi thriller and not a realistic representation of what computers are becoming. At the conclusion of his argument Carr does not forget to leave his readers the way he greeted them, Carr quotes 2001: a space odyssey “i can feel it. I’m afraid” (Carr 328). Although emotions are a strong way to engage with a reader, strong emotions also distract readers from the actual argument and encourage the reader to make a decision based on their feeling rather than their actual brain. The fact that Carr uses emotion to convince his readers is quite ironic, considering he is arguing that new technology is limiting our ability to use our brains. In contrast Thompson’s article uses logic and reason to make his argument. At the same time Thompson’s article still engages readers and is just as interesting to read as Carr’s essay. Thompson’s article starts off pondering whether computers or humans are better at chess. To answer this
The advancement of technology that our society has been privileged with is starting to take over human’s emotions and replace them with those of a robot, for instance, our responses to a deep conversation are becoming very brief and we’re starting to yield our own opinions so we suit society guidelines. When it comes to the discussion of technology, particularly, our smartphones I have mixed feelings because, in my opinion, we do have a great tool in the palm of our hands. However, I additionally think human emotions are starting to become noticeably silenced because of our new-found love, smartphones. I believe it is imperative for us to comprehend our emotions so that we can better the understanding of not only each other but also ourselves.
In summary, both the article and the novel critique the public’s reliance on technology. This topic is relevant today because Feed because it may be how frightening the future society may look like.
The twenty first century in the century of technology, where technology is heavily used in the people daily lives. One of the field where technology is being utilized in is monitoring people through cameras and phone calls. Although it might be interfering with people privacy, but it has its advantages that might outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will discuss both points of view, and try to decide which one is more reasonable than the other.
The novel, Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other (2011) written by Sherry Turkle, presents many controversial views, and demonstrating numerous examples of how technology is replacing complex pieces and relationships in our life. The book is slightly divided into two parts with the first focused on social robots and their relationships with people. The second half is much different, focusing on the online world and it’s presence in society. Overall, Turkle makes many personally agreeable and disagreeable points in the book that bring it together as a whole.
Technology is robbing people of personal privacy. Today’s generation view technology as a basic necessity. It is found everywhere. There are even homes that are completely automated. However it is safe to say were being robbed of our personal privacy. For instance many people carry their cellular phone to the washroom. Another example of the intrusive nature of the cell phone is at funerals. Many have been at such a private and personal moment only to be interrupted by the irreverent ringtone from a cellular phone. Not to mention that there are families who no longer enjoy face to face communication with their loved ones. All emotions are now translated by emoticons, a computer application.
Technological advancements have positively impacted society by increasing safety, promoting global communication, and presenting easy access to knowledge. However, there are many negative impacts to these devices, including the manipulation of privacy.
As technology as advanced, so has our society. We are able to accomplish many tasks much easier, faster, and in effective ways. However, if looked at the harmful impact it has had on the society, one can realize that these are severe and really negative. One of the main concerns is privacy rights. Many people want that their information and personal data be kept in secrecy, however with today’s technology, privacy is almost impossible. No matter how hard one tries, information being leaked through technological advancements have become more and more common. With personal information being leaked, one does not know exactly how the information will be used, which validates the statement that privacy rights have been diminishing and should be brought to concern. Many people do not realize that their information is being used by third-parties and to consumer companies. In conclusion, technology has had a significant effect on privacy
In case of emergencies, robots could reduce the percentage of fatal damages that occurs through these cases. In fact, humans’ lives are much valuable and precious rather than robots, in which societies could use robots to scarify through the dangerous situation for the sake of rescuing people. In addition, dangerous situations such as firefighting or earthquake require much effort, precision, and scarifying in the evacuation process. Furthermore, a beneficial feature that could help robots to coexist through the risky situations easily and preform the rescuing mission perfectly is that robots do not have feelings or emotions. According to Bruemmer (2006), robots do not have the ability to realize or notify any aspect that people do not programmed them to do. In other words, robots are merely machines that cannot feel or recognize what surrounding them without a sophisticated program done by humans. Therefore, as robots do not have the ability of feeling or knowing they could go through inhumane conditions for saving people. Moreover, robots have various capabilities that make them unique enable them to do heavy duties and bear more serio...